Embedded, constant time delay instruction by peers without disabilities in general education classrooms

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 346-363

  Matt Jameson, J ^a   McDonnell, John ^a   Polychronis, Shamby ^a   Riesen, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEACHING;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TEACHING;

EID: 58249092253     PISSN: 19349556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/2008.46:346-363     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Carter, E. W., Cushing, L. S., Clark, N. M., & Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students' access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 15-25.
2. Carter, E. W., & Kennedy, C. H. (2006). Promoting access to the general education curriculum using peer support strategies. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 284-292.
3. Cushing, L. S., & Kennedy, C. H. (1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 139-152.
4. Gilberts, G. H., Agran, M., Hughes, C., & Wehmeyer, M. (2001). The effects of peer delivered self-monitoring strategies on the participation of students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 26, 25-36.
5. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., & Kamps, D. (1990). Teacher mediated versus peer mediated instruction: A review of educational advantages and disadvantages. In H. C. Foot, M. J. Morgan, & R. H. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children (pp. 177-205). New York: Wiley.
6. Harrower, J. (1999). Educational inclusion of children with severe disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 1, 215-230.
7. Helmstetter, E., Peck, C. A., & Giangreco, M. F. (1994). Outcomes of interactions with peers with moderate or severe disabilities: A statewide survey of high school students. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 19, 263-276.
8. Hunt, P., & McDonnell, J. (2007). Inclusive education. In S. L. Odom, R. H. Horner, M. Snell, & J. Blacher (Eds.), Handbook on developmental disabilities (pp. 269-291). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Johnson, J. W., & McDonnell, J. (2004). An exploratory study of the implementation of embedded instruction by general educators with students with developmental disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 46-63.
10. Johnson, J. W., McDonnell, J., Holzwarth, V., & Hunter, K. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 6, 214-227.
11. McDonnell, J. (1998). Instruction for students with severe disabilities in general education settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 199-215.
12. McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., Polychronis, S., & Riesen, T. (2002). The effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 363-377.
13. McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., Allen, C., & Mathot-Buckner, C. (2000). The effects of partner learning during spelling for students with severe disabilities and their peers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 107-122.
14. Moortweet, S. L., Utley, C. A., Walker, D., Dawson, H. L., Delquadri, J. C., Reddy, S. S., Greenwood, C. R., Hamilton, S., & Ledford, D. (1999). Classwide peer tutoring: Teaching students with mild mental retardation in inclusive classrooms. Exceptional Children, 65, 524-536.
15. Riesen, T., McDonnell, J., Johnson, J., Polychronis, S., & Jameson, M. (2003). A comparison of time delay and simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction in general education classes with students with moderate to severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, (4)241-259.
16. Rose, C. (1981). Social integration of school age ESN(S) children in a regular school. Special Education, 8, (4)17-22.
17. Snell, M. E., & Gast, D. L. (1981). Applying time delay procedures to the instruction of the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 6, (3)3-14.
18. Staub, D., Spaulding, M., Peck, C. A., Gallucci, C., & Schwartz, I. S. (1995). Using nondisabled peers to support the inclusion of students with disabilities at the junior high school level. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 21, 194-205.
19. U.S. Department of Education. (2004). 26th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Utah State Office of Education. (1999). Secondary core curriculum: Health education 7-12. Salt Lake City: Author.
21. Utah State Office of Education. (2001). Secondary core curriculum: Fine Arts 7-12. Salt Lake City: Author.
22. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third edition. San Antonio, TX; The Psychological Corporation.
23. Weiner, J. S. (2005). Peer-mediated conversational repair in students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 26-31.
24. Westling, D. L., & Fox, L. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
25. Wolery, M., Anthony, L., Caldwell, N. K., Snyder, E. D., & Morgante, J. D. (2002). Embedding and distributing constant time delay in circle time and transitions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 14-25.
26. Wolery, M., Anthony, L., Snyder, E. D., Werts, M. G., & Katzenmeyer, J. (1997). Training elementary teachers to embed instruction during classroom activities. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 40-58.
27. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains, NY: Longman.
28. Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C., Doyle, P., Schuster, J., & Ault, M. et al. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239-266.
29. Wolery, M., & Schuster, J. W. (1997). Instructional methods with students who have significant disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 31, 61-83.
30. Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Snyder, E. D., & Caldwell, N. K. (1994). Efficacy of constant time delay implemented by peer tutors in general education classrooms. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 415-436.
31. Zhang, J., Gast, D., Horvat, M., & Dattilo, J. (2000). The effectiveness of a constant time delay procedure on teaching lifetime sport skills to adolescents with severe to profound intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 51-64.