Preimplantation genetic screening: A survey of in vitro fertilization clinics

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 685-690

  Baruch, Susannah ^a   Kaufman, David J ^a   Hudson, Kathy L ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy screening; In vitro fertilization; IVF; PGD; PGS; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Preimplantation genetic screening

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; MATERNAL AGE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNITED STATES; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; ANEUPLOIDY; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58249089676     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818180a1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. National Conference of State Legislatures. Genetics policy report: reproductive technologies. 2001.
2. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM. Pregnancies from biop-sied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344:768-770.
3. Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S, et al. Over a decade of experience with preimplan-tation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report. Fertil Steril 2004;82:292-294. (Pubitemid 39092021)
4. Sermon KD, Michiels A, Harton G, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection VI: cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2004. Hum Reprod 2007;22:323-336.
5. Munne S, Magli C, Cohen J, et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2191-2199.
6. Verlinsky Y, Kuliev A. Florescence in situ hybridization analysis of polar bodies and blastomeres. In: An Atlas of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Parthenon; 2000:31-39.
7. Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneu-ploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;25:CD005291.
8. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Echten-Arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preim-plantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 2007;357:9-17.
9. Munne S, Chen S, Fischer J, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2005;84:331-335.
10. Munne S, Fischer J, Warner A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2006;85: 326-332.
11. Verlinsky Y, Tur-Kaspa I, Cieslak J, et al. Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor-prognosis patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:219-225.
12. Staessen C,PlatteauP, Van Assche E, et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2849-2858.
13. Baruch S, Kaufman D, Hudson KL. Genetic testing of embryos: practices and perspectives of US. IVF Clinics. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1053-1058.
14. BaruchS, Adamson GD, CohenJ, et al. Genetic testingof embryos: acritical need for data. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:667-670.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003 assisted reproductive technology (ART) report: appendix C. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ ART2003/appixc-nonreport.htm. Accessed March 6, 2007.
16. Fertility clinic success rate and certification act of 1992. 42 USC Sec 263a-1.
17. Jones HW Jr. IVF: past and future. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:375-381.
18. Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 2005;54:1-24.
19. Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for an-euploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2005;83:393-397.
20. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, et al. The beneficial effects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:633-640.
21. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, et al. Improved implantation after preimplan-tation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:91-97. (Pubitemid 36874416)
22. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munne S. Preimplantation diagnosis for ane-uploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril 1999;72:837-844.
23. Cohen J, Munne S. Comment 2 on Staessen et al. (2004). Two-cell biopsy and PGD pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2363-2364.
24. Munne S, Gianaroli L, Tur-Kaspa I, et al. Substandard application screening may interfere of preimplantation genetic with its clinical success. Fertil Steril 2007;88: 781-784.
25. Stevens J, Wale P, Surrey ES, Schoolcraft W. Is aneuploidy screening for patients aged 35 or over beneficial? A prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2004; 82(suppl 2):249.
26. Obasaju M, Kadam A, Biancardi T, et al. Pregnancies from single normal embryo transfer in women older than 40 years. Reprod Biomed Online 2001;2:98-101.
27. Collins JA. Preimplantation genetic screening in older mothers. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:61-63.
28. Shahine LK, Cedars MI. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis does not increase pregnancy rates in patients at risk for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 2006;85:51-56
29. The President's Council on Bioethics. Reproduction and responsibility: the regulation of new biotechnologies. Washington DC; 2004.
30. Balanced budged downpayment act I of 1996. Pub. L. No, 104-99, Sec 128, 110 Stat. 26, 34. 1996.
31. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2005. Health e-stats. Released November 21, 2006. USDHHS CDC National Center for Health Statistics.
32. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2004. National vital statistics reports; vol 55 no 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2006.
33. The Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril 1999;72:595-598.
34. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2004;82(suppl 1):S120-S122.
35. The Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Guidelines for good practice in PGD. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;9:430-434.
36. Simpson JL, Rebar RW, Carson SA. Professional self-regulation for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: experience ofthe American society for reproductive medicine and other professional societies. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1653-1660.
37. Thornhill AR, DeDie-Smulders CE, Geraedts JP, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preim-plantation genetic screening (PGS)'. Hum Reprod 2005;20:35-48.
38. The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Preim-plantation genetic testing: A Practice Committee opinion. Corrected Proof, 17 October 2007. Fertil Steril DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2007.10.010. 2008.