Professional self-regulation for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: experience of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and other professional societies

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1653-1660

  Simpson, Joe Leigh ^a   Rebar, Robert W ^b,c   Carson, Sandra Ann ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

assisted reproductive technologies; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; professional societies; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOREGULATION; BIOETHICS; ETHICS; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAW; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; REPRODUCTION; SOCIETY; TECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33744542981     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.072     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium. Data Collection III (May 2001). Hum Reprod 17 (2002) 233-246
2. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2003 assisted reproductive technology success rates. national summary and fertility clinic reports (2005), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta, GA
3. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2004 compendium of ASRM practice committee and ethics committee reports. Fertil Steril 82 Suppl 1 (2004) S1-S262
4. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, and The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Revised minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1556-9. Republished in Fertil Steril 82 Suppl 1 (2004) S4-S7
5. Medical Research International, and The American Fertility Society Special Interest Group. In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in the United States. 1985 and 1986 results from the national IVF/ET registry. Fertil Steril 49 (1988) 212-215
6. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States. 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril 81 (2004) 1207-1220
7. American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. A practice committee report: preimplantation genetics diagnosis. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, 2001. Republished in Fertil Steril 82 Suppl 1 (2004) S120-S122
8. The Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Guidelines for good practice in PGD. Reprod Biomed Online 9 (2004) 430-434
9. Thornhill A.R., deDie-Smulders C.E., Geraedts J.P., Harper J.C., Harton G.L., Lavery S.A., et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 35-48
10. Baruch S., Adamson G., Cohen J., Gibbons W., Hughes M., et al. Genetic testing of embryos. a critical need for data. Reprod BioMed Online 11 (2005) 667-670
11. The President's Council on Bioethics. Reproduction and responsibility. the regulation of new biotechnologies (2004) Washington, DC
12. Gianaroli L., Magli M.C., Ferraretti A.P., Fiorentino A., Garrisi J., and Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos. Fertil Steril 68 (1997) 1128-1131
13. Simpson J.L., and Liebaers I. Assessing congenital anomalies after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 13 (1996) 170-176