Virtual dissection of pig carcasses

Meat Science

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 699-704

  Vester Christensen, Martin ^a   Erbou, Søren G H ^a   Hansen, Mads F ^a   Olsen, Eli V ^b   Christensen, Lars B ^b   Hviid, Marchen ^b   Ersbøll, Bjarne K ^a   Larsen, Rasmus ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b DANISH MEAT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Calibration reference; Computed tomography; Image analysis; Lean meat percentage; Pig carcass grading

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE;

EID: 58149503744     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cho Z.-H., Jones J.P., and Singh M. Foundations of medical imaging (1993), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2. Christensen, L. B., Vester-Christensen, M., Borggaard, C., & Olsen, E. V. (2008). Robustness of weight and meat content in pigs determined by CT. In 54th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (ICoMST).
3. Collewet G., Bogner P., Allen P., Busk H., Dobrowolski A., Olsen E., et al. Determination of the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses using magnetic resonance imaging. Meat Science 70 (2005) 563-572
4. Commission of the European Communities (EC) (1994). EC regulation no. 3127/94 amending regulation (EC) no. 2967/85 laying down detailed rules for the application of the community scale for grading pig carcasses. ECOJ Nr L330, 43.
5. Dobrowolski A., Branscheid W., Romvàri R., Horn P., and Allen P. X-ray computed tomography as possible reference for the pig carcass evaluation. Fleischwirtschaft 84 3 (2004) 109-112
6. Glasbey C.A., and Robinson C.D. Estimators of tissue proportions from X-ray CT images. Biometrics 58 (2002) 928-936
7. Gonzalez R.C., and Woods R.E. Digital image processing. 2nd ed. (2002), Prentice Hall
8. Holland P.W., and Welsch R.E. Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 6 9 (1977) 813-827
9. Johansen J., Egelandsdal B., Røe M., Kvaal K., and Aastveit A.H. Calibration models for lamb carcass composition analysis using computerized tomography (CT) imaging. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 87 2 (2007) 303-311
10. Larsen R. 3-D contextual Bayesian classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10 3 (2000) 518-524
11. Lyckegaard, A., Larsen, R., Christensen, L. B., Vester-Christensen, M., & Olsen, E. V. (2006). Contextual analysis of CT scanned pig carcasses. In: 52nd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (ICoMST) (pp. 207-208).
12. Nissen P.M., Busk H., Oksama M., Seynaeve M., Gispert M., Walstra P., et al. The estimated accuracy of the EU reference dissection method for pig carcass classification. Meat Science 73 1 (2006) 22-28
13. Olsen E.V., Candek-Potokar M., Oksama M., Kien S., Lisiak D., and Busk H. On-line measurements in pig carcass classification: Repeatability and variation caused by the operator and the copy of instrument. Meat Science 75 1 (2007) 29-38
14. Roberts N., Cruz-Orive L.M., Reid N.M., Brodie D.A., Bourne M., and Edwards R.H. Unbiased estimation of human body composition by the cavalieri method using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Microscopy 171 (1993) 239-253
15. Romvári R., Dobrowolski A., Repa I., Allen P., Olsen E., Szabo A., and Horn P. Development of a computed tomography calibration method for the determination of lean meat content in pig carcasses. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 54 1 (2006) 1-10
16. Walstra, P., & Merkus, G. S. M. (1996). Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EU reference dissection method in pig carcass classification. ID-DLO 96.014.