On-line measurements in pig carcass classification: Repeatability and variation caused by the operator and the copy of instrument

Meat Science

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 29-38

  Olsen, Eli V ^a   Candek Potokar, Marjeta ^b   Oksama, Marjatta ^a   Kien, Stefan ^c   Lisiak, Dariusz ^c   Busk, Hans ^d  

^a DANISH MEAT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

^b AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE OF SLOVENIA   (Slovenia)

^c Instytut Przemysłu Miesnego i Tłuszczowego Warsaw   (Poland)

^d DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

Author keywords

On line measurements; Pig classification; Precision; Repeatability; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33749998567     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Brøndum J., Egebo M., Agerskov C., and Busk H. On-line pork carcass grading with the Autofom ultrasound system. Journal of Animal Science 76 (1998) 1859-1868
2. Busk H., Olsen E.V., and Brøndum J. Determination of lean meat in pig carcasses with the Autofom classification system. Meat Science 52 (1999) 307-314
3. Daumas, G. (2001). Non-electronic techniques to classify pig carcasses in small slaughterhouses. In Second international virtual conference on pork quality, 5 November to 6 December 2001 - Via Internet.
4. EC-Regulation, No. 2967/85. (1985). laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcasses, amended by Regulation (EC) No. 3127/94, 1994.
5. Fortin A., Jones S.D.M., and Haworth C.R. A note on the accuracy of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-o-Meater in measuring fat and muscle thickness in pig carcasses. Animal Production 38 (1984) 507-510
6. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. (1995). International Organization for Standardization. Case Postale 56. CH-1211 Genève 20, Switzerland.
7. ISO, 5725-1. (1994). Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions. International Organization for Standardization. Case Postale 56. CH-1211 Genève 20, Switzerland.
8. Nissen P.M., Busk H., Oksama M., Seynaeve M., Gispert M., Walstra P., et al. The accuracy of the EU reference dissection method for pig carcass classification. Meat Science 73 (2006) 22-28
9. Rasmussen, M. K. (1994). Classification of carcasses in Denmark. In Presented at international symposium instrumental classification of pig carcasses 12-13 September 1994 in Poznan, Poland.
10. Walstra, P., & Merkus, G. S. M. (1996). Procedure for assessment of the lean meat percentage as a consequence of the new EU reference dissection method in pig carcass classification. Report ID-DLO 96 014. DLO-Institute for Animal Science and Health éd. Lelystad, The Netherlands. 22 p.
11. www.eupigclass.net. EC project G6RD-CT-1999-00127 EUPIGCLASS.
12. Little Ramon.C., Milliken George.A., Stroup Walter.W., and Wolfinger Russell.D. SAS system for mixed models (1996), SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC 633 pp
13. SAS software, version 8 (1999). Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.