Assessing clinical competency: Reports from discussion groups

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 343-353

  Turnwald, Grant ^a   Stone, Elizabeth ^b   Bristol, David ^c   Fuentealba, Carmen ^d   Hardie, Lizette ^c   Hellyer, Peter ^e   Jaeger, Laurie ^f   Kerwin, Sharon ^f   Kochevar, Deborah ^g   Lissemore, Kerry ^b   Olsen, Christopher ^h   Rogers, Kenita ^f   Sabin, Beth ⁱ   Swanson, Cliff ^c   Warner, Angeline ^g  

^a VIRGINIA MARYLAND REGIONAL COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^e Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences

^f TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

ⁱ AVMA ^*

Author keywords

Clinical competencies; Competency assessment; Veterinary education

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; EDUCATION, VETERINARY; FACULTY; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PRECEPTORSHIP; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; SOCIETIES; VETERINARIANS;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 58149395875     PISSN: 0748321X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/jvme.35.3.343     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bransford J, Brown AL, Cocking RR, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1999.
2. Cañas AJ, Ford KM, Novak JD, Hayes P, Reichherzer T, Suri N. Online concept maps: enhancing collaborative learning by using technology with concept maps. Sci Teach 68:49-51, 2001.
3. Derbentseva N, Safayeni F, Cañas AJ. Experiments on the effect of map structure and concept quantification during concept map construction. In Cañas AJ, Novak JD, González FM, eds. Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology (Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Pública de Navarra, 2004.
4. Derbentseva N, Safayeni F, Cañas AJ. Concept maps: experiments on dynamic thinking. J Res Sci Teach 44:448-465, 2007.
5. Edmondson K. Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In Mintzes J, Wandersee J, Novak J, eds. Assessing Science Understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000:19-40.
6. Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Goulet F, van der Vleuten C. Research basic to medical education: the script concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med 12:189-195, 2000.
7. Sparks R. 360° performance evaluation 〈http://www. missouribusiness.net/cq/2002/360_performance_eval.asp〉. Accessed 08/12/08. Creating Quality 11(9), 2002.
8. Adams CL, Kurtz SM. Building on existing models from human medical education to develop a communication curriculum in veterinary medicine. J Vet Med Educ 33:28-37, 2006.
9. Kochevar DT, Stone EA. Assessing clinical competency: our professional responsibility. J Vet Med Educ 35:343-353, 2008. (current issue).