Comparison of voice acquisition methodologies in speech research

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 982-987

  Vogel, Adam P ^a   Maruff, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOICE; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 58149388454     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.982     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alpert, M., Rosenberg, S. D., Pouget, E. R., & Shaw, R. J. (2000). Prosody and lexical accuracy in flat affect schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 97, 107-118.
2. Bielamowicz, S., Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Dauer, M. S., & Berke, G. S. (1996). Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 39, 26-134.
3. Bough Jr., I. D., Heuer, R. J., Sataloff, R. T., Hills, J. R., & Cater, J. R. (1996). Intrasubject variability of objective voice measures. Journal of Voice, 10, 166-174.
4. Cannizzaro, M. S., Reilly, N., Mundt, J. C., & Snyder, P. J. (2005). Remote capture of human voice acoustical data by telephone: A methods study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19, 649.
5. Carding, P. N., Steen, I. N., Webb, A., MacKenzie, K., Deary, I. J., & Wilson, J. A. (2004). The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences, 29, 538-544.
6. Carson, C. P., Ingrisano, D. R., & Eggleston, K. D. (2003). The effect of noise on computer-aided measures of voice: A comparison of CSpeechSP and the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program software using the CSL 4300B Module and Multi-Speech for Windows. Journal of Voice, 17, 12-20.
7. Dejonckere, P. H., Bradley, P., Clemente, P., Cornut, G., Crevier-Buchman, L., Friedrich, G., et al. (2001). A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 258, 77-82.
8. Deliyski, D. D., Evans, M. K., & Shaw, H. S. (2005). Influence of data acquisition environment on accuracy of acoustic voice quality measurements. Journal of Voice, 19, 176-186.
9. Deliyski, D. D., Shaw, H. S., & Evans, M. K. (2005a). Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements. Journal of Voice, 19, 15-28.
10. Deliyski, D. D., Shaw, H. S., & Evans, M. K. (2005b). Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology, 30, 55-62.
11. Deliyski, D. D., Shaw, H. S., Evans, M. K., & Vesselinov, R. (2006). Regression tree approach to studying factors influencing acoustic voice analysis. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 58, 274-288.
12. Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Jackson, M., Narayanan, S., & Alwan, A. (2000). Acoustic modeling of American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 343-356.
13. Fette, B., Gibson, R., & Greenwood, E. (1980). Windowing functions for the average magnitude difference function pitch extractor. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 5, 49-52.
14. Gerhard, D. (2003). Pitch extraction and fundamental frequency: History and current techniques (Tech. Rep. No. TR-CS 2003-06). Regina, SK: University of Regina, Department of Computer Science.
15. Green, J. R., Beukelman, D. R., & Ball, L. J. (2004). Algorithmic estimation of pauses in extended speech samples of dysarthric and typical speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 149-154.
16. Hillenbrand, J. (1987). A methodological study of perturbation and additive noise in synthetically generated voice signals. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 30, 448-461.
17. Hirose, K., Fujisaki, H., & Seto, S. (1992). A scheme for pitch extraction of speech using autocorrelation function with frame length proportional to the time lag. Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing, 1, 149-152.
18. Ingrisano, D. R. S., Perry, C. K., & Jepson, K. R. (1998). Environmental noise: A threat to automatic voice analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 91-96.
19. Jiang, J., Lin, E., & Hanson, D. G. (1998). Effect of tape recording on perturbation measures. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 41, 1031-1041.
20. Karnell, M. P. (1991). Laryngeal perturbation analysis: Minimum length of analysis window. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 34, 544-548.
21. Karnell, M. P., Hall, K. D., & Landahl, K. L. (1995). Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation measurements among three analysis systems. Journal of Voice, 9, 383-393.
22. Karnell, M. P., Scherer, R. S., & Fischer, L. B. (1991). Comparison of acoustic voice perturbation measures among three independent voice laboratories. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 34, 781-790.
23. Kent, R. D., Vorperian, H. K., & Duffy, J. R. (1999). Reliability of the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program for the analysis of voice samples of subjects with dysarthria. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 129-136.
24. Lei, K., Yang, X., Shen, J. Z., & Gong, J. R. (2000). The study on the standardization of adults voice acoustic parameters by objective analysis. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, 14, 255-257.
25. Ma, E. P., & Yiu, E. M. (2005). Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 57, 38-47.
26. Mueller, P. B. (1997). The aging voice. Seminars in Speech & Language, 18, 159-168.
27. Mundt, J. C., Snyder, P. J., Cannizzaro, M. S., Chappie, K., & Geralts, D. S. (2007). Voice acoustic measures of depression severity and treatment response collected via interactive voice response (IVR) technology. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 50-64.
28. Parsa, V., & Jamieson, D. G. (2001). Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: Sustained vowels versus continuous speech. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 44, 327-339.
29. Parsa, V., Jamieson, D. G., & Pretty, B. R. (2001). Effects of microphone type on acoustic measures of voice. Journal of Voice, 15, 331-343.
30. Perry, C. K., Ingrisano, D. R., & Blair, W. (1996). The influence of recording systems on jitter and shimmer estimates. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 86-90.
31. Perry, C. K., Ingrisano, D. R., Palmer, M. A., & McDonald, E. J. (2000). Effects of environmental noise on computer-derived voice estimates from female speakers. Journal of Voice, 14, 146-153.
32. Perry, C. K., Ingrisano, D. R., & Scott, S. R. (1996). Accuracy of jitter estimates using different filter settings on Visi-Pitch: A preliminary report. Journal of Voice, 10, 337-341.
33. Qi, Y., Hillman, R. E., & Milstein, C. (1999). The estimation of signal-to-noise ratio in continuous speech for disordered voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2532-2535.
34. Rabiner, L. R. (1977). On the use of autocorrelation analysis for pitch detection. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing, 25, 24-33.
35. Roa, S., Bennewitz, M., & Behnke, S. (2007). Fundamental frequency estimation based on pitch-scaled harmonic filtering. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2007 (pp. IV-397 to IV-400).
36. Scherer, R. C., Vail, V. J., & Guo, C. G. (1995). Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 38, 1260-1269.
37. Smits, I., Ceuppens, P., & De Bodt, M. S. (2005). A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab. Journal of Voice, 19, 187-196.
38. Titze, I. R., & Winholtz, W. S. (1993). Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 1177-1190.
39. Whitmore, J., & Fisher, S. (1996). Speech during sustained operations. Speech Communication, 20, 55-70.
40. Winholtz, W. S., & Titze, I. R. (1997). Miniature head-mounted microphone for voice perturbation analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 40, 894-899.
41. Winholtz, W. S., & Titze, I. R. (1998). Suitability of minidisc (MD) recordings for voice perturbation analysis. Journal of Voice, 12, 138-142.
42. Xue, S. A., & Fucci, D. (2000). Effects of race and sex on acoustic features of voice analysis. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 91, 951-958.