Environmental Noise: A Threat to Automatic Voice Analysis

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 91-96

  Ingrisano, Dennis R S ^a   Perry, Cecyle K ^b   Jepson, Kairsten R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c American Therapy Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Jitter; Noise; Perturbation; Shimmer; Voice analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032358877     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360.0701.91     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bielamowicz, S., Kreinian. J., Gerratt, B. R., Dauer, M. S., & Berke, G. S. (1996). Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 126-134.
2. Bradley, J. (1986a). Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 837-845.
3. Bradley, J. (1986b). Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 846-854.
4. Doherty, E. T., & Shipp, T. (1988). Tape recorder effects on jitter and shimmer extraction. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 485-490.
5. Hillenbrand, J. (1987). A methodological study of perturbation and additive noise in synthetically generated voice signals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 448-461.
6. Huang, D., Minifie, F., Lin, S., & O'Brien, R. (1996). Dr. Speech. [Computer software]. Winoski, WI: Laureate Learning Systems.
7. Ingrisano, D., Perry, C., & McDonald, E. J. (1995, Fall). Establishing clinical standards in recording speech and voice: One approach. Rocky Mountain Journal of Communication Disorders, 11, 17-21.
8. Karnell, M. P. (1991). Laryngeal perturbation analysis: Minimum length of window analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 544-548.
9. Karnell, M. P., Chang, A., Smith, A., & Hoffman, H. (1996, November). Impact of signal type on validity of perturbation measures. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Seattle, WA.
10. Kay Elemetrics Corporation. (1993). Operations manual: Multidimensional voice program (MDVP) model 4305. Lincoln Park, NJ: Author.
11. Kay Elemetrics Corporation. (1996). Multi-Speech insert to Computerized Speech Lab Options. Lincoln Park, NJ: Author.
12. Laver, J., Hiller, S., & Beck, J. M. (1992). Acoustic waveform perturbations and voice disorders. Journal of Voice, 6, 115-126.
13. Milenkovic, P. H. (1990). CSpeech core user's manual. (Available from Paul Milenkovic, Madison, WI).
14. Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
15. Perry, C., Ingrisano, D., & Blair, W. B. (1996). The influence of recording systems on jitter and shimmer estimates. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5(2), 86-90.
16. Stevens, K. N., Kalikow, K. N., & Willemain, T. R. (1975). A miniature accelerometer for detecting glottal waveforms and nasalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 594-599.
17. Titze, I. R. (1994). Toward standards in acoustic analysis of voice. Journal of Voice, 8, 1-7.
18. Titze, I. R. (1995). Workshop on acoustic voice analysis: Summary statement. National Center for Voice and Speech for the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Denver, CO.
19. 0 extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1120-1133.
20. Titze, I. R., & Winholtz, W. S. (1993). Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1177-1190.