E-learning as evidence of educational scholarship: A survey of chairs of promotion and tenure committees at U.S. medical schools

Academic Medicine

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 47-57

  Ruiz, Jorge G ^a,b,c,e   Candler, Christopher S ^d   Qadri, Syeda Sobiya ^c   Roos, Bernard A ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Stein Gerontological Institute   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e VA GRECC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREER PLANNING; FACULTY PRACTICE; INTERNET; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PILOT STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD; TEACHING; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; INTERNET; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58149378746     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181901004     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Boyer E. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.
2. Glassick C, Huber M, Maeroff G. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1997.
3. Shulman L. The Scholarship of Teaching. Change. 1999;31(5):11-15.
4. Fincher R-ME, Simpson DE, Mennin SP, et al. Scholarship in teaching: An imperative for the 21st century. Acad Med. 2000;75:887-894.
5. Simpson D, Fincher R-ME, Hafler JP, et al. Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Med Educ. 2007;41:1002-1009. (Pubitemid 47508613)
6. Rosenberg M. E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 2001.
7. Gordon JA, Oriol NE, Cooper JB. Bringing good teaching cases "to life": A simulatorbased medical education service. Acad Med. 2004;79:23-27.
8. Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C. Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2007;82:446-451. (Pubitemid 46684406)
9. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Issenberg SB. Learning objects in medical education. Med Teach. 2006;28:599-605.
10. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207-212.
11. Ozuah PO. Undergraduate medical education: Thoughts on future challenges. BMC Med Educ. 2002;2:8.
12. Association of American Medical Colleges. Educating Medical Students. Assessing Change in Medical Education: The Road to Implementation [ACME-TRI Report]. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1992.
13. Candler CS, Uijtdehaage SH, Dennis SE. Introducing HEAL: The Health Education Assets Library. Acad Med. 2003;78:249-253.
14. Reynolds RJ, Candler CS. MedEdPORTAL: Educational scholarship for teaching. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:91-94.
15. Fleming VM, Schindler N, Martin GJ, DaRosa DA. Separate and equitable promotion tracks for clinician - educators. JAMA. 2005;294:1101-1104. (Pubitemid 41248452)
16. Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancesco J Jr, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB. Promotion criteria for clinician- educators in the United States and Canada: A survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA. 1997;278: 723-728.
17. Association of American Medical Colleges. Directory of US and Canadian Medical Schools. Available at: (http://www.aamc.org/ medicalschools.htm). Accessed September 23, 2008.
18. Bickel J, Whiting BE. Comparing the representation and promotion of men and women faculty at U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1991;66:497.
19. Jones RF. Clinician - educator faculty tracks in U.S. medical schools. J Med Educ. 1987;62: 444-447.
20. Alexander H. Report on Faculty Tracks With Research Expectations. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2005. Publication RB05-1.
21. Ruiz JG, Candler C, Teasdale TA. Peer reviewing e-learning: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Acad Med. 2007;82:503-507. (Pubitemid 46684415)
22. Souza KH, Kamin C, O'Sullivan P, Moses A, Heestand D. Organizational models of educational technology in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2008;83:691-699.
23. Bader SA. Are computer-based educational materials recognized as publications? An analysis of promotion documents at American medical colleges. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:747-751.
24. Fincher RM, Work JA. The scholarship of teaching in health science schools. J Vet Med Educ. 2005;32:1-4.
25. Bader SA. Recognition of computer-based materials in the promotion guidelines of U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1993;68(10 suppl):S16-S18.
26. Maker VK, Lewis MJ, Donnelly MB. Ongoing faculty evaluations: Developmental gain or just more pain? Curr Surg. 2006;63:80-84.
27. McKeachie WJ. Student ratings: The validity of use. Am Psychol. 1997;52:1218-1225.
28. Wachtel HK. Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 1998;23:191-211.
29. Thomas PA, Diener-West M, Canto MI, Martin DR, Post WS, Streiff MB. Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2004;79:258-264. (Pubitemid 38269457)
30. Lewis KO, Baker RC. The development of an electronic educational portfolio: An outline for medical education professionals. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19:139-147.
31. Hafler JP, Lovejoy FH Jr. Scholarly activities recorded in the portfolios of teacher - clinician faculty. Acad Med. 2000;75:649-652.
32. Simpson DE, Rehm J, Biernat K, Muchka S, Weissman D. Advancing educational scholarship through the End of Life Physician Education Resource Center (EPERC). J Palliat Med. 1999;2:421-424.