Molecules, morphology, missing data and the phylogenetic position of a recently extinct madtom catfish (Actinopterygii: Ictaluridae)

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 155, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 60-75

  Egge, Jacob J D ^a   Simons, Andrew M ^b  

^a PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Combined Bayesian analysis; Noturus; Systematics

Indexed keywords

ACTINOPTERYGII; ICTALURIDAE; NOTURUS; NOTURUS TRAUTMANI; SILURIFORMES;

EID: 58149352820     PISSN: 00244082     EISSN: 10963642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00432.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson JS. 2001. The phylogenetic trunk: maximal inclusion of taxa with missing data in an analysis of the Lepospondyli (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda). Systematic Biology 50 : 170 193.
2. Asher RJ, Emry RJ, McKenna MC. 2005. New material of Cenetodon (Mammalia, Lipotyphla) and the importance of (missing) DNA sequences in systematic paleontology. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25 : 911 923.
3. Boschung HT, Mayden RL. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Washington, DC : Smithsonian Books.
4. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 : 795 803.
5. Burr BM, Eisenhour DJ, Grady JM. 2005. Two new species of Noturus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) from the Tennessee River drainage: description, distribution, and conservation status. Copeia 2005 : 783 802.
6. Cavender TM. 1984. Scioto madtom survey - 1984-1985. Report on the status of the endangered species, Noturus trautmani. USFWS. Grant No. 30181-1274, FY84.
7. Damgaard J, Andersen NM, Meier R. 2005. Combining molecular and morphological analyses of water strider phylogeny (Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Gerromorpha): effects of alignment and taxon sampling. Systematic Entomology 30 : 289 309.
8. Dingerkus G, Uhler LD. 1977. Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technology 52 : 229 232.
9. Dunn KA, McEachran JD, Honeycutt RL. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of myliobatiform fishes (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes), with comments on the effects of missingdata on parsimony and likelihood. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27 : 259 270.
10. Eernisse DJ, Kluge AG. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10 : 1170 1195.
11. Egge JJD. 2007. The osteology of the stonecat, Noturus flavus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae), with comparisons to other siluriforms. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History 25 : 71 89.
12. Egge JJD, Simons AM. 2006. The challenge of truly cryptic diversity: diagnosis and description of a new madtom catfish (Ictaluridae: Noturus). Zoologica Scripta 35 : 581 595.
13. Etnier DA, Starnes WC. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. Knoxville : The University of Tennessee Press.
14. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 : 783 791.
15. Gao K, Norrell MA. 1998. Taxonomic review of Carusia (Reptilia: Squamata) from the late Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert and phylogenetic relationships of anguimorph lizards. American Museum Novitates 3230 : 1 51.
16. Gatesy J, Milinkovitch M, Waddell V, Stanhope M. 1999. Stability of cladistic relationships between Cetacea and higher-level Artiodactyl taxa. Systematic Biology 48 : 6 20.
17. Grady JM. 1987. Biochemical systematics and evolution of the ictalurids catfish genus Noturus (Pisces, Siluriformes) (Missouri, Tennessee). D. Phil. Thesis, Southern Illinois University.
18. Grady JM, LeGrande WH. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships, modes of speciation, and historical biogeography of the madtom catfishes, genus Noturus Rafinesque (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae). In : Mayden RL, ed. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, 747 777.
19. Hardman M. 2004. The phylogenetic relationships among Noturus catfishes (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) as inferred from mitochondrial gene cytochrome b and nuclear recombination activating gene 2. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30 : 395 408.
20. Hubbs CL, Lagler KF. 1964. Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. Ann Arbor, MI : The University of Michigan Press.
21. Hughes J, Vogler AP. 2004. The phylogeny of acorn weevils (genus Curculio) from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences: the problem of incomplete data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32 : 601 615.
22. Jenkins RE, Burkhead NM. 1994. Fishes of Virginia. Bethesda, MD : American Fisheries Society.
23. Kass RE, Raftery AE. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 : 773 795.
24. Kearney M. 2002. Fragmentary taxa, missing data, and ambiguity: mistaken assumptions and conclusions. Systematic Biology 51 : 369 381.
25. Kearney M, Clark JM. 2003. Problems due to missing data in phylogenetic analyses including fossils: a critical review. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23 : 263 274.
26. Langecker TG, Longley G. 1992. Blind catfish (Trogloglanis pattersoni and Satan eurystomus) from deep artesian waters: a study on convergent adaptation to cave and deep sea biota. GSF-Bericht 7 : 239 255.
27. Lewis PO. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50 : 913 925.
28. Lundberg JG. 1970. The evolutionary history of North American catfishes, family Ictaluridae. D. Phil. Thesis, University of Michigan.
29. Lundberg JG. 1982. The comparative anatomy of the toothless blindcat, Trogloglanis pattersoni Eigenmann, with a phylogenetic analysis of ictalurid catfishes. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 163 : 1 85.
30. Lundberg JG. 1992. The phylogeny of ictalurid catfishes: a synthesis of recent work. In : Mayden RL, ed. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, 392 420.
31. Near TJ, Hardman M. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of Noturus stanauli and N. crypticus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae), two imperiled freshwater fish species from the southeastern United States. Copeia 2006 : 378 383.
32. Nixon KC, Wheeler QD. 1992. Extinction and the origin of species. In : Novacek MN, Wheeler QD, eds. Extinction and phylogeny. New York : Columbia University Press, 119 143.
33. Norrell MA, Wheeler WC. 2003. Missing entry replacement data analysis: a replacement approach to dealing with missing data in paleontological and total evidence data sets. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23 : 275 283.
34. Novacek MJ. 1992. Fossils, topologies, missing data, and the higher level phylogeny of eutherian mammals. Systematic Biology 41 : 58 73.
35. Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey JL. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 53 : 47 67.
36. O'Leary MA. 1999. Parsimony analysis of total evidence from extinct and extant taxa, and the cetacean-artiodactyl question. Cladistics 15 : 315 330.
37. Pflieger WL. 1997. Fishes of Missouri, 2nd edn. Jefferson City, MO : Missouri Department of Conservation.
38. Phillippe H, Snell EA, Bapteste E, Lopez P, Holland PWH, Casane D. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 : 1740 1752.
39. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 : 817 818.
40. Potthoff T. 1984. Clearing and staining techniques. In : Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall W Jr., Richardson SL, eds. Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Special Publication No. 1. Lawrence, KS : Allen Press, 35 37.
41. Robison HW, Buchanan TM. 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. Fayetteville, AK : The University of Arkansas Press.
42. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 : 1572 1574.
43. Ross ST. 2001. Inland fishes of Mississippi. Jackson, MS : University Press of Mississippi.
44. Schander C, Halanych KM. 2003. DNA, PCR and formalized animal tissue - a short review and protocols. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 3 : 195 205.
45. Sorenson MD. 1999. TreeRot, version 2. Boston, MA : Boston University.
46. Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S. 2002. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. American Journal of Pathology 161 : 1961 1971.
47. Swofford DL. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) [Computer Software Manual Sunderland, MA : Sinauer Associates.
48. Taylor WR. 1969. A revision of the catfish genus Noturus Rafinesque with an analysis of higher groups in the Ictaluridae. United States National Museum Bulletin 282 : 1 315.
49. Trautman MB. 1957. Fishes of Ohio. Columbus, OH : Ohio State University Press.
50. Wasserman L. 2000. Bayesian model selection and model averaging. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 44 : 92 107.
51. Wiens J. 2003a. Incomplete taxa, incomplete characters, and phylogenetic accuracy: is there a missing data problem? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23 : 297 310.
52. Wiens J. 2003b. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 52 : 528 538.
53. Wiens J. 2005. Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Systematic Biology 54 : 731 742.
54. Wiens J, Reeder TW. 1995. Combining data sets with different numbers of taxa for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 44 : 548 558.
55. Wilcox TP, García de León FJ, Hendrickson DA, Hillis DM. 2004. Convergence among cave catfishes: long-branch attraction and a Bayesian relative rates test. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31 : 1101 1113.
56. Wilkinson M. 1995. Coping with abundant missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Systematic Biology 44 : 501 514.
57. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1996. Noturus trautmani. In : IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 5 February 2007.