Phylogenetic relationships of Noturus stanauli and N. crypticus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae), two imperiled freshwater fish species from the Southeastern United States

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 3, 2006, Pages 378-383

  Near, Thomas J ^a,c   Hardman, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CYTOCHROME; FISH; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS;

DUCK RIVER; NORTH AMERICA; TENNESSEE; TENNESSEE RIVER; UNITED STATES;

ICTALURIDAE; NOTURUS; NOTURUS BAILEYI; NOTURUS ELEGANS; NOTURUS HILDEBRANDI; NOTURUS STANAULI; SILURIFORMES;

EID: 33749522241     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2006)2006[378:PRONSA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BOSCHUNG, H. T., JR., AND R. L. MAYDEN. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.
2. BURR, B. M., D. J. EISENHOUR, AND J. M. GRADY. 2005. Two new species of Noturus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) from the Tennessee River Drainage: description, distribution, and conservation status. Copeia 2005:783-802.
3. _, AND J. N. STOECKEL. 1999. The natural history of madtoms (genus Noturus), North America's diminutive catfishes. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 24:51-101.
4. DAUGHERTY, C. H., A. CREE, J. M. HAY, AND M. B. THOMPSON. 1990. Neglected taxonomy and continuing extinctions of tuatara (Sphenodon). Nature 347:177-179.
5. ETNIER, D. A. 1997. Jeopardized southeastern freshwater fishes: a search for causes, p. 87-104. In: Aquatic Fauna in Peril: The Southeastern Perspective. G. W. Benz and D. E. Collins (eds.). Southeast Aquatic Research Institute, Decatur, Georgia.
6. _, AND R. E. JENKINS. 1980. Noturus stanauli, a new madtom catfish (Ictaluridae) from the Clinch and Duck Rivers, Tennessee. Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. 5:17-22.
7. _, AND W. C. STARNES. 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
8. FAITH, D. P. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61:1-10.
9. GRADY, J. M., AND W. H. LEGRANDE. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships, modes of speciation, and historical biogeography of the madtom catfishes, genus Noturus Rafinesque (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae), p. 747-777. In: Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. R. L. Mayden (ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford.
10. HARDMAN, M. 2004. The phylogenetic relationships among Noturus catfishes (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) as inferred from mitochondrial gene cytochrome b and nuclear recombination activating gene 2. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30:395-408.
11. _, AND L. M. PAGE. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among bullhead catfishes of the genus Ameiurus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae). Copeia 2003:20-33.
12. HARDY, M. E., J. M. GRADY, AND E. J. ROUTMAN. 2002. Intraspecific phylogeography of the slender madtom: the complex evolutionary history of the Central Highlands of the United States. Mol. Ecol. 11:2393-2403.
13. HUDSON, R. R., AND J. A. COYNE. 2002. Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56:1557-1565.
14. HUELSENBECK, J. P., F. RONQUIST, R. NIELSEN, AND J. P. BOLLBACK. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
15. LANG, N. J., S. L. POWERS, AND R. L. MAYDEN. 2005. Status of the Noturus elegans species complex in the Middle and Upper Tennessee River Drainage. Southeast. Nat. 4:585-596.
16. LARGET, B., AND D. L. SIMON. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
17. LYDEARD, C., AND R. L. MAYDEN. 1995. A diverse and endangered aquatic ecosystem of the southeast United States. Conserv. Biol. 9:800-805.
18. MACE, G. M., J. L. GITTLEMAN, AND A. PURVIS. 2003. Preserving the Tree of Life. Science 300:1707-1709.
19. MORITZ, C., AND D. P. FAITH. 1998. Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation. Mol. Ecol. 7:419-429.
20. PAGE, L. M., M. HARDMAN, AND T. J. NEAR. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of barcheek darters (Percidae: Etheostoma, Subgenus Catonotus) with descriptions of two new species. Copeia 2003:512-530.
21. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
22. RAKES, P. L., J. R. SHUTE, AND P. W. SHUTE. 1999. Reproductive behavior, captive breeding, and restoration ecology of endangered fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 55:31-42.
23. RONQUIST, F., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
24. SECHREST, W., T. M. BROOKS, G. A. B. DA FONSECA, W. R. KONSTANT, R. A. MITTERMEIER, A. PURVIS, A. B. RYLANDS, AND J. L. GITTLEMAN. 2002. Hotspots and the conservation of evolutionary history. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2067-2071.
25. SHUTE, J. R., P. L. RAKES, AND P. W. SHUTE. 2005. Reintroduction of four imperiled fishes in Abrams Creek, Tennessee. Southeast. Nat. 4:93-110.
26. TAYLOR, W. R. 1969. A revision of the catfish genus Noturus Rafinesque with an analysis of higher groups in the Ictaluridae. Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 282:1-315.
27. THOMAS, M. R., AND B. M. BURR. 2004. Noturus gladiator, a new species of madtom (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) from Coastal Plain streams of Tennessee and Mississippi. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters 15:351-368.
28. WARREN, M. L., B. M. BURR, S. J. WALSH, H. L. BART, R. C. CASHNER, D. A. ETNIER, B. J. FREEMAN, B. R. KUHAJDA, R. L. MAYDEN, H. W. ROBISON, S. T. ROSS, AND W. C. STARNES. 2000. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries 25:7-31.
29. WILCOX, T. P., F. J. G. DE LEON, D. A. HENDRICKSON, AND D. M. HILLIS. 2004. Convergence among cave catfishes: long-branch attraction and a Bayesian relative rates test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:1101-1113.