Analyzing "Inconsistencies" in practice: Teachers' continued use of round robin reading

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 87-103

  Ash, Gwynne Ellen ^a   Kuhn, Melanie R ^b   Walpole, Sharon ^c  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149335145     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10573560802491257     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allington, R. L. (1977) If they don't read much, how are they ever going to get good?. Journal of Reading, 21, pp. 57-61.
2. Allington, R. L. (1980) Teacher interruption behaviors during primary grade oral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, pp. 371-377.
3. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Sikes, J., Stephan, C. and Snapp, M. (1978) The jigsaw classroom, Sage., Beverly Hills, Calif.:
4. Aronson, E., Blaney, N. T., Stephan, C., Rosen Field, R. and Sikes, J. (1977) Interdependence in the classroom: A field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, pp. 121-128.
5. Ash, G. E. (2000) Middle school literacy teachers' ethical stances and role perceptions, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia
6. Ash, G. E. and Kuhn, M. R. (2001) Round Robin Reading Anonymous. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference Investigating inservice and preservice teachers' continued pursuit of round robin reading
7. Ash, G. E., Kuhn, M. R. and Walpole, S. (2003) Flying in the face of research: Inservice teachers and their use of round robin reading research in progress. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference
8. Ash, G. E. and Kuhn, M. R. (2006) Fluency instruction: Research-based best practices, pp. 155-172. New York: Guilford
9. Baker, J. M. and Zigmond, N. (1990) Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities?. Exceptional Children, 56:6, pp. 515-526.
10. Cox, C. and Zarrillo, J. (1993) Teaching reading with children's literature, MacMillan., New York:
11. Cunningham, P. M. and Allington, R. L. (1999) Classrooms that work. They can all read and write (, Longman, New York
12. Fang, Z. (1996) A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38, pp. 47-65.
13. Fosnot, C. T. (1996) Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, pp. 8-33. Columbia University, Teachers College Press, New York
14. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. and Burish, P. (2002) Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, pp. 85-91.
15. Gunter, M., Estes, T. and Schwab, J. (1995) Instruction: A models approach, Allyn & Bacon., Needham Heights, MA:
16. (1995) The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing, International Reading Association., Newark, Del.:
17. Ivey, G. (1999) A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34:2, pp. 172-192.
18. Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Morris, R. D., Morrow, L. M., Woo, D. G. and Meisinger, E. B. (2006) Teaching children to become fluent and automatic readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38:4, pp. 357-387.
19. LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S. J. (1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, pp. 293-323.
20. Manning, K. (1997) Authenticity in constructivist inquiry: Methodological considerations without prescription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3:1, pp. 93-115.
21. Moje, E. B. (1996) "I teach students, not subjects": Teacher-students relationships as contexts for secondary literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 31:2, pp. 172-195.
22. Moody, S. W., Vaughn, S. and Schumm, J. S. (1997) Instructional grouping for reading: Teachers' views. Remedial and Special Education, 18, pp. 347-356.
23. (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
24. Opitz, M. F. and Rasinski, T. V. (1998) Good-bye Round Robin, Heinemann., Portsmouth, NH
25. Pajares, M. F. (1992) Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62:3, pp. 307-332.
26. Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, pp. 117-175.
27. Santa, C. M., Isaacson, L. and Manning, G. (1987) Changing content instruction through action research. The Reading Teacher, 40:4, pp. 434-438.
28. Schumm, J. S. and Vaughn, S. (1991) Making adaptations for mainstreamed students: General classroom teachers' perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 12, pp. 18-27.
29. Schwandt, T. A. (1994) Handbook of qualitative research, pp. 118-137. Sage., Thousand Oaks, Calif.:
30. Schwanenflugel, P. and Bradley, B. (2006) Teaching children to become fluent readers: An analysis of a multi-site study. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference
31. Stanovich, K. E. (1980) Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, pp. 32-71.
32. Stanovich, K. E. (1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, pp. 360-407.
33. Wolf, S. A. (1998) The flight of reading: Shifts in instruction, orchestration, and attitudes through classroom theatre. Reading Research Quarterly, 33:4, pp. 382-415.
34. Wood, M. (1998) Whose job is it anyway? Educational roles in inclusion. Exceptional Children, 64:2, pp. 181-195.