The effects of learning goal difficulty level and cognitive ability on performance

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 220-229

  Latham, Gary P ^a,c   Seijts, Gerard ^b,d   Crim, Dan ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cognitive ability; Learning goal; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149328433     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013114     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ackerman, P. L., Kanfer, R., & Goff, M. (1995). Cognitive and non-cognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 270-304.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Bandura, A., & Simon, K. M. (1977). The role of proximal intentions in self regulation of refractory behaviour. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 177-193.
4. Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 544-557.
5. Brown, T. C., & Latham, G. P. (2002). The effects of behavioural outcome goals, learning goals, and urging people to do their best on an individual's teamwork behaviour in a group problem-solving task. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 276-285.
6. Cervone, D., Jiwani, N., & Wood, R. (1991). Goal setting and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on complex decision-making performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 257-266.
7. DeShon, R. P., Brown, K. G., & Greenis, J. L. (1996). Does self-regulation require cognitive resources? Evaluation of resource allocation models of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 595-608.
8. Drach-Zahavy, A., & Erez, M. (2002). Challenge versus threat effects on the goal-performance relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 667-682.
9. Earley, P. C. (1985). Influence of information, choice, and task complexity upon goal acceptance, performance, and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 481-491.
10. Earley, P. C., Connolly, T., & Ekegren, G. (1989). Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 24-33.
11. Eden, D. (2002). Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ's publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 841-846.
12. Frese, M. (2005). Grand theories and midrange theories. Cultural effects on theorizing and the attempt to understand active approaches to work. In K. G. Smith & M. Hitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management theory: The process of theory development. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Hunter, J. E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 29, 340-362.
14. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
15. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
16. Kaplan, E., Erez, M., & Van-Dijk, D. (2004, April). Reconciling potential differences between the goal setting and self regulation theories. In M. Erez (Chair), Goal setting, goal orientation, and self regulation focus: An integration. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago.
17. Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2005). Self-regulation in error management training: Emotion control and meta cognition as mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology. 90, 677-691.
18. Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wright, P. M., & DeShon. R. P. (2001). The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 85, 32-55.
19. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 900-916.
20. Latham, G. P. (2007). Work motivation: History, theories, research, and practice. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
21. Latham, G. P., & Baldes, J. J. (1975). The "practical significance" of Locke's theory of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 122-124.
22. Latham, G. P., & Brown, T. C. (2006). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on self efficacy and satisfaction in an MBA program. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 623.
23. Latham, G. P., & Lee, T. W. (1986). Goal setting. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 101-117). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
24. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments and directions for goal setting. European Psychologist, 12, 290-300.
25. Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1982). The importance of union acceptance for productivity improvement through goal setting. Personnel Psychology, 35, 781-787.
26. Locke, E A. (1965). Interaction of ability and motivation in performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 719-725.
27. Locke, E. A. (1982). Relation of goal level to performance with a short time period and multiple goal levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 512-514.
28. Locke, E. A. (2000). Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 408-429.
29. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
31. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2005). Goal setting theory: Theory building by induction. In M. Hitt & K. G. Smith (Eds.), Oxford handbook of management theory: The process of theory development. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
33. Mitchell, T. R., & Daniels, D. (2003). Motivation. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial organizational psychology (pp. 225-254). New York: Wiley
34. Mone, M. A., & Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of task complexity and goal specificity on change in strategy and performance over time. Human Performance, 8, 249-262.
35. Noel, T. W., & Latham, G. P. (2006). The importance of learning goals versus outcome goals for entrepreneurs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7, 213-220.
36. Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321-332.
37. Schmidt, A. M., & Ford, J. K. (2003). Learning within a learner control training environment: The interaction effects of goal orientation and metacognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 56, 405-429.
38. Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2001). The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 291-302.
39. Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2005). Learning versus performance goals: When should each be used? Academy of Management Executive, 19, 1, 124-131.
40. Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227-239.
41. Terborg, J. R., & Miller, H. E. (1978). Motivation, behavior and performance: A closer examination of goal setting and monetary incentives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 29-39.
42. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
43. Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 235-250.
44. Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam User's Manual. (2002). Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic Inc.
45. Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60-82.
46. Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 416-425.