Assessing the evidence supporting the claims of select dental implant surfaces: A systematic review

International Dental Journal

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 363-370

  Bhatavadekar, Neel ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Claims; Dental implant; Evidence

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED DENTISTRY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58149260401     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00358.x     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB et al. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 2003 53: 409-443.
2. Center for Evidence Based Medicine. Levels of evidence. Available at http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Last accessed: 3/2/2008.
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/implant. Last accessed: 2/20/2008
4. Nobel Biocare brochure. 'TiUnite', 9594 C GB0507; 'TiUnite - New Dimensions', 15808 GB0504, Nobel Biocare Services AG, 2005.
5. .http://biomet3i.com/English/products/ExternalHex/Osseotite/ General-Information/OptimizesTheHealingProcess.cfm;/ContactOsteogenesis.cfm;/ GreaterBoneHealingConfirmed.cfm;/DemonstratedLongTermPredictability.cfm. Last accessed 10/7/2007.
6. http://www.straumann.us/us-index/pc-us-products/pc- us-implant-lines. htm;/pc-us-slactive.htm;/pc-us-rationale. htm?step=all;/pc-us-surface- innovation.htm. Last accessed 11/20/2007;
7. Straumann Scientific Research Summaries, 08/07, Institut Straumann AG 2007;
8. Starget Focus: SLActive Scientific Studies, 01/07, 152.911e, Institut Straumann AG 2007.
9. Astra Tech company publication. 'Insight' 2001 Vol.4 No. 2, 75296-USX-0108;
10. 2006, Vol.8, No.1,78424-USX-0601;
11. Astra Tech Documentation Summaries, Issue 5, 78945-USX-0710, Astra Tech AB, 2007.
12. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.2.5. http://www.cochrane.org/resources/ handbook/. Last accessed: 2/10/2008.
13. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U et al. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998 106: 527-551.
14. Esposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 25:CD003815.
15. Visser A, Geertman ME, Meijer HJ et al. Five years of aftercare of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2002 29: 113-120.
16. Boerrigter EM, van Oort RP, Raghoebar GM et al. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Mar;24(3):182-90.
17. Bain CA, Weng D, Meltzer A et al. A meta-analysis evaluating the risk for implant failure in patients who smoke. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002 Aug;23(8):695-9, 702, 704
18. TeerlinkJ Quirynen, Darius, van Steenberghe. Periotest: An objective clinical assessment of bone apposition towards implant. Int J Oral Max Implants 1991 6: 55-61.
19. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 15: 142-149.
20. Payne AG, Tawse-Smith A, Duncan WD et al. Conventional and early loading of unsplinted ITI implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002 13: 603-609.
21. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Lazza A et al. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002 13: 495-501.
22. Buser D, Broginni N, Weiland etal. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004 83: 529-533.
23. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M et al. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontal 2001 34: 78-86.
24. Schwarz F, Sager M, Ferrari D et al. Bone regeneration in dehiscencetype defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontal 2008 35: 64-75.
25. Hench LL, Ethridge EC. Biomaterials: An interfacial approach, pp 20-55. New York: Academic, 1982.
26. Albrektsson, Wennenberg. Oral Implant Surfaces: Part I. Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004 17: 536-543.
27. Stanford C, Wagner W, Rodriguez Y etal. Multicenter Clinical Evaluation (FOCUS) of a Fluoride Modified Dental Implant, abstract # 0050. Paper presented at: IADR; March 21-23, 2007; New Orleans.
28. Abrahamsson I, Albouy JP, Berglundh T. Healing at fluoride-modified implants placed in wide marginal defects: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008 19: 153-159. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
29. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Albouy JP et al. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007 18: 147-152.
30. Albrektsson, Zarb, Worthington et al. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Max Implants 1986 11-25.
31. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson. Tissue integrated prosthesis. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry, pp 199-210. Chicago. IL: Quintessence, 1985.
32. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psycho Meas 1960 20: 37-46.
33. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker, Van't hof MA et al Implant surface roughness and bone healing A systematic review. J Dent Res 2006 85: 495-500.
34. Moher D,Schultz K, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. JAMA 2001 285: 1987-1991.
35. www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/1389.html. Last accessed: 3/19/2008
36. Bhatavadekar NB. Implants and Implant surface studies- quality of evidence. Starget 2007 (3); 55-60. Nobel Biocare studies:
37. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI Dental Implants and Brånemark System implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004 63: 130-141.
38. da Cunha HA, Francischone CE, Filho HN et al. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth implants under immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004 19: 578-585.
39. Astrand P, Billstrom C, Feldmann H et al. Tapered implants in jaws with soft bone quality: a clinical and radiographic 1-year study of the Brånemark System Mark IV fixture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003 5: 213-218.
40. Friberg B, Jisander S, Widmark G et al. One-year prospective three-center study comparing the outcome of a "soft bone implant" (prototype Mk IV) and the standard Brånemark implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003 5: 71-77.
41. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Brånemark System TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003 5 Suppl 1: 57-63.
42. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B et al. Nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002 4: 115-127.
43. Moberg LE, Kondell PA, Sagulin GB et al. Brånemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Can Oral Implants Res 2001 12: 450-461.
44. Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM et al. Mandibular over-dentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998 9: 374-383.
45. Naert IE, Duyck JA, Hosny MM et al. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 12: 245-251. 3i studies:
46. Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L et al. Interproximal papilla levels following early versus delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005 20: 753-761.
47. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A et al. Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report. J Clin Periodontal 2005 32: 480-487.
48. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 18: 189-199.
49. Stach RM, Kohles SS. A meta-analysis examining the clinical surviv-ability of machined-surfaced and osseotite implants in poor-quality bone. Implant Dent 2003 12: 87-96. Straumann studies:
50. Fischer K, Stenberg T. Three-year data from a randomizd, controlled study of early loading of single-stage dental implants supporting maxillary full-arch prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006 21: 245-252.
51. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI Dental Implants and Brånemark System implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004 6: 130-141.
52. Fischer K, Stenberg T. Early loading of ITI implants supporting a maxillary full-arch prosthesis: 1-year data of a prospective, randomized study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004 19: 374-381.
53. Bianchi AE, Sanfilippo F. Single-tooth replacement by immediate implant and connective tissue graft: a 1-9-year clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 5: 269-277.
54. Meijer HJ, Heijdenrijk K, Raghoebar GM. Mucosal and radiographic aspects during the healing period of implants placed in a one-stage procedure. Int J Prosthodont 2003 16: 397-402.
55. Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ et al. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 18: 424-432.
56. Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ etal. Two-stage IMZ implants and ITI implants inserted in a single-stage procedure. A prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002 13: 371-80.
57. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F et al. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 12: 572-578.
58. Moberg LE, Kondell PA, Sagulin GB et al. Brånemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 12: 450-461.
59. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U et al. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998 106: 527-551. Astra Tech studies:
60. Wennstrom JL, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K et al. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed partial dentures in periodontitis- susceptible subjects. A 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2004 31: 713-724.
61. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S et al. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 15: 413-420.
62. Cecchinato D, Olsson C, Lindhe J. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients. J Clin Periodontal 2004 31: 299-308.
63. Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S et al. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002 13: 30-37.
64. Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U. A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with machined and TiO2-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001 10: 2-7.
65. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S et al. Astra Tech and Branemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat RMI 999 1: 17-26.
66. van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Quirynen M et al. A prospective splitmouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 11: 202-209.