Yield stability evaluation of peanut lines: A comparison of an experimental versus a simulation approach

Field Crops Research

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 168-175

  Banterng, P ^a   Patanothai, A ^a   Pannangpetch, K ^a   Jogloy, S ^a   Hoogenboom, G ^b  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

Crop simulation model; CROPGRO Peanut; Genotype x environment interactions; Plant breeding; Yield trials

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENES; PLANTS (BOTANY);

CROP SIMULATION MODEL; CROPGRO-PEANUT; GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS; PLANT BREEDING; YIELD STABILITY; YIELD TRIALS;

CROPS;

AGRICULTURAL MODELING; CROP IMPROVEMENT; CROP YIELD; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GROUNDNUT; PLANT BREEDING;

FARM CROPS; GENES; GENOTYPES; PLANTS; SIMULATION;

ASIA; EURASIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA; THAILAND;

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 31444439122     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. P.K. Aggarwal, and N. Kalra Analyzing the limitation set by climatic factors, genotype, and water and nitrogen availability on productivity of wheat: II. Climatically potential yields and management strategies Field Crops Res. 38 1994 93 103
2. P.K. Aggarwal, R.B. Matthews, and M.J. Kropff Opportunities for the application of systems approaches in plant breeding P.K. Aggarwal R.B. Matthews M.J. Kropff H.H. van Laar SARP Research Proceedings International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines 1995 135 144
3. P. Banterng, A. Patanothai, K. Pannangpetch, S. Jogloy, and G. Hoogenboom Determination and evaluation of genetic coefficients of peanut lines for breeding applications Eur. J. Agron. 21 2004 297 310
4. K.J. Boote, J.W. Jones, and G. Hoogenboom Simulation of crop growth: CROPGRO model R.M. Peart R.B. Curry Agricultural Systems Modeling and Simulation 1998 Marcel Dekker Inc. New York 651 692
5. C.S. Chapman, G.L. Hammer, D.G. Butler, and M. Cooper Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III: Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments Aust. J. Agric. Res. 51 2000 223 233
6. S.A. Eberhart, and W.A. Russell Stability parameters for comparing varieties Crop Sci. 6 1966 36 40
7. D.B. Egli, and W. Bruening Planting date and soybean yield: evaluation of environmental effect with a crop simulation model: SOYGRO Agric. For. Meteorol. 62 1992 19 29
8. K.A. Gomez, and A.A. Gomez Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research 1984 John Wiley & Sons New York
9. H.G. Gauch, and R.E. Furnas Statistical analysis of yield trials with MATMODEL Agron. J. 83 1991 916 920
10. G. Hoogenboom, J.W. Jones, and K.T. Boote Modeling growth, development, and yield of grain legumes using SOYGRO, PNUTGRO, and BEANGRO: a review Trans. ASAE 35 1992 2043 2056
11. G. Hoogenboom, and J.W. White Improving physiological assumptions of simulation models by using gene-based approaches Agron. J. 95 2003 82 89
12. G. Hoogenboom, J.W. White, J. Acosta-Gallegos, R. Gaudiel, J.R. Myers, and M.J. Silbernagel Evaluation of a crop simulation model that incorporates gene action Agron. J. 89 1997 613 620
13. G. Hoogenboom, J.W. White, and C.D. Messina From genome to crop: integration through simulation modeling Field Crop Res. 90 2004 145 163
14. G. Hoogenboom P.W. Wilkens G.Y. Tsuji DSSAT Version 3 vol. 4 1999 University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii
15. L.A. Hunt, S. Pararajasingham, and J.V. Wiersma Effects of planting date on the development and yield of spring wheat: simulation of field data Can. J. Plant Sci. 76 1996 51 58
16. L.A. Hunt, J.W. White, and G. Hoogenboom Agronomic data: advances in documentation and protocols for exchange and use Agric. Syst. 70 2001 477 492
17. J.W. Jones, G.Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, L.A. Hunt, P.K. Thornton, P.W. Wilkens, D.T. Imamura, W.T. Bowen, and U. Singh Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer: DSSAT v3 G.Y. Tsuji G. Hoogenboom P.K. Thornton Understanding Options for Agricultural Production 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers London 157 177
18. P. Kaur, and S.S. Hundal Forcasting growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) with a dynamic simulation model 'PNUTGRO' under Punjab conditions J. Agric. Sci. 133 1999 167 173
19. C.S. Lin, M.R. Binns, and L.P. Lefkovitc Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26 1986 894 900
20. T. Mavromatis, K.J. Boote, J.W. Jones, A. Irmak, D. Shinde, and G. Hoogenboom Developing genetic coefficients for crop simulation models with data from crop performance trials Crop Sci. 41 2001 40 51
21. C.G. Mclaren Combining statistics and crop models for improved plant breeding strategies P.K. Aggarwal R.B. Matthews M.J. Kropff H.H. van Laar SARP Research Proceedings International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines 1994 41 47
22. H. Meinke, and G.L. Hammer A peanut simulation model: II. Assessing regional production potential Agron. J. 87 1995 1093 1099
23. H. Meinke, G.L. Hammer, and S.C. Chapman A sunflower simulation model: II. Simulating production risks in a variable subtropical environment Agron. J. 85 1993 735 742
24. M.M. Nachit, G. Nachit, H. Ketata, H.G. Gauch, and R.W. Zobel Use of AMMI and linear regression models to analyze genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat Theor. Appl. Genet. 83 1992 597 601
25. S. Palanisamy, P.K. Aggarwal, T.M. Thiyagarajan, and T.B. Ranganathan Simulating yields and ranking of rice genotype in multi-location trials P.K. Aggarwal R.B. Matthews M.J. Kropff H.H. van Laar SARP Research Proceedings International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines 1995 91 95
26. A. Patanothai, and R.E. Atkins Yield stability of single crosses and three-way hybrids of grain sorghum Crop Sci. 14 1974 287 290
27. F.W.T. Penning de Vries P. Teng K. Metselaar Systems Approaches for Agricultural Development 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands
28. I. Romagosa, and P.N. Fox Genotype × environment interaction and adaptation M.D. Hayward N.O. Bosemark I. Romagosa Plant Breeding, Principles and Prospects 1993 Chapman & Hall London 373 387
29. P. Singh, K.J. Boote, and S.M. Virmani Evaluation of the groundnut model PNUTGRO for crop response to plant population and row spacing Field Crops Res. 39 1994 163 170
30. P. Singh, K.J. Boote, A.Y. Rao, M.R. Iruthayaraj, A.M. Sheikh, S.S. Hundal, R.S. Narang, and P. Singh Evaluation of the groundnut model PNUTGRO for crop response to water availability, sowing dates, and seasons Field Crops Res. 39 1994 147 162
31. G.Y. Tsuji J.W. Jones S. Balas DSSAT Version 3 1994 University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii
32. J.W. White Modeling and crop improvement G.Y. Tsuji G. Hoogenboom P.K. Thornton Understanding Options for Agricultural Production 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands 179 188
33. J.W. White, and G. Hoogenboom Simulating effects of genes for physiological traits in a process-oriented crop model Agron. J. 88 1996 416 422
34. J.W. White, G. Hoogenboom, J.W. Jones, and K.J. Boote Evaluation of dry bean model Beangro V1.01 for crop production research in a tropical environment Exp. Agric. 31 1995 241 254
35. R.W. Zobel, M.J. Wright, and H.G. Gauch Statistical analysis of a yield trial Agron. J. 80 1988 388 393