Can spring wheat-growing megaenvironments in the northern Great Plains be dissected for representative locations or niche-adapted genotypes?

Crop Science

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1107-1116

  Navabi, Alireza ^a   Yang, Rong Cai ^a   Helm, James ^b   Spaner, Dean M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 33646454109     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0159     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baker, R.J. 1988. Tests for crossover genotype-environmental interactions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:405-410.
2. Cochran, W.G., and G.M. Cox. 1957. Experimental designs. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
3. Cornelius, P.L., M. Seyedsadr, and J. Crossa. 1992. Using the shifted multiplicative model to search for "separability" in crop cultivar trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:161-172.
4. Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa, and M.S. Seyedsadr. 1996. Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction, p. 199-234. In M. S. Kang and H. G. Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
5. Crossa, J., P.L. Cornelius, and W. Yan. 2002. Biplots of linear-bilinear models for studying crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci. 42:619-633.
6. Crossa, J., P.L. Cornelius, M. Seyedsadr, and P. Byrne. 1993. A shifted multiplicative model cluster analysis for grouping environments without genotypic rank change. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:577-586.
7. DeLacy, I.H., K.E. Basford, M. Cooper, J.K. Bull, and C.G. McLaren. 1996. Analysis of multi-environment trials- an historical perspective, p. 39-124. In M. Cooper and G. L. Hammer (ed.) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International. Walingford, UK.
8. Gauch, H.G., and R.W. Zobel. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials, p. 1-40. In M. S. Kang and H. G. Gauch (ed.) genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.
9. Gauch, H.G., and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311-326.
10. Lillemo, M., M. van Ginkel, R.M. Trethowan, E. Hernandez, and S. Rajaram. 2004. Associations among international CIMMYT bread wheat yield testing locations in high rainfall areas and their implications for wheat breeding. Crop Sci. 44:1163-1169.
11. Padbury, G., S. Waltman, J. Capiro, G. Coen, S. McGinn, D. Mortensen, G. Nielsen, and R. Sinclair. 2002. Agroecosystems and land resources of the northern great plains. Agron. J. 94:251-261.
12. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide. V. 8.0. SAS Institute., Cary, NC.
13. Seyedsadr, M., and P.L. Cornelius. 1992. Shifted multiplicative models for nonadditive two-way tables. Comm. Statist. B. Simul. Comp. 21:807-832.
14. Trethowan, R.M., J. Crossa, M. van Ginkel, and S. Rajaram. 2001. Relationships among bread wheat international yield testing locations in dry areas. Crop Sci. 41:1461-1469.
15. Yan, W., and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci. 41:19-25.
16. Yan, W., P.L. Cornelius, J. Crossa, and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Sci. 41:656-663.
17. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40:597-605.
18. Yang, R.C., S.F. Blade, J. Crossa, D. Stanton, and M.S. Bandara. 2005. Identifying isoyield environments for field pea production. Crop Sci. 45:106-113.