Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot

Crop Science

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 597-605

  Yan, Weikai ^a   Hunt, L A ^a   Sheng, Qinglai ^a   Szlavnics, Zorka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CROSSING OVER; CULTIVAR; ENVIRONMENT; EVALUATION; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; WHEAT;

EID: 0034044118     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Braun, H.-J., S. Rajaram, and M. Van Ginel. 1996. CIMMYT's approach to breeding for wide adaptation. Euphytica 92:175-183.
2. Cooper, M., R.E. Stucker, I.H. DeLacy, and B.D. Harch. 1997. Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci. 37:1168-1176.
3. Cornelius, P.L. 1993. Statistical tests and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 33:1186-1193.
4. Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa, and M.S. Seyedsadr. 1993. Tests and estimators of multiplicative models for variety trials. p. 156-169. In W. Noble (ed.) Proceedings of the 1993 Kansas State University Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture.
5. Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa, and M.S. Seyedsader. 1996. Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction. p. 199-234. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton. FL.
6. Crossa, J., and P.L. Cornelius. 1997. Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci. 37:405-415.
7. DeLacy, I.H., K.E. Basford, M. Cooper, J.K. Bull, and C.G. McLaren. 1996. Analysis of multi-environment trials - A historical perspective, p. 39-124. In M. Cooper and G.L. Hammer (ed.) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International. Wilingford, UK..
8. Fox, P.N., and A.A. Rosielle. 1982. Reducing the environmental main effects on pattern analysis of plant breeding environments. Euphytica 31:645-656.
9. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453-467.
10. Gauch, H.G. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705-715.
11. Gauch, H.G., and R.W. Zobel. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. p. 1-40. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch (ed.) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
12. Gauch, H.G., and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37:311-326.
13. Kempton, R.A. 1984. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 103:123-135.
14. Kroonenberg, P.M. 1995. Introduction to biplots for GxE tables. Department of Mathematics, Research Report 51. Univ. of Queensland, Australia.
15. McLaren, C.G. 1996. Methods of data standardization used in pattern analysis and AMMI models for the analysis of international multi-environment variety trials. p. 225-242. In M. Cooper and G.L. Hammer (ed.) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Wilingford, UK.
16. Piepho, H.P. 1994. Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for regional yield trials: A comparison to additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 647-654.
17. Yan, W., and L.A. Hunt. 1998. Genotype by environment interaction and crop yield. Plant Breed. Rev. 16:135-178.
18. Zobel, R.W.; M.J. Wright, and H.G. Gauch. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:388-393.