The intersection of communication and social psychology: Points of contact and points of difference

Journal of Communication

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 749-766

  Hornsey, Matthew J ^a   Gallois, Cindy ^a   Duck, Julie M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH WORK;

EID: 58149199739     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00412.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Argyle, M., Furnham, A., & Graham, J. A. (1981). Social situations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
2. Asch, S. E. (1952). Effects of group pressures upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 393-401). New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
3. Bavelas, J. B. (2005). The two solitudes: Reconciling social psychology and language and social interaction. In K. L. Fitch & R. S. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 179-200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brosius, H. B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1990). The agenda-setting function of television news: Static and dynamic views. Communication Research, 17, 183-211.
5. Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cappella, J. N. (1991). Mutual adaptation and relativity of measurement. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 103-117). New York: Guilford.
7. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
8. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Clark, A. E., & Kashima, Y. (2007). Stereotypes help people connect with others in the community: A situated functional analysis of the stereotype consistency bias in communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1028-1039.
10. D'Allesio, D., & Allen, M. (2000). Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 50, 133-156.
11. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
12. Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. J., Heltman, K., & Brown, C. E. (1988). The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 233-242.
13. El-Alayli, A., Myers, C. J., Petersen, T. L., & Lystad, A. L. (2008). "I don't mean to sound arrogant but..." The effects of using disclaimers on person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 130-143.
14. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Giles, D. (2003). Media psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The next decade and beyond. Communication Yearbook, 10, 13-48.
17. Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (International and Intercultural Communication Annual) (pp. 8-58) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2002). The effects of status on subgroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 203-218.
20. Hornsey, M. J., Robson, E., Smith, J., Esposo, S., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). Sugaring the pill: Assessing rhetorical strategies designed to minimize defensive reactions to group criticism. Human Communication Research, 34, 70-98.
21. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
23. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862-879.
24. Kashima, Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 19-38.
25. Kellermann, K., & Cole, T. (1994). Classifying compliance gaining messages: Taxonomic disorder and strategic confusion. Communication Theory, 4, 3-60.
26. Lambert, W. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 91-109.
27. Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
28. McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic Press.
29. Milne, S., Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Prediction and intervention in health-related behaviour: A meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 106-143.
30. Mullen, B. (2004). Sticks and stones can break my bones but ethnophaulisms can alter the portrayal of immigrants to children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 250-260.
31. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). Spiral of silence: Public opinion-Our social skin (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Norton, M. I., Sommers, S. R., Apfelbaum, E. P., Pura, N., & Ariely, D. (2006). Color blindness and interracial interaction: Playing the political correctness game. Psychological Science, 17, 949-953.
33. Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64-91). London: Sage.
34. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
35. Robinson, W. E., & Giles, H. (Eds.). (2001). The new handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley.
36. Shrum, L. J. (1992). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 69-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. Boston: Ginn.
38. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few. London: Abacus.
39. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
40. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585.
41. Van Lange, P. A. M. (Ed.). (2006). Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Violanti, M. T. (1999). An analysis of HCR's theoretical and methodological evolution. Human Communication Research, 25, 514-530.
43. Von Hippel, W. (2007). Aging, executive functioning, and social control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 240-244.
44. Warner, R., Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2007). Why minority group members resent impostors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1-17.
45. Weatherall, A., Gallois, C., & Pittam, J. (2001). Language and social interaction: Taking stock and looking forward. Communication Yearbook, 24, 363-383.
46. Wood, W., Wong, F. Y., & Chachere, J. G. (1991). Effects of media violence on viewers' aggression in unconstrained social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 371-383.