An analysis of HCR's theoretical and methodological evolution

Human Communication Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 514-530

  Violanti, Michelle T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033148180     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00459.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Donohue, W. A., Diez, M. E., & Hamilton, M. (1984). Coding naturalistic negotiation interaction. Human Communication Research, 10, 403-426.
2. Funkhouser, E. T. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574.
3. Gallois, C. (1998). Editor's note. Human Communication Research, 24, 475-477.
4. Giles, H. (1995). Editor's note. Human Communication Research, 21, 451-453.
5. Lee, J., & Jablin, F. M. (1995). Maintenance communication in superior-subordinate work relationships. Human Communication Research, 22, 220-257.
6. Omer, H., & Dar, R. (1992). Changing trends in three decades of psychotherapy research: The flight from theory into pragmatics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 88-93.
7. Ongel, U., & Smith, P. B. (1994). Who we are and where are we going? JCCP approaches its 100th issue. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 25, 25-53.
8. Shepherd, G. J. (1985). Linking attitudes and behavioral criteria. Human Communication Research, 12, 275-284.
9. Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 125-146). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.