Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 58-64

  Ghazal, M ^a,b   Kern, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALEPPO   (Syrian Arab Republic)

Author keywords

Chewing simulator; Human enamel; Loading force; Nano filled composite resin teeth; Scanning electron microscope; Two body wear

Indexed keywords

NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MASTICATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; NANOCOMPOSITES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH WEAR; TOOTH, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 58149127675     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01904.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kim SK, Kim KN, Chang IT, Heo SJ. A study of the effects of chewing patterns on occlusal wear. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 28 : 1048 1055.
2. Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 87 : 451 459.
3. Ekfeldt A, Karlsson S. Changes of masticatory movement characteristics after prosthodontic rehabilitation of individuals with extensive tooth wear. Int J Prosthodont. 1996 9 : 539 546.
4. Bani D, Bani T, Bergamini M. Morphologic and biochemical changes of the masseter muscles induced by occlusal wear: studies in a rat model. J Dent Res. 1999 78 : 1735 1744.
5. Hu X, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of a dental composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 30 : 729 737.
6. Mehl C, Scheibner S, Ludwig K, Kern M. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator. Dent Mater. 2007 23 : 1382 1389.
7. Stober T, Lutz T, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater. 2006 22 : 243 249.
8. Suzuki S, Wood MB. Mutual wear evaluation of resin composites when opposing enamel and dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007 81 : 76 81.
9. Hu X, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 29 : 756 764.
10. Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators - results of a round robin test. Dent Mater. 2005 21 : 304 317.
11. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent. 2004 17 : 373 377.
12. Imai Y, Suzuki S, Fukushima S. Enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent. 2000 13 : 315 323.
13. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear. Dent Mater. 2006 22 : 702 711.
14. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater. 2006 22 : 712 734.
15. Abe Y, Sato Y, Taji T, Akagawa Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. An in vitro wear study of posterior denture tooth materials on human enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 28 : 407 412.
16. Turssi CP, Faraoni-Romano JJ, de Menezes M, Serra MC. Comparative study of the wear behavior of composites for posterior restorations. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 18 : 143 147.
17. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res. 1992 71 : 1525 1529.
18. Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, Kern M. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent Mater. 2008 24 : 502 507.
19. Ramp LC, Broome JC, Ramp MH. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units. Am J Dent. 2006 19 : 31 36.
20. Say EC, Civelek A, Nobecourt A, Ersoy M, Guleryuz C. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Oper Dent. 2003 28 : 628 634.
21. Schuh C, Kinast EJ, Mezzomo E, Kapczinski MP. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 93 : 245 252.
22. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 26 : 372 378.
23. Shimada A, Tanaka M, Yamashita R, Noguchi K, Torisu T, Yamabe Y et al. Automatic regulation of occlusal force because of hardness-change of the bite object. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 35 : 12 19.
24. Schindler HJ, Stengel E, Spiess WE. Feedback control during mastication of solid food textures - a clinical experimental study. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 80 : 330 336.
25. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Sodeyama A, Matsumoto M. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 5 : 63 68.
26. Yeh CK, Johnson DA, Dodds MW, Sakai S, Rugh JD, Hatch JP. Association of salivary flow rates with maximal bite force. J Dent Res. 2000 79 : 1560 1565.
27. Chadwick RG. Thermocycling - the effects upon the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of three composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1994 21 : 533 543.
28. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. How heat treatment and thermal cycling affect wear of composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994 125 : 1467 1472.
29. Yap AU, Wee KE, Teoh SH, Chew CL. Influence of thermal cycling on OCA wear of composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2001 26 : 349 356.
30. Nagarajan VS, Jahanmir S, Thompson VP. In vitro contact wear of dental composites. Dent Mater. 2004 20 : 63 71.
31. Nihei T, Dabanoglu A, Teranaka T, Kurata S, Ohashi K, Kondo Y et al. Three-body-wear resistance of the experimental composites containing filler treated with hydrophobic silane coupling agents. Dent Mater. 2008 24 : 760 764.
32. Ghazal M, Steiner M, Kern M. Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 21 : 166 168.
33. Sakar-Deliormanli A, Guden M. Microhardness and fracture toughness of dental materials by indentation method. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006 76 : 257 264.
34. Attin T, Koidl U, Buchalla W, Schaller HG, Kielbassa AM, Hellwig E. Correlation of microhardness and wear in differently eroded bovine dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1997 42 : 243 250.
35. Kaidonis JA, Richards LC, Townsend GC, Tansley GD. Wear of human enamel: a quantitative in vitro assessment. J Dent Res. 1998 77 : 1983 1990.
36. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1989 68 : 1752 1754.
37. Pesun IJ, Olson AK, Hodges JS, Anderson GC. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 84 : 353 359.
38. Ohlmann B, Rohstock K, Kugler J, Gilde H, Nat R, Dreyhaupt J et al. Influences on clinical wear of acrylic denture teeth: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 20 : 496 498.
39. Ferracane JL. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater. 2006 22 : 689 692.