Mutual wear evaluation of resin composites when opposing enamel and dentin

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 76-81

  Suzuki, Shiro ^a   Wood, M B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Composite; Dentin; Enamel; In vitro; Wear

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE MATERIALS; DENTAL MATERIALS; ENAMELS; RESINS;

DENTIN; IN VITRO;

WEAR OF MATERIALS;

BIOMATERIAL; RESIN; WATER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DENTIN; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTIN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING;

EID: 33947704635     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30639     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Occlusion, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1983.
2. Hudson JD, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74: 647-654.
3. Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:275-281.
4. Ratledge DK, Smith BG, Wilson RF. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:194-203.
5. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: Restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int 1994;25:199-207.
6. Hacker CH, Wagner WC, Razzoog ME. An in vitro investigation of the wear of enamel on porcelain and gold in saliva. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:14-17.
7. Delong R, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:42-48.
8. Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT Jr, Duncanson MG Jr. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:303-309.
9. al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Gilmour WH. Investigation of human enamel wear against four dental ceramics and gold. J Dent 1998;26:487-495.
10. Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Wear of enamel opposing low-fusing and conventional ceramic restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2001;10:8-15.
11. al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Smith GM. Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:476-481.
12. Kaidonis JA, Richards LC, Townsend GC, Tansley GD. Wear of human enamel: A quantitative in vitro assessment. J Dent Res 1998;77:1983-1990.
13. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:74-80.
14. Imai Y, Suzuki S, Fukushima S. In vitro enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent 2000;13:315-323.
15. Suzuki S, Osborne JW, Leinfelder KF. Pre-clinical screening for wear of posterior composite resins. J Esthet Dent 1996;8: 263-268.
16. Leinfelder KF, Suzuki S. In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1347-1353.
17. Palmer DS, Barco MT, Pelleu GB Jr, McKinney JE. Wear of human enamel against a commercial castable ceramic restorative material. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:192-195.
18. Ramp MH, Ramp LC, Suzuki S. Vertical height loss: An investigation of four restorative materials opposing enamel. J Prosthodont 1999;8:252-257.
19. Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999;78:713-719.
20. Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70: 221-225.
21. Krejci I, Lutz F, Zedler C. Effect of contact area size on enamel and composite wear. J Dent Res 1992;71:1413-1416.
22. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res 1992;71: 1525-1529.
23. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res 1994;73:1546-1553.
24. Shortall AC, Hu XQ, Marquis PM. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater 2002;18:246-254.
25. Eisenburger M, Addy M. Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro, Part I: Interaction effects. J Dent 2002;30: 341-347.
26. Eisenburger M, Addy M. Erosion and attrition of human enamel in vitro, Part II: Influence of time and loading. J Dent 2002;30:349-352.
27. Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2001. pp 236-259.
28. Leinfelder KF. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:743-748.
29. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:234-242.
30. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-colored alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25:459-473.
31. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations: Two-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:164-169.
32. Eames WB, Strain JD, Weitman RT, Williams AK. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam, and silicate restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89:1111-1117.
33. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Santos JFF, Wall JT. Five-year clinical evaluation of anterior and posterior restorations of composite resin. Oper Dent 1980;5:57-65.
34. Leinfelder KF. Evaluation of clinical wear of posterior composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. The Netherlands: Peter Szulc; 1985. pp 501-509.
35. Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:299-306.
36. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin. Quint Int 1993;24:885-890.
37. Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox CF. Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:74-80.
38. Young HL, Suzuki S. Wear of composite resin inlays and antagonistic enamel. Am J Dent 1999;12:47-50.
39. Sturdevant CM, Barton RE, Sockwell CL, Strickland WD. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, 2nd ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1985. p 292.
40. Zheng J, Zhou ZR, Zhang J, Li H, Yu Y. On the friction and wear behaviour of human tooth enamel and dentin. Wear 2003; 255:967-974.
41. Joiner A, Collins LZ, Cox TF, Pickles MJ, Weader E, Liscombe C, Holt JS. The measurement of enamel and dentine abrasion by tooth whitening products using an in situ model. Int Dent J 2005;55:194-196.
42. Pickles MJ, Joiner A, Weader E, Cooper YL, Cox TF. Abrasion of human enamel and dentine caused by toothpastes of differing abrasivity determined using an in situ wear model. Int Dent J 2005;55:188-193.
43. Philpotts CJ, Weader E, Joiner A. The measurement in vitro of enamel and dentine wear by toothpastes of different abrasivity. Int Dent J 2005;55:183-187.
44. Graf K, Johnson GH, Mehl A, Rammelsberg P. The influence of dental alloys on three-body wear of human enamel and dentin in an inlay-like situation. Oper Dent 2002;27:167-174.
45. Suzuki S. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam? J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:355-367.
46. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent 2004;17:373-377.
47. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res. 1989; 68:1752-1754.
48. Molnar S, McKee JK, Molnar IM, Przybeck TR. Tooth wear rates among contemporary Australian Aborigines. J Dent Res 1983;62:562-565.
49. Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y. In vitro wear of indirect resin composite restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:431-436.
50. Maas MC. Enamel structure and microwear: An experimental study of the response of enamel to shearing force. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991;85:31-49.
51. Meredith N, Sherriff M, Setchell DJ, Swanson SA. Measurement of the microhardness and Young's modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:539-545.
52. Davidson JA, Poggie RA, Mishra AK. Abrasive wear of ceramic, metal, and UHMWPE bearing surfaces from third-body bone. PMMA bone cement, and titanium debris. Biomed Mater Eng 1994;4:213-229.