A comparative theory test of democratic peace arguments, 1946-2000 *

Journal of Peace Research

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 17-37

  Lektzian, David ^a   Souva, Mark ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58049183495     PISSN: 00223433     EISSN: 14603578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022343308098402     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Beck, Nathaniel ; Jonathan Katz & Richard Tucker, 1998. 'Taking Time Seriously in Binary Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis', American Journal of Political Science 42 (4). 1260-1288.
2. Bennett, D. Scott, 2006. 'Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection', International Studies Quarterly 50 (2). 313-338.
3. Bennett, D. Scott & Alan C. Stam, 2000. 'EUGene: A Conceptual Manual', International Interactions 26 (2). 179-204.
4. Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce ; James Morrow, Randolph Siverson & Alastair Smith, 1999. 'An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace', American Political Science Review 93 (4). 791-807.
5. Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce ; Michael Koch & Randolph Siverson, 2004. 'Testing Competing Institutional Explanations of the Democratic Peace: The Case of Dispute Duration', Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (4). 255-267.
6. Cheibub, José Antonio & Jennifer Gandhi, 2004. 'Classifying Political Regimes: A Six-Fold Measure of Democracies and Dictatorships', paper presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 2-5 September.
7. Denzau, Arthur & Douglass North, 1994. 'Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions', Kyklos 47 (1). 3-31.
8. Dixon, William, 1994. 'Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict', American Political Science Review 88 (1). 14-32.
9. Doyle, Michael, 1986. 'Liberalism and World Politics', American Political Science Review 80 (4). 459-477.
10. Fearon, James D., 1994. 'Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes', American Political Science Review 88 (3). 577-592.
11. Fearon, James D., 1995. 'Rationalist Explanations for War', International Organization 49 (3). 379-414.
12. Fearon, James D., 1997. 'Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands Versus Sinking Costs', Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1). 68-90.
13. Gartzke, Erik, 1998. 'Kant We All Just Get Along? Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace', American Journal of Political Science 42 (1). 1-27.
14. Gartzke, Erik ; Quan L. i & Charles Boehmer, 2001. 'Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict', International Organization 55 (2). 391-438.
15. Geddes, Barbara, 1999. 'Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument', paper presented at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA, 2-5 September.
16. Ghosn, Faten ; Glenn Palmer & Stuart Bremer, 2004. 'The MID3 Data Set, 1993-2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description', Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2). 133-154.
17. Gibler, Douglas, 2004. 'Measuring Alliances: The Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816-2000', Journal of Peace Research 41 (2). 211-222.
18. Gleditsch, Kristian, 2002. 'Expanded Trade and GDP Data', Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5). 712-724..
19. Gleditsch, Kristian & Michael Ward, 1997. 'Double Take: A Re-examination of Democracy and Autocracy in Modern Polities', Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (3). 361-383.
20. Gleditsch, Nils Petter ; Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Erikson, Margareta Sollenberg & Håvard Strand, 2002. 'Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset', Journal of Peace Research 39 (5). 615-637.
21. Gowa, Joanne, 1989. 'Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and Free Trade', American Political Science Review 83 (4). 1245-1256.
22. Gowa, Joanne, 1999. Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Hermann, Margaret & Charles Kegley, 1995. 'Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology', International Studies Quarterly 39 (4). 511-533.
24. Hewitt, Joseph, 2003. 'Dyadic Processes and International Crises', Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (5). 669-692.
25. Huth, Paul & Todd L. Allee, 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Jones, Daniel M. ; Stuart Bremer & J. David Singer, 1996. 'Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns', Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2). 163-213.
27. Lemke, Doug & William Reed, 2001. 'War and Rivalry Among Great Powers', American Journal of Political Science 45 (2). 457-469.
28. Maoz, Zeev & Bruce Russett, 1993. 'Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986', American Political Science Review 87 (3). 624-638.
29. Marshall, Monty & Keith Jaggers, 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Char-acteristics and Transitions, 1800-1999 ( http://www.bsos. umd.edu/cidcm/polity/).
30. Mousseau, Michael, 2000. 'Market Prosperity, Democratic Consolidation, and Democratic Peace', Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (4). 472-507.
31. Nooruddin, Irfan, 2002. 'Modeling Selection Bias in Studies of Sanctions Efficacy', International Interactions 28 (1). 57-74.
32. Oneal, John & Bruce Russett, 1999. 'Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict', Journal of Peace Research 36 (4). 423-442.
33. Peceny, Mark & Christopher Butler, 2004. 'The Conflict Behavior of Authoritarian Regimes', International Politics 41 (4). 565-581.
34. Peceny, Mark ; Caroline Beer & Shannon Sanchez-Terry, 2002. 'Dictatorial Peace?', American Political Science Review 96 (1). 15-26.
35. Pevehouse, Jon & Bruce Russett, 2006. 'Democratic International Governmental Organizations Promote Peace', International Organization 60 (Fall): 969-1000.
36. Prins, Brandon, 2003. 'Institutional Instability and the Credibility of Audience Costs: Examining the Impact of Political Participation on Interstate Crisis Bargaining', Journal of Peace Research 40 (1). 67-84.
37. Przeworski, Adam R. ; Michael Alvarez, Jose Cheibub & Fernando Limongi, 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Ray, James Lee, 2003. 'Explaining Interstate Conflict and War: What Should Be Controlled For?', Conflict Management and Peace Science 20 (2). 1-32.
39. Reed, William, 2000. 'A Unified Statistical Model of Conflict Onset and Escalation', American Journal of Political Science 44 (1). 84-93.
40. Reiter, Dan, 2003. 'Exploring the Bargaining Model of War', Perspectives on Politics 1 (1). 27-44.
41. Schultz, Kenneth A., 1999. 'Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War', International Organization 53 (2). 233-266.
42. Senese, Paul D., 1997. 'Between Dispute and War: The Effect of Joint Democracy on Interstate Conflict Escalation', Journal of Politics 59 (1). 1-27.
43. Singer, J. David ; Stuart Bremer & John Stuckey, 1972. 'Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965', in Bruce Russett, ed., Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage ( 19-48 ).
44. Slantchev, Branislav, 2006. 'Politicians, the Media, and Domestic Audience Costs', International Studies Quarterly 50 (2). 445-477.
45. Smith, Alastair, 1998. 'International Crises and Domestic Politics', American Political Science Review 92 (3). 623-638.
46. Souva, Mark, 2004. 'Institutional Similarity and Interstate Conflict', International Interactions 30 (3). 263-280.
47. Voeten, Erik, 2000. 'Clashes in the Assembly', International Organization 54 (2). 185-215.
48. Werner, Suzanne, 2000. 'The Effects of Political Similarity on the Onset of Militarized Disputes, 1816-1985', Political Research Quarterly 53 (2). 343-374.
49. Werner, Suzanne & Douglas Lemke, 1997. 'Opposites Do Not Attract: The Impact of Domestic Institutions, Power, and Prior Commitments on Alignment Choices', International Studies Quarterly 41 (3). 529-546.