The MID3 data set, 1993-2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description

Conflict Management and Peace Science

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 133-154

  Ghosn, Faten ^a   Palmer, Glenn ^a   Bremer, Stuart A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict; Data set; MID; Militarized interstate dispute

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344700218     PISSN: 07388942     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07388940490463861     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Bolks, S. M., and R. J Stoll. 2003. Examining conflict escalation within the civilization context. Conflict Management and Peace Science 20(2): 85-110.
2. Diehl, P. F., B. Pollins, G. Palmer, P. Hensel, D. Gibler, P. Regan, R. Stoll, J. L. Ray, D. Geller, C. Gochman, and S. Bremer. 1999. Collaborative research on updating the militarized dispute data set. Proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.
3. Enterline, A. 1998. Regime changes, neighborhoods, and interstate conflict, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(6): 804-829.
4. Gochman, C. S., and Z. Maoz. 1984. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, patterns, and insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28(4): 585-615.
5. Henderson, E. A. 1997. Culture or contiguity: Ethnic conflict, the similarity of states, and the onset of war, 1820-1989. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(5): 649-668.
6. Hensel, P. R. 1996. Charting a course to conflict: Territorial issues and interstate conflict, 1816-1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15(1): 43-73.
7. Huntington, S. P. 1993. The clash of civilization. Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22-49.
8. Jones, D., S. Bremer, and J. D. Singer. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15(2): 163-213.
9. Mansfield, E. D., and J. Snyder. 1995. Democratization and the danger of war. International Security 20(1): 5-38.
10. Palmer, G., T. R. London, and P. M. Regan. 2004. What's stopping you? The sources of political constraints on international conflict behavior in parliamentary democracies. International Interactions 30(1): 1-24.
11. Russett, B. M., J. R. Oneal, and M. Cox. 2000. Clash of civilizations, or realism and liberalism dẽjà vu? Some evidence. Journal of Peace Research 37(5): 583-608.
12. Senese, P. 1996. Geographical proximity and issue salience: Their effects on the escalation of militarized interstate conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15: 133-161.
13. Senese, P., and J. Vasquez. 2003. A unified explanation of territorial conflict: Testing the impact of sampling bias, 1919-1992. International Studies Quarterly 47(2): 275-298.
14. Vasquez, J. 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Vasquez, J., and M. T. Henehan. 2001. Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816-1992. Journal of Peace Research 38(2): 123-138.
16. Ward, M. D., and K. S. Gleditsch. 1998. Democratizing for peace. American Political Science Review 92(1): 51-61.