Introducing decisive development orientations into transport modelling

Transport

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 330-334

  Tanczos, Katalin ^a   Torok, Arpad ^a  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Dynamic modelling; Regulated urban process; Urban modelling; Urban transportation

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC MODELS; LAND USE; URBAN PLANNING;

DEVELOPMENT ORIENTATIONS; ECONOMICAL ASPECTS; TEMPORAL PROPERTY; TRANSPORT MODELLING; URBAN MODELLING; URBAN PROCESS;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 58049131415     PISSN: 16484142     EISSN: 16483480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.330-334     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anas, A.; Kim, I. 1996. General equilibrium models of polycentric urban land use with endogenous congestion and job agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics 40(2): 232-256.
2. Anas, A.; Xu, R. 1999. Congestion, land use, and job dispersion: a general equilibrium model, Journal of Urban Economics 45(3): 451-473.
3. Azemsha, S. 2006. Methods for optimization of rotational latency of the inverse loading of trucks on international routes, Transport 21(3): 182-188.
4. Basu, D.; Maitra, B. 2007. Valuing attributes of enhanced traffic information: an experience in Kolkata, Transport 22(3): 164-173.
5. Cascetta, E.; Papola, A. 1. 2008. A trip distribution model involving spatial and dominance attributes, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 23(2): 116-124.
6. Casey, H. J. 1955. Applications to traffic engineering of the law of retail gravitation, Traffic Quarterly 9(1): 23-25.
7. Friedrich, M.; HofsäB, I.; Nökel, K.; Vortisch, P. 2000. A Dynamic Traffic Assignment Method for Planning and Telematic Applications, in Proceedings of Seminar K, European Transport Conference, Cambridge, 29-40. Available from Internet: < http://www.isv.uni-stuttgart.de/vuv/ publication/PDF/200009-Fr-DTA-ETC.pdf>.
8. Koren, C; Prileszky, I.; Horváth, B.; Toth-Szabó, Z. 2006. Köz-lekedés tervezés [Transport Planning]. Széchenyi István University, 1-183.
9. Mills, E. S. 1974. Mathematical models for urban planning, in Urban and Social Economics in Market and Planned Economies, Eds. Brown, A. A.; Licari, J. A; Neuberger, E. (Praeger,New York), 113-129.
10. Peter, T. 2007. Nagymeretu′ nemlineáris közúti közlekedési hálózatok speciális analizise [Modeling of extended nonlinear transportation networks], Transportation Science Review 9: 322-331.
11. TAG 3.11.2. 2006. Road Traffic and Public Transport Assignment Modelling. TAG (Transport Analysis Guidance). Integrated Transport Economics Appraisal, Department for Transport, Great Minster House, London. Available from Internet: < http://www.webtag.org.uk/webdocuments/3-Expert/1 l-Specifications/pdf/3.11.2.pdf >.
12. Tanczos, K.; Torok, A. 2007. Linear optimization model of urban areas' operating efficiency, Transport 22(3): 225-228.
13. Uspalytė-Vitkünienė, R.; Burinskienė, M.; Grigonis, V. 2006. Calibration of Vilnius public transport model, Transport 21(3): 201-206.
14. Ziari, H.; Behbahani, H.; Khabiri, M. M. 2006. Providing a decreasing congestion probability model for urban streets network, Transport 21(3): 207-212.
15. Ziari, H.; Keymanesh, M. R.; Khabiri, M. M. 2007. Locating stations of public transportation vehicles for improving transit accessibility, Transport 22(2): 99-104.