Valuing attributes of enhanced traffic information: An experience in Kolkata

Transport

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 164-173

  Basu, Debasis ^a   Maitra, Bhargab ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Constrained T distribution; Instantaneous traffic information; Mixed logit; Multinomial logit; Preference heterogeneity; Stated choice; Value of travel time and travel time variation

Indexed keywords

GROUND VEHICLES; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION DISPLAYING; INSTANTANEOUS TRAFFIC INFORMATIONS; MIXED LOGITS; MULTINOMIAL LOGITS; PREFERENCE HETEROGENEITY; STATED CHOICES; TRAFFIC INFORMATIONS; TRAVEL TIME VARIATIONS; VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 36048962049     PISSN: 16484142     EISSN: 16483480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16484142.2007.9638120     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Durand-Raucher, Y.; YIM, Y.; YGNACE, J. Traffic information and driver behaviour in Paris region. In Proc., Pacific Rim Transtech Conference, Seatle, ASCE, 1993, Vol 1, p. 167-169.
2. BENSON, B. G. Motorists attitudes about content of variable-message signs. Transportation Research Record, 1550, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 1996, p. 48-57.
3. RAMSAY, E. D.; CATCHPOLE, J. E.; LUK, J. Y. K. Evaluation of VicRoads’ drive time system. Res. Rep. ARR 305, ARRB Transport Research, Vermont South, Victory, Australia, 1997.
4. WARDMAN, M.; BONSALL, P. W.; SHIRES, J. D. Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation. Transportation Research Part C, 1997, Vol 5, No 6, p. 389-405.
5. BAOFENG, S.; ZHICAI, J.; LELEUR, S.; Wen-Jing, Wu. Research reviews of socio-economic impact evaluation for VMS project on freeway. In Proc., 8th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vienna, Austria, Spe 13-16, 2005, p. 1017-1021.
6. CATCHPOLE, J., HANCOCK, A., CAIRNEY, P. Driver comprehension of formats for presenting traffic information on dynamic signs. Res. Rep. ARR 269, ARRB Transport Research, Vermont South, Victory, Australia, 1995.
7. LAI, K. H.; Wong, W. G. SP Approach toward driver comprehension of message formats on VMS. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, May-June, 2000, p. 221-227.
8. LOMAX, T.; SCHRANK, D.; TURNER, S.; Margiot-Ta, R. Selecting travel reliability measures. Texas Transportation Institute and Cambridge Systematics, Inc, 2003.
9. ADAMOWICZ, W. L.; LOUVIERE, J.; WILLIAMS, M. Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environment Economics and Management, 1994, Vol 26, p. 271-292.
10. BATES, J. Stated preference technique for the analysis of transportation behavior. In Proc., World Conference of Transportation Research, Hamburg, W. Germany, 1982, p. 252-265.
11. KROES, E. P.; SHELDON, R. J. Stated preference methods: an introduction. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1988, Vol 22, p. 11-25.
12. LOUVIERE, J. J. Conjoint analysis modeling of stated preferences: a review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1988, Vol 22(1), p. 93-119.
13. HENSHER, D. A. Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice. Transportation, 1994, Vol 21(2), p. 107-133.
14. Joseholguin-Veras, P. E. Revealed preference analysis of commercial vehicle choice process. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 2002, Vol 128 (4), p. 236-346.
15. PHANIKUMAR, C. V.; BASU, D.; MAITRA, B. Modeling generalized cost of travel for rural bus users: a case study. Journal of Public Transportation, 2004, Vol 7, No 2, p. 59-72.
16. HENSHER, D. A. Measurement of valuation of travel time savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Jan. 2001, Vol 35, Part I, p. 71-98.
17. HENSHER, D. A.; SULLIVAN, C. Willingness to pay for road curviness and road type. Transportation Research PartD, 2003, Vol 8, p. 139-155.
18. LOUVIERE, J. J.; HENSHER, D. A.; SWAIT, J. D. Stated choice methods. Analysis and applications. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
19. Jara-Diaz, S. R. Time and income in travel choice: towards a microeconomic activity based theoretical framework. In Theoretical Foundations of Travel Choice Modeling. T. Garling, T. Laitila and K. Westin (eds.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, Chapter 3, 1998, p. 51-74.
20. Jara-Diaz, S. R. Allocation and valuation of travel time savings. In D. A. Hensher and K. Button (eds.). Transport Modeling, Handbooks in Transport, Pergamon Press, Oxford, Chapter 19 2000.
21. THURSTONE, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 1927, 4, p. 273-286.
22. MCFADDEN, D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (ed.). Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press, 1974, p. 105-142.
23. Ben-Akiva, M.; Lerman, S. R. Discrete choice analysis: theory and applications to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1985.
24. POLLAK, R. A.; WALES, T. J. Demand specification and estimation. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1992.
25. REVELT, D.; TRAIN, K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance ffficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998, 80, p. 647-657.
26. rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2001.
27. TRAIN, K. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
28. HENSHER, D. A.; ROSE, J. M.; GREENE, W. H. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
29. TRAIN, K. Halton sequences for mixed logits. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley, 1999.
30. BHAT, C. R. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research PartB 35, 2001, p. 677-693.
31. HENSHER, D. A.; GREENE, W. H. The mixed logit model: the state of practice and warnings for the unwary. Working Paper, School of Business, University of Sidney, 2001.
32. GREEN, P. E.; KRIEGER, A. M.; WIND, Y. J. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. INTERFACES 31:3, Part 2 of 2, May-June, 2001, p. S56-S73.
33. LIMDEP 8.0. User's guide for LIMDEP 8.0, Econometrics Software, Inc., 2005.
34. PHANIKUMAR, C. V.; MAITRA, B. Willingness-to-pay and preference heterogeneity for rural bus attributes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2007, Vol 133, No 1, ASCE, p. 62-69.
35. Mumbai metro planning group mumbai metro study: travel demand forecasting model. Working Paper No 4, Mumbai, 1997.
36. LIU, H. X.; RECKER, W.; CHEN, A. Uncovering the contribution of travel time reliability to dynamic route choice using real-time loop data. Transportation Research Part A 38, 2004, p. 435-453.
37. TRAIN, K. Recreation demand models with taste differences over People. Land Economics, 1998, Vol 74, No 2, p. 230-239.
38. Alpizar, F.; Carlsson, F. Policy implications and analysis of the determinants of travel mode choice: an application of choice experiments to metropolitan Costa Rica. Working Paper in Economics 56, Department of Economics, Goteborg University, 2001.
39. AMADOR F. J.; GONZALEZ R. M.; ORTUZAR J. de D. Preference heterogeneity and willingness-to-pay for travel time savings. Transportation, 2005, 36, 6, p. 627-647