A trip distribution model involving spatial and dominance attributes

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 116-124

  Cascetta, Ennio ^a   Papola, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RANDOM VARIABLES; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

DESTINATION CHOICE MODELS; DOMINANCE VARIABLES; ORIGIN-DESTINATION GENERALIZED COST; SPATIAL VARIABLES; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING;

TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

COSTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RANDOM VARIABLES; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

DOMINANCE; LOCATION DECISION; MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; LAZIO; ROMA [LAZIO]; ROME; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 38049148593     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: 14678667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00528.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allenby, G. & Ginter, J. (1995), The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 67-80.
2. Almeida, M. W. & Goncalves, M. B. (2001), A methodology to incorporate behavioural aspects in trip-distribution models with an application to estimate student flow, Environment and Planning A, 33, 1125-38.
3. Andrews, R. & Srinivasan, T. C. (1995), Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data, Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 30-41.
4. Basar, G. & Bhat, C. (2004), A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: An application to the San Francisco Bay Area, Transportation Research, 38B, 889-904.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., Gunn, G. H. & Silman, L. (1985), Disaggregate trip distribution models, paper presented at the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo.
6. Ben Akiva, M. & Lerman, S. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Ben-Akiva, M. & Boccarà, B. (1995), Discrete choice models with latent choice sets, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 9-24.
8. Ben-Akiva, M. & Bierlaire, M. (1999), Discrete choice models and their applications to short-term travel decisions, Handbook of Transportation Science, 26, 5-34.
9. Block, H. D. & Marschak, J. (1960), Random orderings and stochastic theories of response, in I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. Madow, and H. Mann (eds.), Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA pp. 97-132.
10. Cantillo, V. & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2004), A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception, Transportation Research, 39B, 641-57.
11. Cantillo, V., Heydecker, B. & Ortuzar, J. D. (2006), A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values, Transportation Research B, 40, 807-25.
12. Cascetta, E., Nuzzolo, A., Russo, F. & Vitetta, A. (1996), A new route choice logit model overcoming IIA problems: Specification and some calibration results for interurban networks, in J. B. Lesort (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Pergamon, Lyon.
13. Cascetta, E. & Papola, A. (2001), Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand, Transportation Research, C 9/4, 249-63.
14. Cascetta, E. (2001), Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods, Kluwer, Boston.
15. Cascetta, E., Pagliara, F. & Papola, A. (2007), Alternative approaches to trip distribution modelling-a retrospective review and suggestions for combining different approaches, Papers in Regional Science, 86/4, 597-620.
16. Casey, H. J. (1955), Applications to traffic engineering of the law of retail gravitation, Traffic Quarterly, 9, 23-35.
17. Chankong, V. & Haimes, Y. Y. (1983), Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology, Elsevier-North-Holland, New York.
18. Chiang, J., Siddhartha, C. & Chakravarthi, N. (1999), Markov chain Monte Carlo and model of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity, Journal of Econometrics, 89, 223-48.
19. Cochrane, R. A. (1975), A possible economic basis for the gravity model, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1, 34-39.
20. Daly, A. & Zachary, S. (1976), Improved multiple choice models, in Proceedings of the 4th PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, PTRC, London.
21. Elrod, T., Johnson, R. & White, J. (2005), A New Integrated model of noncompensatory and compensatory decision strategies, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 1-19.
22. Fotheringham, A. S. (1983), A new set of spatial interaction models: The theory of competing destination, Environment and Planning A, 15, 15-36.
23. Fotheringham, A. S. (1985), Spatial competition and agglomeration in urban modelling, Environment and Planning A, 17, 213-30.
24. Fotheringham, A. S. (1986), Modelling hierarchical destination choice, Environment and Planning A, 18, 401-18.
25. Fotheringham, A. S. (1988), Consumer store choice and choice set definition, Marketing Science, 7, 299-310.
26. Fotheringham, A. S. (1991), Statistical modeling of spatial choice: An overview, in A. Ghosh and C. Ingene (eds.), Spatial Analysis in Marketing: Theory, Methods, and Applications, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 95-118.
27. Gaudry, M. & Dagenais, M. (1979), The dogit model, Transportation Research B, 13, 105-11.
28. Gilbride, T. & Allemby, G. (2004), A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive and compensatory screening rules, Marketing Science, 23, 391-406.
29. Guldmann, J. M. (1999), Competing destinations and intervening opportunities interaction models of intercity telecommunications flows, Papers in Regional Science, 78, 179-94.
30. Haimes, Y. Y. & Chankong, V. (1985), Decision Making with Multiple Objectives, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
31. Horowitz, J. L. & Louviere, J. J. (1995), What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12 (1), 39-54.
32. Huff, D. (1964), Defining and estimating a trading area, Journal of Marketing, 28, 34-38.
33. Improta, A. A. & Papola, A. (2000), Un modello di distribuzione con simulazione implicita dell'insieme di scelta, in Proceedings of the II conference "Metodi e tecnologie dell'ingegneria dei trasporti,"Franco Angeli.
34. Koppelman, F. & Sethi, V. (2000), Closed form discrete-choice models, in D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button (eds.), Handbook of Transport Modelling, Volume 1, of Handbook in Transport, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 211-22.
35. Lerman, S. R. (1983), Random utility models of spatial choice, in B. G. Hutchinson, P. Nijkamp, and M. Batty (eds.), Optimization and Discrete Choice in Urban Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
36. Louviere, J., Hensher, D. & Swait, J. (2000), Stated Choice Methods-Analysis and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Manski, C. (1977), The structure of random utility models, Theory and Decision, 8, 229-54.
38. McFadden, D. (1981), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Meyer, R. (1980), A behavioral theory of choice set formation under informational constraints, Transportation Research Record, 750, 6-12.
40. Morikawa, T. (1995), A hybrid probabilistic choice set model with compensatory and non-compensatory choice rules, in Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Transport Research, vol. 1. Travel Behaviour, Pergamon, Oxford.
41. Nuzzolo, A. & Coppola, P. (2000), Un modello di domanda e di interazione territoriale per la cittàdi Roma, Internal report of STA society.
42. Oppermann, M. (1997), Predicting destination choice-a discussion of destination loyalty, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 5, 51-64.
43. Ortuzar, J. de D. & Willumsen, L. G. (2001), Modelling Transport, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
44. Richards, M. & Ben-Akiva, M. (1975), A Disaggregate Travel Demand Model, D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA.
45. Roberts, J. & Lattin, J. (1991), Developing and testing of a model of consideration set composition, Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 429-40.
46. Roy, J. R. (1993), Comment on the development of a new gravity-opportunity model for trip distribution, Environment and Planning A, 25, 1689-91.
47. Roy, J. R. (2004), Spatial Interaction Modelling: A Regional Science Perspective, Springer, Berlin.
48. Roy, J. R. & Thill, J. C. (2004), Spatial interaction modelling, Papers in Regional Science, 83, 339-61.
49. Ruiter, E. (1967), Towards a better understanding of the intervening opportunities model, Transportation Research, 1, 47-56.
50. Schneider, M. (1959), Gravity models and trip distribution theory, Papers of Regional Science Association, 5, 47-56.
51. Stouffer, S. A. (1960), Intervening opportunities and competing migrants, Journal of Regional Science, 2, 1-26.
52. Swait, J. (1984), Probabilistic choice set formation in transportation demand models, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
53. Swait, J. & Ben-Akiva, M. (1987a), Incorporating Random Constraints in Discrete Choice Models of Choice Set Generation, Transportation Research B, 21, 91-102.
54. Swait, J. & Ben-Akiva, M. (1987b), Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: Mode choice in São Paulo, Brazil, Transportation Research B, 21, 103-115. PLC.
55. Swait, J. (2001a), Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models, Transportation Research Part B, 35, 643-66.
56. Swait, J. (2001b), A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs, Transportation Research B, 35, 903-28.
57. Thill, J. C. (1992), Choice set formation for destination choice modeling, Progress in Human Geography, 16, 361-82.
58. Train, K. (1998), Recreational demand models with taste differences over people, Land Economics, 74(2), 230-39.
59. Train, K. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
60. Tversky, A. (1972), Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice, Psychological Review, 79, 281-99.
61. Williams, H. & Ortuzar, J. (1982), Behavioral theories of dispersion and the misspecification of travel demand models, Transportation Research B, 16, 167-219.
62. Wills, M. J. (1986), A flexible gravity-opportunity model for trip distribution, Transportation Research B, 20, 89-111.
63. Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A. & Kusakabe, T. (2005), A new discrete choice model with endogenous generation of choice set based on the principle of relative utility maximization, in Proceeding of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.