The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the department of defense

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 125-143

  Rubin, Ellen V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849158241     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum035     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albrecht, S., and A. Travaglione. 2003. Trust in public sector senior management. International Journal of Human Resources Management 14:76-92.
2. Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M. 1987. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organization behavior. Social Justice Research 1:117-98.
3. Alvarez, R., and J. Brehm, 1995. American ambivalence toward abortion policy: A heteroskedastic probit method for assessing conflicting values. American Journal of Political Science 39:1055-82.
4. Ball, G., Trevino, L. K., and Sims, H. 1993. Justice and organizational punishment: Attitudinal outcomes of disciplinary events. Social Justice Research 6:39-67.
5. Blader, S., and T. Tyler. 2003. What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29:747-58.
6. Board of Regents v. Roth. 1972. 408 U.S. 564.
7. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., and Fairchild, G. 2001. When do elements of procedural fairness make a difference? A classification of moderating influences. In Advances in organizational justice, ed. J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano, 179-212. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
8. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill. 1985. 470 U.S. 469.
9. Cohen-Charash, Y., and Spector, P. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82:278-321.
10. Colquitt, J. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:386-400.
11. Colquitt, J., D. Conlon, M. Wesson, C. Porter, and K. Ng. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:425-45.
12. Cooper, P. 2000. Public law and public administration. 3rd ed. Itasca, IL: FE Peacock Publishers.
13. De Cremer, D., and Tyler, T. R. 2005. Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural fairness, self, and cooperation. In Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 37, ed. M. Zanna, 151-218. New York: Academic Press.
14. Dirks, K., and D. Ferrin. 2002. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology 87:611-28.
15. Folger, Robert, and Cropanzano, Russell. 1998. Organizational justice and human resource management. London: Sage.
16. Franklin, A., and J. Pagan. 2006. Organization culture as an explanation for employee discipline practices. Review of Public Personnel Administration 26 (1): 52-73.
17. Hays, S., and J. Sowa. 2006. A broader look at the " accountability" movement: Some grim realities in state civil service systems. Review of Public Personnel Administration 26 (2): 102-17.
18. Hellman, C. 1997. Job satisfaction and intent to leave. Journal of Social Psychology 137:677-89.
19. Hom, P., F. Caranikas-Walker, G. Prussia, and R. Griffeth. 1992. A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology 77:890-909.
20. Kaufman, H. 1977. Red tape, its origins, uses, and abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
21. Kellough, J. E., and L. Nigra. 2006. Civil service reform in the states: Politics and public personnel policy at the sub-national level. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
22. Korsgaard, M. A., and Roberson, L. 1995. Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management 21:657-69.
23. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., and Sapienza, H. 1995. Building commitment, attachment and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal 38:60-84.
24. Leventhal, G. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, ed. K. Gergen, M. Greenbers, and R. Willis, 27-55. New York: Plenum.
25. Lind, A. 2001. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Advances in organizational justice, ed. J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano, 56-88. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
26. Lind, E. Allen, and Tyler, Tom. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
27. Long, J. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Masterson, S., Lewis, K., Goldman, K., and Taylor, S. 2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal 48:738-48.
29. Mosher, F. 1968. Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
30. Nigro L., and J. E. Kellough. 2000. Civil service reform in Georgia: Going to the edge? Review of Public Personnel Administration 20 (3): 41-54.
31. Rainey, H. G. 1997. The "how much process is due" debate: Legal and managerial perspectives. In Handbook of public law and administration, ed. P. Cooper and C. Newland, 237-53. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
32. Selden, S. 2006. The impact of discipline on the use and rapidity of dismissal in state governments. Review of Public Personnel Administration 26 (4): 335-54.
33. Simons, T., and Q. Roberson. 2003. Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 432-3.
34. Sitkin, S., and R. Bies, eds. 1994. The legalization of organizations: A multi-theoretical perspective. The legalistic organization, 19-52. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Skarlicki, D., and Latham, G. 1996. Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of the organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology 81:161-9.
36. Skitka, L. J. 2003. Of different minds: An accessibility identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7:286-97.
37. Tekleab, A., K. Bartol, and W. Liu. 2005. Is it pay levels or pay raises that matter to fairness and turnover? Journal of Organizational Behavior 26:899-921.
38. Tett, R., and J. Meyer. 1993. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology 46:259-88.
39. Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. L. 2003. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7:349-61.
40. US Government Accountability Office. 1995. Civil service reform: Changing times demand new approaches. GAO/T-GGD-96-31. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office.
41. -. 2002. Human capital: Effective use of flexibilities can assist agencies in managing their workforces. GAO-03-2. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office.
42. st century: Results of the merit principles survey 2000. Washington, DC: US Merit Systems Protection Board.
43. US Office of Personnel Management. 2003. What do federal employees say? Results from the 2002 Federal Human Capital Survey. Washington, DC: US Office of Personnel Management.
44. Waldo, D. 1948. The administrative state: A study of the political theory of public administration. New York: Ronald.
45. Weber, M. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.