Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa

Taxon

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 803-804

  Brummitt, Richard K ^a  

^a ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TAXONOMY;

EID: 0345581245     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3647353     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. Brummitt, R. K. 1996. In defense of paraphyletic taxa. Pp. 371-384 in: van der Maesen, L. J. G., van der Burgt, X. M. & van Medenbach van Rooy, J. M. (eds.), The Biodiversity of African Plants. Proc. XIVth AETFAT Congress, 22-27 August 1994, Wageningen. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
2. Brummitt, R. K. 2002. How to chop up a tree. Taxon 51: 31-41.
3. Brummitt, R. K. & Sosef, M. S. M. 1998. Paraphyletic taxa are inherent in Linnaean classification - a reply to Freudenstein. Taxon 47: 411-412.
4. Cullen, J. & Walters, S. M. In press. How many families do we need? In: Leadley, A. A. & Jury, S. L. (eds.), Taxonomy and Plant Conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
5. Diggs, G. M. & Lipscomb, B. L. 2002. What is the writer of a Flora to do? Evolutionary taxonomy or phylogenetic systematics? Sida 20: 647-674.
6. Funk, V. A. 2001. Invited comments. The Plant Press 4(2): 11-12.
7. Nelson, G., Murphy, D. J. & Ladiges, P. Y. 2003. Brummitt on paraphyly: a response. Taxon 52: 295-298.
8. Stuessy, T. F. 1997. Classification: more than just branching patterns of evolution. Aliso 15: 113-124.