Numerical study of hemodynamics comparison between small and large femoral bypass grafts

Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1067-1078

  Qiao, Aike ^a,b   Liu, Youjun ^b  

^a SHANTOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Anastomosis; Biomechanics; Blood flow; Configuration; Restenosis

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLOW PATTERNS; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); HEMODYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MECHANICS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SCAFFOLDS; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

ANASTOMOSIS; BLOOD FLOW; BYPASS GRAFTS; CONFIGURATION; FEMORAL ARTERIES; FEMORAL BYPASSES; FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS; GEOMETRY FACTORS; INTIMAL HYPERPLASIAS; LONGITUDINAL VELOCITIES; NUMERICAL STUDIES; PULSATILE BLOOD FLOWS; RESTENOSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; WALL SHEAR STRESS GRADIENTS; WALL SHEAR STRESSES;

GRAFTS;

EID: 57749199474     PISSN: 10698299     EISSN: 10990887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1012     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Pedrini L, Pisano E, Donato DPM, Balleste A, Magnoni F. Late occlusion of aortofemoral bypass graft: surgical treatment. Cardiovascular Surgery 1994; 2:763-766.
2. Loth F, Jones SA, Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Nassar RF, Glagov S, Bassiouny HS. Relative contribution of wall shear stress and injury in experimental intimal thickening at PTFE end-to-side arterial anastomoses. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2002; 124:44-51.
3. Bassiouny HS, White S, Glagov S, Choi E, Giddens DP, Zarins CK. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992; 15:708-717.
4. Glagov S. Intimal hyperplasia, vascular modeling and the restenosis problem. Circulation 1994; 89:2888-2891.
5. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Atheroma and arterial wall shear: observation, correlation, and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proceedings of Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 1971; 177:109-159.
6. White CR, Haidekker M, Bao X, Frangos JA. Temporal gradients in shear, but not spatial gradients, stimulate endothelial cell proliferation. Circulation 2001; 103:2508-2513.
7. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation: positive correlation between plaque location and low and oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985; 5:293-302.
8. Honda HM, Hsiai T, Wortham CM, Chen M, Lin H, Navab M, Demer LL. A complex flow pattern of low shear stress and flow reversal promotes monocyte binding to endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2001; 158:385-390.
9. Ojha M. Wall shear stress temporal gradient and anastomotic intimal hyperplasia. Circulation Research 1994; 74:1227-1231.
10. Staalsen NH, Ulrich M, Winther J, Pedersen EM, How T, Nygaard H. The anastomosis angle does change the flow fields at vascular end-to-side anastomoses in vivo. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1995; 21:460-471.
11. Liu SQ. Focal expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor and smooth muscle cell proliferation in the neointima of experimental vein grafts: relation to eddy blood flow. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 1999; 19:2630-2639.
12. Salam TA, Lumdsden AB, Suggs WD, Ku DN. Low shear stress promotes intimal hyperplasia thickening. Journal of Vascular Investigation 1996; 2:12-22.
13. Nagel T, Resnick N, Dewey Jr CF, Gimbrone Jr MA. Vascular endothelial cells respond to spatial gradients in fluid shear stress by enhanced activation of transcription factors. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 1999; 19:1825-1834.
14. Tardy Y, Resnick N, Nagel T, Gimbrone Jr MA, Dewey Jr CF. Shear stress gradients remodel endothelial monolayers in vitro via a cell proliferation-migration-loss cycle. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 1997; 17:3102-3106.
15. Fei DY, Thomas JD, Rittgers SE. The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: a numerical model study. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1994; 116:331-336.
16. Inzoli F, Migliavacca F, Pennati G. Numerical analysis of steady flow in aorto-coronary bypass 3-D model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1996; 118:172-179.
17. Cole JS, Watterson JK, O'Reilly MJG. Numerical investigation of the haemodynamics at a patched arterial bypass anastomosis. Medical Engineering and Physics 2002; 24:393-401.
18. Lei M, Archie JP, Kleinstreuer C. Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997; 25:637-646.
19. Hughes PE, How TV. Effects of geometry and flow division on flow structures in models of the distal end-to-side anastomosis. Journal of Biomechanics 1996; 29:866-872.
20. Qiao A, Zeng Y, Xu X. Numerical simulations of stenosed femoral artery with symmetric 2-way bypass graft. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering 2004; 14:167-174.
21. Langille BL, O'Donnell F. Reductions in arterial diameter produced by chronic decreases in blood flow are endothelium-dependent. Science 1986; 231:405-407.
22. Zarins CK, Zatina MA, Giddens DP, Ku DN, Glagov S. Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diameter in experimental atherogenesis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1987; 5:413-420.
23. Steinman DA, Vinh B, Eithier CR, Ojha M, Cobbold RSC, Johnston KW. A numerical simulation of flow in a two-dimensional end-to-side anastomosis model. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1993; 115:112-118.
24. Qiao A, Guo X, Wu S, Zeng Y, Xu X. Numerical study of nonlinear pulsatile flow in S-shaped curved arteries. Medical Engineering and Physics 2004; 26:545-552.
25. Qiao A, Liu Y, Li S, Zhao H. Numerical simulation of physiological blood flow in 2-way coronary artery bypass grafts. Journal of Biological Physics 2005; 31:161-182.
26. Qiao A, Liu Y, Guo Z. Wall shear stresses in small and large 2-way bypass grafts. Medical Engineering and Physics 2006; 28:251-258.
27. Qiao A, Liu Y. Influence of graft-host diameter ratio on the hemodynamics of CABG. Bio-medical Materials and Engineering 2006; 16:189-201.
28. Leuprecht A, Perktold K, Prosi M, Berk T, Trubel W, Schima H. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses of bypass grafts. Journal of Biomechanics 2002; 35:225-236.
29. Moore Jr JE, Burki E, Suciu A, Zhao S, Burnier M, Brunner HR, Meister JJ. A device for subjecting vascular endothelial cells to both fluid shear stress and circumferential cyclic stretch. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1994; 22:416-422.
30. Yoshizumi M, Kurihara H, Sugiyama T, Takaku F, Yanagisawa M, Masaki T, Yazaki Y. Hemodynamic shear stress stimulates endothelin production by cultured endothelial cells. Biochemistry Biophysics Research Communication 1989; 161:859-864.
31. Bertolotti C, Deplano V, Fuseri J, Dupouy P. Numerical and experimental models of post-operative realistic flows in stenosed coronary bypasses. Journal of Biomechanics 2001; 34:1049-1064.