Numerical analysis of steady flow in aorto-coronary bypass 3-d model

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 172-179

  Inzoli, Fabio ^a   Migliavacca, Francesco ^a   Pennati, Giancarlo ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SHEAR STRESS;

AORTOCORONARY BYPASS; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; INTIMAL HYPERPLASIA;

HEMODYNAMICS;

ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DYNAMICS; END TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; GRAFT FAILURE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SHEAR STRESS;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; SAPHENOUS VEIN; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0030152228     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2795956     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bach, R. G., Kern, M. J., Donohue, T. J., Aguirre, F. V., and Caracciolo, E. A., 1993, “Comparison of Phasic Blood Flow Velocity Characteristics of Arterial and Venous Coronary Artery Bypass Conduits,” Circulation, Vol. 88, No. 5, Part II, pp. 133-140.
2. Berne, R. M, Levy, M. N., 1981, Cardiovascular Physiology, CV Mosby Co., London.
3. Caro, C. G., Fitzgerald, J. M., and Schroter, R. C., 1971, “Atheroma and Arterial Wall Shear Observations, Correlation and Proposal of a Shear Dependent Mass Transfer Mechanism for Atherogenesis,” Proc. R. Soc., Vol. 177, pp. 109-159.
4. Campbell, P. C., McGeachie, J. K., and Prendergast, F. J., 1981, “Vein Grafts for Arterial Repair: Their Success and Reasons for failure,” Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., Vol. 63, pp. 257-260.
5. Clark, R. E., Apostolous, S., and Kardos, J. L., 1976, “Mismatch of Mechanical Proprieties as a Cause of Arterial Prosthesis Thrombosis,” Surg. Forum, Vol. 27, pp. 208-210.
6. Crawshaw, H. M., Quist, W. C., Serrallach, E., Valeri, C. R., and Logerfo, F. W., 1980, “Flow Disturbance at the Distal End-to-Side Anastomosis,” Arch. Surg., Vol. 115, pp. 1280-1284.
7. Engelman, M. S., 1982, “FIDAP-A Fluid Dynamics Analysis Package,” Adv. Software Eng., Vol. 4, pp. 163.
8. Fei, D-Y., Thomas, J. D., and Rittgers, S. E., 1994, “The Effect of Angle and Flow Rate Upon Hemodynamics in Distal Vascular Graft Anastomoses: A Numerical Model Study,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 116, pp. 331-336.
9. Fry, D. L., 1969, “Certain Histological and Chemical Response of the Vascular Interface to Acutely Mechanical Stress in the Aorta of Dog,” Circ. Res., Vol. 24, pp. 93-125.
10. Fung, Y. C., 1984, Biodynamics: Circulation, Springer-Verlag, New York.
11. Giddens, D. P., Zarins, C. K., and Glagov, S., 1993, “The Role of Fluid Mechanics in the Localization and Detection of Atherosclerosis,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 115, pp. 558-594.
12. Grondin, C. M., 1984, “Late Results of Coronary Artery Grafting: Is there a Flag on the Field?” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., Vol. 87, pp. 161-166.
13. Hartman, C. W., Kong, Y., and Margolis, J. R., et al., 1976, “Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery: Correlation of Angiographic, Symptomatic and Functional Improvement at 1 Year,” Am. J. Cardiol., Vol. 37, pp. 352-357.
14. Imparato, A. M., and Braceo, A. et al., 1972, “Intimal and Neointimal Fibrous Proliferation Causing Failure of Arterial Reconstruction,” Surgery, Vol. 72, pp. 1007-1017.
15. Kajiya, F., Tsujioka, K., Ogasawara, Y., Wada Y., Matsuoka, S., Kanazawa, S., Hiramatsu, O., Tadaoka, S., Goto, M., and Fujiwara, T., 1987, “Analysis of Flow Characteristics in Poststenotic Regions of the Human Coronary Artery during Bypass Graft Surgery,” Circulation, Vol. 76, pp. 1092-1100.
16. Keynton, R. S., Rittgers, S. E., and Shu, M. C. S., 1991, “The Effect of Angle and Flow Rate Upon Hemodynamics in Distal Vascular Graft Anastomoses: An In Vitro Model Study,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 113, pp. 458-463.
17. Ku, D. N., Giddens, D. P., Phillips, D. J., and Strandness, D. E. Jr., 1985, “Hemodynamics of the Normal Human Carotid Bifurcation: In Vivo and In Vitro Studies,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., Vol. 11, pp. 13-26.
18. Nazemi, N., Kleinstreuer, C., and Archie, J. P. Jr., 1990, “Pulsatile TwoDimensional Flow in a Carotid Artery Bifurcation,” J. Biomechanics, Vol. 23, pp. 1013-1037.
19. Ojha, M., Ethier, R. C., Johnston, W. K., and Cobbold, R. S. C., 1990, “Steady and Pulsatile Flow Fields in an End-to-Side Arterial Anastomosis Model,” J. Vase. Surg., Vol. 12, pp. 747-753.
20. Pietrabissa, R., Inzoli, F., and Fumero, R., 1990, “Simulation Study of the Fluid Dynamics of Aorto-Coronary Bypass,” J. Biomed. Eng., Vol. 12, pp. 419-424.
21. Schettler, G., Nerem, R. N., Schmid-Schonbein, H., Marl, H., and Diehm, C., 1983, Fluid Dynamics as a Localizing Factor for Atherosclerosis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
22. Sottiurai, V. S., Yao, J. S. T., Flinn, W. R., and Batson, R. C., 1983, “Intimal Hyperplasia and Neointima: An Ultrastructural Analysis of Thrombosed Grafts in Humans,” Surgery, Vol. 93, pp. 809-817.
23. Sottiurai, V. S., Yao, J. S. T., Batson, R. C., Sue, S. L., Jones, R., and Nakamura, Y. A., 1989, “Distal Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: Histopathological Character and Biogenesis,” Ann. Vase. Surg., Vol. 1, pp. 26-33.
24. Steinman, D. A., Vinh, B., Ethier, R. C., Ojha, M., Cobbold, R. S. C., and Johnston, K. W., 1993, “A Numerical Simulation of Flow in a Two-Dimensional End-to-Side Anastomosis Model,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 115, pp. 112-118.
25. Texon, M., 1980, Hemodynamics Basis of Atherosclerosis, Hemisphere, Washington, DC.
26. Yoshida, Y., Yamaguchi, T., Caro, C. G., Glagov, S., and Nerem, R. M., 1988, Role of Blood Flow in Atherogenesis, Springer-Verlag.
27. White, S. S., Zarins, C. K., Giddens, D. P., Bassiouny, H., Loth, F., Jones, S. A., and Glagov, S., 1993, “Hemodynamic Patterns in Two Models of End-to-Side Vascular graft Anastomoses: Effects of Pulsatility, Flow Division, Reynolds Number and Hood Length,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 115, pp. 104-111.