Planning Keypress and Reaching Responses: Effects of Response Location and Number of Potential Effectors

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1464-1478

  Adam, Jos J ^a   Taminiau, Bettine ^a   van Veen, Natasja ^a   Ament, Bart ^a   Rijcken, Jons M ^a   Meijer, Kenneth ^a   Pratt, Jay ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

precuing; reaction time; response location; response selection; spatial coding

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECALL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57749188956     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0011975     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abrams R.A., Meyer D.E.M., and Kornblum S. Eye-hand coordination: Oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1990) 529-543
2. Adam J.J., Backes W., Rijcken J., Hofman P., Kuipers H., and Jolles J. Rapid visuomotor preparation in the human brain: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 16 (2003) 1-10
3. Adam J.J., Hommel B., and Umiltà C. Preparing for perception and action: I. The role of grouping in the response-cuing task. Cognitive Psychology 46 (2003) 302-358
4. Adam J.J., Hommel B., and Umiltà C. Preparing for perception and action: II. Automatic and effortful processes in response-cuing. Visual Cognition 12 (2005) 1444-1473
5. Adam J.J., Keyson D.V., and Paas F.G.W.C. Vibro-tactual choice reaction time in precuing task. Human Movement Science 16 (1997) 549-565
6. Adam J.J., Parthoens S., and Pratt J. Distinct mechanisms for planning keypress and reaching responses: A developmental study. Human Movement Science 25 (2006) 293-309
7. Adam J.J., and Pratt J. Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 1092-1106
8. Adam J.J., Taminiau B., and Pratt J. Planning keypress and reaching responses: Manipulating number of effectors and preparation interval. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 (2007) 813-827
9. Adam J.J., and Van Veggel L.M.A. Manipulating procedural variables in a spatial precuing task. Acta Psychologica 81 (1992) 97-114
10. Andersen R.A., and Buneo C.A. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25 (2002) 189-220
11. Bock O., and Eversheim U. The mechanisms of movement preparation: A precuing study. Behavioural Brain Research 108 (2000) 85-90
12. Buckolz E., Hewey D., Khan M., and Alain C. The influence of attention and response factors upon the spatial precue effect. Human Movement Science 13 (1994) 719-744
13. Diedrichsen J., Hazeltine E., Kennerley S., and Ivry R.B. Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 493-498
14. Diedrichsen J., Ivry R.B., Hazeltine E., Kennerley S., and Cohen A. Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 64-77
15. Duncan J. Response selection errors in spatial choice reaction tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (1977) 415-423
16. Duncan J. Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In: Inui T., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (1996), MIT Press, London 549-578
17. Eimer M. Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 837-854
18. Fitts P.M., and Deininger R.L. S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (1954) 483-492
19. Hackley S.A., and Valle-Inclán F. Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal?. Biological Psychology 64 (2003) 27-45
20. Heister G., Schroeder-Heister P., and Ehrenstein W.H. Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In: Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. (Eds). Stimulus-response compatibility (1990), North-Holland, Amsterdam 117-143
21. Hodgson T.L., Müller H.J., and O'Leary M.J. Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 308-321
22. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research 55 (1993) 270-279
23. Hommel B., Ridderinkhof K.R., and Theeuwes J. Cognitive control of attention and action: Issues and trends. Psychological Research 66 (2002) 215-219
24. Hommel B., and Schneider W.X. Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 392-420
25. Klemmer E.T. Time uncertainty in simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (1956) 179-184
26. Kornblum S. Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science 2 (1965) 55-56
27. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 253-270
28. Leuthold H., Sommer W., and Ulrich R. Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 (1996) 307-323
29. MacKenzie C.L. Structural constraints on human finger movements. In: Goodman D., Wilberg R.B., and Franks I.M. (Eds). Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (1983), North Holland, Amsterdam 157-173
30. Matsumoto E., Misaki M., and Miyauchi S. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: The effect of crossed-hand position. Experimental Brain Research 158 (2004) 9-17
31. Medendorp W.P., Goltz H.C., Crawford J.D., and Vilis T. Integration of target and effector information in human posterior parietal cortex for the planning of action. Journal of Neurophysiology 93 (2005) 954-962
32. Morin R.E., and Grant D.A. Learning and performance on a key-pressing task as a function of the degree of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (1955) 39-47
33. Müsseler J., van der Heijden A.H.C., and Kerzel D. Visual space perception and action: Introductory remarks. Visual Cognition 11 (2004) 129-136
34. Nicoletti R., Umiltà C., and Ládavas E. Compatibility due to the coding conflict of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica 57 (1984) 133-143
35. Niemi P., and Näätänen R. Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 89 (1981) 133-162
36. Olivier I., Audiffren M., and Ripoll H. Age-related differences in the preparatory processes of motor programming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 69 (1998) 49-65
37. Pashler H. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 1023-1040
38. Pellizzer G., and Hedges J.H. Motor planning: Effect of directional uncertainty with discrete spatial cues. Experimental Brain Research 150 (2003) 276-289
39. Pellizzer G., and Hedges J.H. Motor planning: Effect of directional uncertainty with continuous spatial cues. Experimental Brain Research 154 (2004) 121-126
40. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1980) 3-25
41. Pratt J., Adam J.J., and O'Donnell C. Effector selection influences inhibition of return. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 17 (2005) 319-328
42. Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12 (1986) 277-285
43. Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. The acquisition of task-specific productions and modification of declarative representations in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117 (1988) 182-196
44. Proctor R.W., and Wang H. Set- and element-level stimulus-response compatibility effects for different manual response sets. Journal of Motor Behavior 29 (1997) 351-365
45. Rakic P., Bourgeois J.P., and Goldman-Rakic P.S. Synaptic development of the cerebral cortex: Implications for learning, memory, and mental illness. Progress in Brain Research 102 (1994) 227-243
46. Reeve T.G., and Proctor R.W. On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 541-553
47. Reeve T.G., and Proctor R.W. The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects. In: Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. (Eds). Stimulus-response compatibility (1990), North-Holland, Amsterdam 163-180
48. Requin J. Toward a psychobiology of preparation for action. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in motor behavior (1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam 373-398
49. Riggio L., Gawryszewski L., and Umiltà C. What is crossed in crossed-hand effects?. Acta Psychologica 62 (1986) 89-100
50. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., and Sheliga B.M. Space and selective attention. In: Umiltà C., and Moscovitch M. (Eds). Attention and perfor-mance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 231-265
51. Schneider W.X. VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition 2 (1995) 331-375
52. Stins J.F., and Michaels C.F. Stimulus-target compatibility for reaching movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 756-767
53. Trick L.M., and Enns J.T. Lifespan changes in attention: The visual search task. Cognitive Development 13 (1998) 369-386
54. Umiltà C., and Nicoletti R. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In: Proctor R.W., and Reeve T.G. (Eds). Stimulus-response compatibility (1990), North-Holland, Amsterdam 89-116
55. Wallace R.J. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (1971) 354-360
56. Weeks D.J., Proctor R.W., and Beyak B. Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: Evidence for spatial coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48A (1995) 367-383