Planning keypress and reaching responses: Manipulating number of effectors and preparation interval

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 813-827

  Adam, Jos J ^a   Taminiau, Bettine ^a   Pratt, Jay ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 34848836046     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440600890680     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adam, J. J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2003). Preparing for perception and action (I): The role of grouping in the response-cuing paradigm. Cognitive Psychology, 46(3), 302-358.
2. Adam, J. J., Hommel, B., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Preparing for perception and action (II): Automatic and effortful processes in response-cuing. Visual Cognition, 12, 1444-1473.
3. Adam, J. J., Parthoens, S., & Pratt, J. (2006). Distinct mechanisms for preparing keypress and reaching responses: A developmental study. Human Movement Science, 25, 293-309.
4. Adam, J. J., & Pratt, J. (2004). Dissociating visual attention and effector selection in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1092-1106.
5. Bock, O., & Eversheim, U. (2000). The mechanism of movement preparation: A precuing study. Behavioural Brain Research, 108, 85-90.
6. Buckolz, E., Hewey, D., Khan, M., & Alain, C. (1994). The influence of attention and response factors upon the spatial precue effect. Human Movement Science, 13, 719-744.
7. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
8. Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188-196.
9. Klemmer, E. T. (1956). Time uncertainty in simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 179-184.
10. Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273-296.
11. Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162.
12. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
13. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
14. Proctor, R. W., & Wang, H. (1997). Set- and element-level stimulus-response compatibility effects for different manual response sets. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 351-365.
15. Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 163-180). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 231-265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
18. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 231-274). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
19. Schneider, W. X. (1995). VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition, 2, 331-375.
20. Stins, J. F., & Michaels, C. F. (1997). Stimulus-target compatibility for reaching movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 756-767.
21. Trick, L. M., & Enns, J. T. (1998). Lifespan changes in attention: The visual search task. Cognitive Development, 13, 369-386.
22. Van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologia, 69, 83-94.
23. Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.