Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan, and Critical Perspectives

Ethics and International Affairs

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 69-92

  Smith, William ^a   Brassett, James ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749141578     PISSN: 08926794     EISSN: 17477093     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2008.00130.x     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Daniele Archibugi and David Held, eds., Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995)
2. David Held, “Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Global Order: A New Agenda,” in James Bohman and M. Lutz-Bachmann, eds., Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997)
3. Richard Falk, Law in an Emerging Global Village: A Post-Westphalian Perspective (Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers, 1998).
4. James Bohman,“ International Regimes and Democratic Governance: Political Equality and Influence in Global Institutions,” International Affairs 75, no. 3 (1999), pp. 499–513
5. Molly Cochran, “A Democratic Critique of Cosmopolitan Democracy: Pragmatism from the Bottom-Up,” European Journal of International Relations 8, no. 4 (2002), pp. 517–548
6. John S. Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).
7. This article is part of an international and interdisciplinary project, entitled Deliberation and Global Governance: Theory, Practice, Critique,” that draws together theorists of deliberation and scholars of global governance with a view to mapping the emerging terrain and exploring potential synergies. Participants involved with this project include James Bohman, Garrett Brown, Molly Cochran, Nancy Fraser, Randall Germain, Patrick Hayden, Richard Higgott, Kim Hutchings, Tony McGrew, Peter Newell, Philip Pettit, and Jan Art Scholte. Comments on this paper and questions about the larger project are welcome at jamesbrassett@yahoo.com.
8. Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau, Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)
9. Richard Higgott, “Contested Globalization: The Changing Context and Normative Challenges,” Review of International Studies 26 (2000), pp. 131–153
10. James Brassett and Richard Higgott, “Building the Normative Dimension(s) of a Global Polity,” Review of International Studies 29 (2003), pp. 29–55.
11. James Bohman and William Rehg, eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997)
12. Jon Elster, ed., Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)
13. James S. Fishkin and Peter Laslett, eds., Debating Deliberative Democracy (London: Blackwell Publishing, 2003).
14. Samuel Freeman, “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29, no. 4 (2000), p. 378.
15. Joshua Cohen, “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” in Bohman and Rehg, eds., Deliberative Democracy, pp. 415–416
16. John Rawls, The Law of Peoples, With “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited” (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 140–141.
17. James Bohman, Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: M Press, 1996), pp. 45–46
18. Jurgen Habermas, “Religion in the Public Sphere,” European Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 1 (2006), p. 10.
19. John S. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp.168–69
20. Iris Marion Young, Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 135.
21. We leave open the possibility that, as suggested recently in an interesting article by Simone Chambers, public reasons may, on occasion, argue against openness and transparency (Simone Chambers, “Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation,” Journal of Political Philosophy 12, no. 4 [2004], pp. 389–410).
22. Rawls, The Law of Peoples, p. 55.
23. Joshua Cohen, “Minimalism About Human Rights: The Best We Can Hope For?” Journal of Political Philosophy 12, no. 2 (2004), pp. 195–196.
24. Rawls, The Law of Peoples, p. 41.
25. Cohen, “ Minimalism About Human Rights, ” p. 212.
26. Rawls, The Law of Peoples, p. 61.
27. The Law of Peoples., p. 56.
28. The Law of Peoples., pp. 84–85.
29. The Law of Peoples., p. 84.
30. The Law of Peoples., pp. 61–62.
31. The Law of Peoples., pp. 142–143.
32. Allen Buchanan and Robert O. Keohane,“The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions,” Ethics& International Affairs 20, no. 4 (2006), p. 421.
33. Ethics& International Affairs., pp. 425–426.
34. David Held, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995)
35. David Held, Global Covenant (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004)
36. David Held, “Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities and Deficits,” in David Held and Anthony McGrew, eds., Governing Globalization: Power, Authority, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002).
37. Held, Democracy and the Global Order, p. 282.
38. David Held,“ Law of States, Law of Peoples, Legal” Theory 8, no. 1 (2002), pp. 24–26
39. David Held, “Principles of Cosmopolitan Order,” in Gillian Brock and Harry Brighouse, eds., The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 10–27.
40. James Bohman,“ Cosmopolitan Republicanism,” Monist 84, no. 1 (2001), pp. 3–22
41. James Bohman, “Republican Cosmopolitanism,” Journal of Political Philosophy 12, no. 3 (2004), pp. 336–352
42. James Bohman, “The Democratic Minimum: Is Democracy a Means to Global Justice?” Ethics & International Affairs 19, no. 1 (2005), pp. 101–116
43. James Bohman, Democracy Across Borders: From Demos to Dêmoi (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2007).
44. Bohman, Democracy Across Borders, p. 41.
45. Bohman, Republican Cosmopolitanism, pp. 340–341.
46. Jürgen Habermas, Kant s Idea of Perpetual Peace: At wo Hundred Years Historical Remove, m Ciaran Cronin and Pablo de Greiff, eds., The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998)
47. Jurgen Habermas, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, ed. and trans. Max Pensky (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001)
48. Jurgen Habermas, The Divided West, trans. Ciaran Cronin (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).
49. Habermas, The Postnational Constellation, p. 107.
50. Habermas, The Divided West, pp. 142–143.
51. Held,“ Principles of the Cosmopolitan Order,” p. 18
52. Bohman, Democracy Across Borders, pp. 114–120
53. Habermas, “Kant's Idea of Perpetual Peace,” pp. 185–186.
54. Bohman, “ Republican Cosmopolitanism, ” p. 437.
55. Held,“Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities and Deficits, ” p. 313.
56. Habermas,“ Kant's Idea of Perpetual Peace,” pp. 190–191.
57. Bohman, “Republican Cosmopolitanism,” p. 349
58. Habermas, The Divided West, p. 142
59. Patrizia Nanz and Jens Steffek, “Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere,” in David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, eds., Global Governance and Public Accountability (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), pp. 198–200.
60. Robert A. Dahl, “Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic's View,” in Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon, eds., Democracy's Edges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 32–34
61. Will Kymlicka, Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 238–239
62. David Miller, Citizenship and National Identity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000), pp. 89–96.
63. Bohman,“ Cosmopolitan Republicanism,” p. 17.
64. Robert Fine and Will Smith,“ Jurgen Habermas's Theory of Cosmopolitanism,” Constellations 10, no. 4 (December 2003), pp. 469–487.
65. Held,“ Principles of the Cosmopolitan Order,” pp. 25–27
66. Bohman, Democracy Across Borders, p. 124
67. Habermas, The Divided West, pp. 140–141.
68. Held,“ Law of States, Law of Peoples,” pp. 24–26.
69. Held,“Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities and Deficits,” p. 313.
70. Held,“ Law of States, Law of Peoples,” p. 32.
71. Bohman, “The Democratic Minimum,” p. 108.
72. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, pp. 115–139
73. Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics.
74. John S. Dryzek, “Transnational Democracy,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no. 1 (1999), pp. 30–51
75. Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics, p. 161.
76. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, p. 120.
77. Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics, pp. 136–143.
78. Deliberative Global Politics., p. 1.
79. Deliberative Global Politics., p. 27.
80. Deliberative Global Politics., p. 154.
81. Deliberative Global Politics., pp. 54–58.
82. Deliberative Global Politics., p. 52.
83. Bohman,“ Cosmopolitan Republicanism,” p. 17.
84. This point is made forcibly by Molly Cochran in her sympathetic critique of Dryzek' s theory; her own “pragmatist” approach…presented as an alternative to the “deliberative” models advanced by Bohman and Dryzek…allows for the possibility that “international public spheres” can be conceptualized as “institutions” in their own right, with some degree of “public authority” (Cochran, “A Democratic Critique of Cosmopolitan Democracy,” p. 532).
85. Dryzek, Deliberative Global Politics, p. 52.
86. Deliberative Global Politics., pp. 20–21.
87. Robert O. Keohane, “The Contingent Legitimacy of Multilateralism,” GARNET Working Paper No. 09/06 (2006), p. 3.
88. James Brassett,“ A Pragmatic Approach to the Tobin Tax Campaign: The Politics of Sentimental Education,” European Journal of International Relations (forthcoming)
89. David Chandler, Constructing Global Civil Society (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2004)
90. Michael Goodhart, “Civil Society and the Problem of Global Democracy,” Democratization 12, no. 1 (2005), pp. 1–21.