Selecting Optimal Hemodialysis Catheters: Material, Design, Advanced Features, and Preferences

Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 186-191

  Tal, Michael G ^a   Ni, Nina ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

catheter complications; dialysis catheters; hemodialysis

Indexed keywords

POLYURETHAN; SILICONE; SILVER;

ARTICLE; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER THROMBOSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIALYSIS CATHETER; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; MATERIAL COATING; NONHUMAN; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE;

CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; RENAL DIALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 57649094528     PISSN: 10892516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2008.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Tokars J.L., Frank M., Alter M.J., et al. National surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2000. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/dialysis/dialysis00_notags.pdf Accessed June 23, 2008
2. Allon M. Dialysis catheter-related bacteremia: Treatment and prophylaxis. Am J Kidney Dis 44 (2004) 779-791
3. Mermel L.A. Prevention of intravascular catheter infections: Insights and prospects for hemodialysis catheters. Nephrologie 22 (2001) 449-451
4. Liangos O., Gul A., Madias N.E., et al. Long-term management of the tunneled venous catheter. Semin Dialysis 19 (2006) 158-164
5. Ash S.R. Fluid mechanics and clinical success of central venous catheters for dialysis: Answers to simple but persisting problems. Semin Dialysis 20 (2007) 237-256
6. Leblanc M., Bosc J.-Y., Paganini E.P., et al. Central venous dialysis catheter dysfunction. Adv Renal Replace Ther 4 (1997) 377-389
7. Borow M., and Crowley J.G. Prevention of thrombosis of central venous catheters. J Cardiovasc Surg 27 (1986) 571-574
8. Trerotola S.O., Shah H., Johnson M., et al. Randomized comparison of high-flow versus conventional hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10 (1999) 1032-1038
9. Alomari A.I., and Falk A. The natural history of tunneled hemodialysis catheters removed or exchanged: A single-institution experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18 (2007) 227-235
10. Saxena A., and Panhotra B.R. Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: An appraisal of developments in designing an infection-resistant 'dream dialysis-catheter.'. Nephrology 10 (2005) 240-248
11. Chatzinikolaou I., and Raad I.I. Intravascular catheter-related infections: A preventable challenge in the critically ill. Semin Respir Infect 15 (2000) 264-271
12. Stillman R.M., Soliman F., Garcia L., et al. Etiology of catheter-associated sepsis. Arch Surg 112 (1977) 1497-1499
13. Trerotola S.O. Hemodialysis catheter placement and management. Radiology 215 (2000) 651-658
14. Stewart P.S., and Costerton J.W. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358 (2001) 135-138
15. Appelgren P., Ransjo U., Bindslev L., et al. Surface heparinization of central venous catheters reduces microbial colonization in vitro and in vivo: Results from a prospective, randomized trial. Crit Care Med 24 (1996) 1482-1489
16. Thomson P.C., Stirling C.M., Geddes C.C., et al. Vascular access in haemodialysis patients: A modifiable risk factor for bacteraemia and death. Q J Med 100 (2007) 415-422
17. National Kidney Foundation. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis 48 suppl 1 (2006) S187-S317
18. US Renal Data System. Clinical and economic issues in vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Access 1 (2002) 1-29
19. Oliver M.J., Edwards L.J., Treleaven D.J., et al. Randomized study of temporary hemodialysis catheters. Int J Artif Organs 25 (2002) 40-44
20. Weijmer M.C., Vervloet M.G., and ter Wee P.M. Prospective followup of a novel design hemodialysis catheter for the jugular site: Lower infection rates and improved survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 12 (2001) A1575
21. Schwab S.J., and Beathard G. The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: Hate living with them, but can't live without them. Kidney Int 56 (1999) 1-17
22. Fan P.Y. Acute vascular access: New advances. Adv Renal Replace Ther 1 (1994) 90-98
23. In: Pieters P.C., Tisnado J., and Mauro M.A. (Eds). Venous Catheters: A Practical Manual (2003), Thieme, New York, New York
24. El-Shahawy A., and Gadallah F. Acute hemodialysis catheters: How safe are they?. Int J Artif Organs 19 (1996) 571-573
25. Little M.A., O'Riordan A., Lucey B., et al. A prospective study of complications associated with cuffed, tunnelled haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16 (2001) 2194-2200
26. Kairaitis L.K., and Gottlieb T. Outcome and complications of temporary haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14 (1999) 1710-1714
27. Oliver M.J., Callery S.M., Thorpe K.E., et al. Risk of bacteremia from temporary hemodialysis catheters by site of insertion and duration of use: A prospective study. Kidney Int 58 (2000) 2543-2545
28. Saad T.F. Bacteremia associated with tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 34 (1999) 1114-1124
29. Beathard G.A. Management of bacteremia associated with tunneled-cuffed hemodialysis catheters. J Am Soc Nephrol 10 (1999) 1045-1049
30. Randolph A.G., Cook D.J., Gonzales C.A., et al. Tunneling short-term central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infection: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Crit Care Med 26 (1998) 1452-1457
31. Lund G.B., Trerotola S.O., Scheel P.F., et al. Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists. Radiology 198 (1996) 467-472
32. Eggimann P. Prevention of intravascular catheter infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 20 (2007) 360-369
33. Funaki B. Central venous access: A primer for the diagnostic radiologist. Am J Radiol 179 (2002) 309-318
34. Ash S.R. The evolution and function of central venous catheters for dialysis. Semin Dialysis 14 (2001) 416-424
35. Wright J.I. Using polyurethanes in medical applications (2006), Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry
36. Solomon D.D., Arnold W.L., Martin N.D., et al. An in vivo method for the evaluation of catheter thrombogenicity. J Biomed Mater Res 21 (1987) 43-57
37. Sherertz R.J., Carruth W.A., Marosok R.D., et al. Contribution of vascular catheter material to the pathogenesis of infection: The enhanced risk of silicone in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 29 (1995) 635-645
38. Trerotola S.O., Kraus M., Shah H., et al. Randomized comparison of split tip versus step tip high-flow hemodialysis catheters. Kidney Int 62 (2002) 282-289
39. Linder L.E., Curelaru I., Gustavsson I., et al. Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: A comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 8 (1984) 399-406
40. Jones D.S., Garvin C.P., and Gorman S.P. Relationship between biomedical catheter surface properties and lubricity as determined using textural analysis and multiple regression analysis. Biomaterials 25 (2005) 1421-1428
41. Schillinger F., Schillinger D., Montagnac R., et al. Post catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: Comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular accesses. Nephrol Dial Transplant 6 (1991) 722-724
42. Tenke P., Riedl C.R., Jones G.L., et al. Bacterial biofilm formation on urologic devices and heparin coating as preventive strategy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 23 (2004) 67-74
43. Krafte-Jacobs B., Sivit C.J., Mejia R., et al. Catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children: Comparison of catheters with and without heparin bonding. J Pediatr 126 (1995) 50-54
44. Pierce C.M., Wade A., and Mok Q. Heparin-bonded central venous lines reduce thrombotic and infective complications in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med 26 (2000) 967-972
45. Covidien company website. http://www.kendallvasculartherapy.com/VascularTherapy/pageBuilder.aspx?topicID=70019&breadcrumbs=81037:0,70018:0 Accessed June 24, 2008
46. Carmeda company website. http://www.carmeda.com/pages.asp?r_id=2208 Accessed June 24, 2008
47. Trerotola S.O., Johnson M.S., Shah H., et al. Tunneled hemodialysis catheters: Use of a silver-coated catheter for prevention of infection. A randomized study. Radiology 207 (1998) 491-496
48. Bambauer R., Mestres P., Schiel R., et al. Large bore catheters with surface treatments versus untreated catheters for blood access. J Vascular Access 2 (2001) 97-105
49. Chatzinikolaou I., Finkel K., Hanna H., et al. Antibiotic-coated hemodialysis catheters for the prevention of vascular catheter-related infections: A prospective, randomized study. Am J Med 115 (2003) 352-357
50. Touch briefings. http://www.touchbriefings.com/cdps/cditem.cfm?cid=5&nid=2603 Accessed June 24, 2008
51. Bard company website. http://www.crbard.com/news/innovations/HemoSplitDialysisCatheterwithBioBlocCoating.cfm Accessed June 24, 2008
52. Gilbert R.E., and Harden M. Effectiveness of impregnated central venous catheters for catheter related blood stream infection: A systematic review. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21 (2008) 235-245
53. Hanna H., Benjamin R., Chatzinikolaou I., et al. Long-term silicone central venous catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin decrease rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection in cancer patients: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 22 (2004) 3163-3171
54. Darouiche R.O., Berger D.H., Khardori N., et al. Comparison of antimicrobial impregnation with tunneling of long-term central venous catheters: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 242 (2005) 193-200
55. Angiotech company press release. Angiotech's Novel 5-FU Central Venous Catheter Receives FDA 510(k) Clearance April 17, 2008. Angiotech, Vancouver, Canada, 2008 Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS129447+17-Apr-2008+PRN20080417. Accessed June 24, 2008
56. PR Newswire. 960-Patient study demonstrates zero blood stream infection in patients treated with Angiotech's novel 5-FU central venous catheter. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4PRN/is_2008_March_18/ai_n24928092 Accessed June 24, 2008
57. Richard III H.M., Hastings G.S., Boyd-Kranis R.L., et al. A randomized, prospective evaluation of the tesio, ash split, and opti- flow hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12 (2001) 431-435
58. Trerotola S.O., Kraus M., Shah H., et al. Randomized comparison of split tip versus step tip high-flow hemodialysis catheters. Kidney Int 62 (2002) 282-289
59. Tal M.G., Peixoto A.J., Crowley S.T., et al. Comparison of side hole versus non side hole high flow hemodialysis catheters. Hemodialysis Int 10 (2006) 63-67
60. Mareels G., De Wachter D.S., and Verdonck P.R. Computational fluid dynamics: Analysis of the Niagara hemodialysis catheter in a right heart model. Artif Organs 28 (2004) 639-648
61. Beathard G. Catheter thrombosis. Semin Dial 14 (2001) 441-445
62. Twardowski Z.J., and Moore H.L. Side holes at the tip of chronic hemodialysis catheters are harmful. J Vasc Access 2 (2001) 8-16
63. Warren S., O'Conner D., and Steinberg S. Recirculation: A uremic syndromecomplicating the use of prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. J Dialysis 2 (1978) 251-259
64. Senecal L., Saint-Sauveur E., and Leblanc M. Blood flow and recirculation rates in tunneled hemodialysis catheters. ASAIO J 50 (2004) 94-97
65. Tal M.G. Comparison of recirculation percentage of the Palindrome catheter and standard hemodialysis catheters in a swine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16 (2005) 1237-1240
66. Kakkos T.K., Haddad G.K., Haddad R.K., et al. Effectiveness of a new tunneled catheter in preventing catheter malfunction: A comparative study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 (2008) 1018-1026