We learn what we do: Developing a repertoire of writing practices in an instant messaging world

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 203-211

  Jacobs, Gloria E ^a  

^a ST JOHN FISHER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57549114896     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/JAAL.52.3.3     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alvermann, D. (2006). Ned and Kevin: An online discussion that challenges the 'not-yet adult' cultural model. In K. Pahl & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Travel notes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice (pp. 39-56). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
2. Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Baron, N.S. (1984). Computer mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, 18(2), 118-141.
4. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
5. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Cobb, C. (2002, October 12). Kewl or 2 much. Orlando Sentinel, p. E1.
7. Davies, J. (2006). Escaping to the borderlands: An exploration of the Internet as a cultural space for teenaged Wiccan girls. In K. Pahl & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Travel notes from the New Literacy Studies: Instances of practice (pp. 57-71). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
8. Dressman, M., O'Brien, D., Rogers, T., Ivey, G., Wilder, P., Alvermann, D., et al. (2006). Problematizing adolescent literacies: Four instances, multiple perspectives. In J.V. Hoffman, D.L. Schallert C.M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.), Fifty-fifth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 141-154). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
9. Edwards, L.Y. (2005). Victims, villains, and vixens. In S.R. Mazzarella (Ed.), Girl wide web: Girls, the Internet, and the negotiation of identity (pp. 13-30). New York: Lang.
10. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
11. Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
13. Gee, J.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
14. Gee, J.P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.
15. Goodman, K. (1973). Miscue analysis: Applications to reading instruction. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
17. Gustavson, L. (2007). Youth learning on their own terms: Creative practices and classroom teaching. New York: Routledge.
18. Guzzetti, B.J., & Gamboa, M. (2004). Zines for social justice: Adolescent girls writing on their own. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 408-436. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.4.4
19. Hartman, P. (2006). "Loud on the inside": Working-class girls, gender, and literacy. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 82-117.
20. Helderman, R. (2003, May 20). Click by click, teens polish writing. The Washington Post, p. B1.
21. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575-611. doi:10.3102/00346543071004575
22. Jacobs, G. (2004). Complicating contexts: Issues of methodology in researching the language and literacies of instant messaging. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 394-406. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.4.3
23. Jacobs, G. (2006). Fast times and digital literacy: Participation roles and portfolio construction within instant messaging. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 171-196. doi:10.1207/s15548430j1r3802-3
24. Jacobs, G. (2008). People, purposes, and practices: Insights from cross-disciplinary research into instant messaging. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 469-493). New York: Routledge.
25. Knobel, M. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse, and social practice. New York: Lang.
26. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2006). Weblog worlds and constructions of effective and powerful writing: Cross with care, and only where signs permit. In K. Pahl & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Travel notes from the New Literacy Studies: Instances of practice (pp. 72-94). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
27. Lam, W.S.E. (2000). Literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenage writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482. doi:10.2307/3587739
28. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
29. Lee, C. (2003). How does instant messaging affect interaction between the genders? Retrieved May 12, 2005, from www.stanford .edu/class/pwr3-25/ group2/projects.html
30. Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A. (2008). Writing, technology and teens. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
31. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved August 4, 2005, from www.pewinternet.org
32. Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470-501. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5
33. Martineau, P. (2007, September 12). Tapping instant messaging. Education Week, 1, 10.
34. Millard, E. (2006). Transformative pedagogy: Teachers creating a literacy of fusion. In K. Pahl & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Travel notes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice (pp. 234-253). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
35. Nardi, B. (2005). Beyond bandwidth: Dimensions of connection in interpersonal communication. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 14(2), 91-130. doi:10.1007/s10606-004-8127-9
36. National Commission on Writing in America's Schools and Colleges. (2003). The neglected "R": The need for a writing revolution (No. 997548). New York: College Board.
37. National Council of Teachers of English. (2003). Rest assured-Students, teachers, and language are "alive and kickn." Retrieved August 18, 2006, from www.ncte.org/pubs/chron/highlights/117019.htm
38. National Writing Project. (2007). About NWP. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/doc/about.csp
39. Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335-358). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Ogbu, J. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic disengagement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Reinking, D. (1998). Introduction: Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typo-graphic world (pp. xi-xxx), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Rodriguez, R. (1982). Hunger of memory: The education of Richard Rodriguez. Boston: David R. Godine.
43. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship, In J.V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Street, B.V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography, and education. New York: Addison Wesley.
47. Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667-701. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00031.x
48. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
50. Warschauer, M. (2000). Language, identity, and the Internet. In B. Kolko, L. Nakamura, & G.B. Rodman (Eds.), Race in cyberspace (pp. 151-170). New York: Routledge.