Complicating contexts: Issues of methodology in researching the language and literacies of instant messaging

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 394-406

  Jacobs, Gloria E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10044256518     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.39.4.3     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. ALVERMANN, D.E. (2002). Preface. In D.E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. vii-xii). New York: Peter Lang.
2. ATKINSON, J.M., & HERITAGE, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. AXTMAN, K. (2002, December 12). "r u online?": the evolving lexicon of wired teens. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved March 19, 2004, from http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1212/p01s01-ussc.html
4. BARON, N. (1984). Computer-mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, 18(1), 118-141.
5. BARON, N., & LING, R. (2003). IM and SMS: A linguistic comparison. Paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference, Toronto, ON.
6. BARTON, D., HAMILTON, M., & IVANIC, R. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
7. BIJKER, W.E., HUGHES, T., & PINCH, T. (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. BRANDT, D., & CLINTON, K. (2002). Limits of the local: Explaining perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 337-356.
9. COBBS, C. (2002, October 12). Kewl or 2 much. Orlando Sentinel. Retrieved October 15, 2002, from www.orlandosentinel.com/features/lifestyle/orl- livinstant12101202.story
10. CRYSTAL, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. FAIRCLOUGH, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
12. FERRARA, K., BRUNNER, H., & WHITTEMORE, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8-34.
13. FINDERS, M. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
14. FOUCAULT, M. (1980). Power/knowledge (C. Gordon, Trans.). New York: Harvester Press.
15. GARCIA, A., & JACOBS, J. (1998). The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom. Qualitative Sociology, 21, 299-317.
16. GARCIA, A., & JACOBS, J. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 337-367.
17. HANKS, W. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 43-79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. HERBSLEB, J.D., ATKINS, D.L., BOYER, D.G., HANDEL, M., & FINHOLT, T.A. (2002, April). Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer-human Interaction, Minneapolis, MN.
19. HERRING, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved March 22, 2004, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html
20. HULL, G., & SCHULTZ, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 575-612.
21. LAM, W.S.E. (2000). Literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenage writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-482.
22. LATOUR, B. (1997). On actor network theory: A few clarifications. Retrieved December 1, 2000, from http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/ nettime-1-9801/msg00019.html
23. LEANDER, K. (2002, December). Situated literacies, digital practices, and the constitution of space-time. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
24. LEE, J. (2002, September 19). Nu shortcuts in school r 2 much 4 teachers. New York Times online edition. Retrieved March 22, 2004, from http://www.learningexperts.com/McQuillan/NYTimes%20092002%20RU%20Ready.pdf
25. LENHART, A., RAINIE, L., & LEWIS, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved March 19, 2004, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=36
26. LEWIS, C., & FABOS, B. (2000). But will it work in the heartland? A response and illustration. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 462-469.
27. LUKE, A. (1994). The social construction of literacy in the primary school. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Macmillan Education Australia.
28. NARDI, B., WHITTAKER, S., & BRADNER, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. Paper presented at the Computer Support Cooperative Work Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
29. NEILSEN, L. (1998). Playing for real: Performative texts and adolescent identities. In D.E. Alvermann, K. Hinchman, D. Moore, S. Phelps, & D. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. NEW LONDON GROUP. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
31. NEW LONDON GROUP. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-37). London: Routledge.
32. NUA INTERNET SURVEYS. (2001). NetValue: IM grows in popularity in Asia. Retrieved, March 19, 2004, from www.nua.com/surveys/in dex.cgi?f=VS&art id=905357066&rel=true
33. NUA INTERNET SURVEYS. (2002). Nielsen NetRatings: IM programs draw US kids and teens online. Retrieved, March 19, 2004, from www.nua.com/surveys/ index.cgi?f=VS&art id=903358261&rel=true
34. OCHS, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-71). New York: Academic Press.
35. RABINOW, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
36. RANDALL, N. (2002). Lingo online: A report on the language of the keyboard generation. MSNCA. Retrieved March 19, 2004, from http://www.arts. uwaterloo.ca/-nrandall/LingoOnline-finalreport.pdf
37. RINTEL, E.S., MULLHOLLAND, J., & PITTMAN, J. (2001). First things first: Internet relay chat openings. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(3). Retrieved March 19, 2004, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue3/
38. ROGOFF, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. SCHEGLOFF, E. (1986). Sequencing in conversational openings. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 346-380). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
40. SCHEGLOFF, E., JEFFERSON, G., & SACKS, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
41. SMITH, M., CADIZ, J.J., & BURKHALTER, B. (2000). Conversation trees and threaded chats. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
42. STAR, S.L. (Ed.). (1995). Cultures of computing. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
43. STREET, B.V. (1995). Social literacies. London: Longman.
44. VOIDA, A., NEWSTETTER, W.C., & MYNATT, E.D. (2002). When conventions collide: The tensions of instant messaging attributed. Paper presented at the Computer Human Interaction Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
45. WERRY, C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
46. YATES, S. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: A corpus based study. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 29-45). Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.