Misunderstandings about object-oriented design: Experiences using code reviews

SIGCSE'08 - Proceedings of the 39th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 97-101

  Turner, Scott A ^a   Quintana Castillo, Ricardo ^a   Pérez Quiñones, Manuel A ^a   Edwards, Stephen H ^a  

^a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Code review; Evaluation; Object oriented; Reading code; Student learning

Indexed keywords

CODE REVIEW; EVALUATION; OBJECT-ORIENTED; READING CODE; STUDENT LEARNING;

COMPUTERS; CURRICULA; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 57449114942     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1352135.1352169     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Ben-Ari. M. (1988). Constructivism in Computer Science Education. Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM Press, New York, NY.
2. Bloom, B.S., Taxonomy of educational objectives. 1984: Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
3. Deimel, L.E., Jr., The uses of program reading, in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 1985, ACM Press, p. 5-14.
4. Denning, T., M. Kelly, et al. (2007). Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense? Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. Covington, Kentucky, USA, ACM Press.
5. Eckerdal, A. and M. Thune (2005). Novice Java programmers' conceptions of "object" and "class", and variation theory. Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. Caparica, Portugal, ACM
6. Edwards, S. H. (2003). Rethinking computer science education from a test-first perspective. Companion of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications. Anaheim, CA, USA, ACM Press.
7. Edwards, S. H. (2004). Using software testing to move students from trial-and-error to reflection-in-action. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. Norfolk, Virginia, USA, ACM Press.
8. Gamma, E., R. Helm, et al. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison Wesley Professional.
9. Gamer, S., P. Haden, et al.(2005) My program is correct but it doesn't run: a preliminary investigation of novice programmers' problems. ACE '05: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, pp. 173-180, Darlinghurst, Australia, 2005. Australian Computer Society, Inc.
10. Hamilton, S., L. Brunell, et al. (2006). Peer Review in Engineering Courses as a Learning Tool. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Chicago, IL.
11. Holland, S., R. Griffiths, et al. (1997) Avoiding object misconceptions. SIGCSE '97: Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 131-134, New York, NY, USA.
12. Lewis, T. L., M. B. Rosson, et al. (2004). What do the experts say?: teaching introductory design from an expert's perspective. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. Norfolk, Virginia, USA, ACM Press.
13. Lewis, T. L., J. D. Chase, et al. (2005). The effects of individual differences on CS2 course performance across universities. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, ACM Press.
14. Or-Bach, R. and I. Lavy. (2004) Cognitive activities of abstraction in object orientation: an empirical study. SIGCSE Buletin, 36(2):82-86.
15. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
16. Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. New York, Harcourt and Brace.
17. A. Powell, S.C. Turner, M. Tungare, M.A. Perez-Quifiones, S.H. Edwards (2006) An Online Peer Review System for Teacher Artifact In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006, AACE, Chesapeake, VA, pp. 126-133.
18. Ruehr, F. and G. Orr (2002). "Interactive program demonstration as a form of student program assessment." Consortium for Computing Sciences in Colleges 18(2): 65-78.
19. Sanders, K. and L. Thomas (2007). Checklists for grading object-oriented CS1 programs: concepts and misconceptions. Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. Dundee, Scotland, ACM,
20. Sitthiworachart, J. and M. Joy (2004). Effective peer assessment for learning computer programming. Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, ACM Press.
21. Topping, K. (1998). "Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities." Review of Educational Research 68(3): 249-276.
22. Trytten, D. A. (2005). A design for team peer code review. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. St. Louis, Missouri, USA, ACM Press.
23. Wankat, P. and F. Oreovicz (1992). Teaching Engineering. Mcgraw-Hill College.
24. Zeller, A. (2000). Making students read and review code. Proceedings of the 5th annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. Helsinki, Finland, ACM Press.