MoBiS-Q - a tool for evaluating the success of mobile business services

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 238-245

  Markova, Maiju ^a   Aula, Anne ^a   Vainio, Teija ^a   Wigelius, Heli ^a   Kulju, Minna ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Measurement; Mobile business services; Productivity; Questionnaire; Usability

Indexed keywords

FLOW INTERACTIONS; MOBILE COMPUTING; MOBILE DEVICES; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

BUSINESS PROCESSES; CASE STUDIES; CONSTRUCTION SITES; MEASUREMENT TOOLS; MOBILE BUSINESS SERVICES; MOBILE BUSINESSES; PASSENGER TRANSPORTS; PRODUCTIVITY MEASURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPECIFIC DEMANDS; USABILITY; WORK PROCESSES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 57349143763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1377999.1378013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Alahuhta, P., Ahola, J. and Hakala, H. Mobilizing Business Applications - A survey about the opportunities and challenges of mobile business applications and services in Finland. Technology Review 167/2005. Tekes, Helsinki, 2005.
2. Brooke, J. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Available online at http://www.usability.serco.eom/trump/documents/Suschapt.doc.
3. Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM., 41, 8 (1998), 49-55.
4. Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending. Management Science, 42, 4 (1996), 541-558.
5. Brynjolfsson, E. The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology. Communications of the ACM, 36, 12 (1993), 67-77.
6. Chen, M., Zhang, D., & Zhou, L. Providing web services to mobile users: the architecture design of an m-service portal. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 3, 1, (2005), 1-18.
7. Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A., & Norman, K.L. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human computer interface. Proceedings of CHI'88, (1988), 213-218.
8. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, September (1989), 318-340.
9. Dix, A., Rodden, T., Davies, N., Trevor, J., Friday, A., & Plafreyman, K. Exploiting Space and Location as a Design Framework for Interactive Mobile Systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 3, (2000), 285-321.
10. Duyshart, B, Walker, D, Mohamed, S. & Hampton, K. An example of developing a business model for ICT adoption on construction projects - the National Museum of Australia project. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10, 3 (2003), 179-192.
11. th Hawaii Int. Conference on Systems Sciences, Big Island Hawaii, (2005), 32a
12. Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M. & Hornbæk, K. Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? Proceedings of CHI 2000, (2000), 345-352.
13. Gebauer, J., & Shaw, M.J. Success Factors and Impacts of Mobile Business Applications: Results from a Mobile e-Procurement Study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 3, (2004), 19-41.
14. Hornbæk, K. Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (2006), 79-102.
15. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals - part 11: guidance on usability (ISO/IEC9421-11: 1998).
16. Kaasinen, E. User Acceptance of Mobile Services -Value, Ease of Use, Trust and Ease of Adoption, VTT Information Technology, Helsinki, 2005.
17. Kakihara, M., Sorensen, C., Expanding the ' mobility' concept. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, 22, 3, (2001), 33-37
18. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. The Balanced Scorecard. Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1996.
19. Kemppilä, S. and Lönnqvist, A. Subjective Productivity Measurement. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 2, 2 (2003), 531-537.
20. Lewis, J.R. IBM Computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions of use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 1 (1995), 57-78.
21. Lynch, W. & Riedel, J. Measuring Employee Productivity: A guide to self-assessment tools. William M. Mercer & Institute for Health and Productivity Management, 2001.
22. NASA Task Load Index. Available online at http://iac.dtic.mil/hsiac/docs/ TLX-UserManual.pdf.
23. Nielsen, J. & Levy, J. Measuring usability: preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, 37, 4 (1994), 66-75.
24. Nielsen, J. Usability engineering. Academic Press Inc., Boston, 1993.
25. Rangone, A., & Renga, F. B2e mobile internet: an exploratory study of Italian applications. Business Process Management Journal, 12, 3, (2006), 330-343.
26. Ryu, Y.S. Development of Usability Questionnaires for Electronic Mobile Products and Decision Making Methods. Doctoral dissertation, State University, Virginia, 2005.
27. Ryu, Y.S., & Smith-Jackon, T.L. Reliability and Validity of the Mobile Phone Usability Questionnaire (MPUQ). Journal of Usability Studies, 2, 1, (2006), 39-53.
28. Sink, D.S. Productivity management: planning, measurement and evaluation, control and improvement. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985.
29. Software Usability Measurement Inventory. Information on line at http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/sumi/.
30. Steinbock, D. The Mobile Revolution: The Making of Mobile Services Worldwide. Kogan Page, GBR, London, 2005.
31. Sørensen, C-F., Wang, A.I., & Conradi, R., Support of smart work processes in context of rich environments. In Krogstie, J., Kautz, K., & Allen, D. (eds.), IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Mobile Information Systems (MOBIS'2005), (Leeds, UK, December 6-7 2005). Springer, New York, USA, (2005), 15-30.
32. Uusi-Rauva, E. Yleiskatsaus mittausmenetelmiin. In Uusi-Rauva, E. (ed.) Tuottavuus - mittaa ja menesty. Vantaa, (1996), 41 - 74 (in Finnish).
33. Wiberg, M. "Anytime, anywhere" in the context of mobile work. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and technology I-V. Idea Group, Inc. 2005.