Changes in Effective Connectivity Models in the Presence of Task-Correlated Motion: An fMRI Study

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 49-63

  Gavrilescu, Maria ^a,b   Stuart, Geoffrey W ^a,c   Waites, Anthony ^d   Jackson, Graeme ^d   Svalbe, Imants D ^b   Egan, Gary F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^d AUSTIN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Effective connectivity; Functional connectivity; Multivariate normality; Path analysis; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOCOMOTION; MOTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

BRAIN MAPPING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0842304296     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10149     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Beckmann C, Smith SM. 2002. Probabilistic Extensions to Independent Component Analysis in FMRI. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2-6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-Rom in NeuroImage, Vol. 16, No. 2.
2. Büchel C, Friston KJ. 1997. Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cerebral Cortex 7:768-778.
3. Büchel C, Coull JT, Friston KJ. 1999. The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. Science 283:1538-1541.
4. Bullmore E, Brammer MJ, Rabe-Hesketh S, Curtis VA, Morris RG, Williams SCR, Sharma T, McGuire PK. 1999. Methods for diagnostic and treatment of stimulus-correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 7:38-48.
5. Bullmore E, Horwitz B, Honey G, Brammer M, Williams S, Sharma T. 2000. How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? NeuroImage 11:289-301.
6. Bullmore E, Long C, Suckling J, Fadili J, Calvert G, Zelaya F, Carpenter TA, Brammer M. 2001. Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: resampling methods in time and wavelet domains. Hum Brain Mapp 12:61-78.
7. Chou C-P, Bentler PM. 1995. Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p 37-55.
8. Christoff K, Whitfield SL, Shelton AL, Panitz DA, Gabrieli JDE. 2002. Comparison of BOLD hemodynamic responses across different brain regions. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2-6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-Rom in NeuroImage, Vol. 16, No. 2.
9. Della-Magiore V, Sekuler AB, Grady CL, Bennet PJ, Sekuler R, McIntosh AR. 2000. Corticolimbic interactions associated with performance on a short-term memory task are modified by age. J Neurosci 20:8410-8416.
10. Esposito F, Formisano E, Seifritz E, Goebel R, Morrone R, Tedeschi G, Di Salle F. 2002. Spatial independent component analysis of functional MRI time-series: To what extent do results depend on the algorithm used? Hum Brain Mapp 16:146-157.
11. Fletcher P, Büchel C, Josephs O, Friston KJ, Dolan R. 1999. Learning-related neural responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. Cereb Cortex 9:168-178.
12. Fox P, Ingham R, George MS, Mayberg H, Ingham J, Roby J, Martin C, Jerabek P. 1997. Imaging human intra-cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS. NeuroReport 8:2787-2791.
13. Freire L, Mangin J-F. 2001. Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion. NeuroImage 14:709-722.
14. Friston KJ. 1994. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis. Hum Brain Mapp 2:56-78.
15. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ. 1993a. Functional connectivity: The principal component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13:5-14.
16. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. 1993b. Time-dependant changes in effective connectivity measured with PET. Hum Brain Mapp 1:69-80.
17. Friston KJ, Büchel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ. 1997. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. NeuroImage 6.218-229.
18. Gavrilescu M, Shaw ME, Stuart GW, Eckersley P, Svalbe ID, Egan GF. 2002. Simulation of the effects of global normalization procedures in functional MRI. NeuroImage 17:532-542.
19. Genovese R, Lazar NA, Nichols T. 2002. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage 15:870-878.
20. Gonçalves MS, Hall DA, Johnsrude IS, Haggard MP. 2001. Can meaningful effective connectivities be obtained between auditory cortical regions? NeuroImage 14:1353-1360.
21. Hampson M, Peterson BS, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Gore JC. 2002. Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images. Hum Brain Mapp 15:247-262.
22. Honey DG, Fu CHY, Kim J, Brammer MJ, Croudace TJ, Suckling J, Pich EM, Williams SCR, Bullmore ET. 2002. Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. NeuroImage 17:573-582.
23. Horwitz B. 1994. Data Analysis paradigm for metabolic-flow data: Combining neural modeling and functional neuroimaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2:112-122.
24. Hoyle RH. 1995. The structural equation modeling approach: Basic Concepts and fundamental issues. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p 1-15.
25. Hu L, Bentler PM. 1995. Evaluating model fit In: Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p 76-99.
26. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady JM, Smith S. 2002. Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 17:825-841.
27. Jennings JM, McIntosh AR, Kapur S. 1998. Mapping neural interactivity onto regional activity: an analysis of semantic processing and response mode interactions. NeuroImage 7:244-254.
28. Kendall, M. 1994 In: Stuart A, Keith, J, editors. Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
29. Krüger G, Glover GH. 2001. Physiological noise in oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 46:631-637.
30. Lowe MJ, Mock BJ, Soreson JA. 1998. Functional connectivity in single and multiple echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. NeuroImage 2:119-132.
31. Lund TE. 2001. fcMRI-Mapping functional connectivity or correlating cardiac-induced noise? Magn Reson Med 46:628.
32. MacCallum RC. 1995. Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p 16-36.
33. MacCallum RC, Wegener DT, Uchino BN, Fabrigar LR. 1993. The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychol Bull 114:185-199.
34. Maguire EA, Mummery CJ, Büchel C. 2000. Patterns of hippocampal cortical interaction dissociate temporal lobe memory subsystems. Hippocampus 10:475-482.
35. Mardia KV. 1970. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika 57:519-530.
36. McIntosh AR. 1999. Mapping cognition to the brain through neural interactions. Memory 7:523-548.
37. McIntosh AR, Gonzales-Lima F. 1994 Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2:2-22.
38. McIntosh AR, Rajah MN, Lobaugh NJ. 1999. Interactions of prefrontal cortex in relation to awareness in sensory learning. Science 284:1531-1533.
39. McKeown MJ, Makeig S, Brown SS, Jung T-P, Kindermann SS, Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. 1998. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into spatial independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 6:160-168.
40. Nyberg L, McIntosh AR, Cabeza R, Nilsson LG, Houle S, Habib R, Tulving E. 1996. Network analysis of positron emission tomography regional cerebral blood flow data: Ensemble inhibition during episodic memory retrieval. J Neurosci 11:3753-3759.
41. 2* dependence of low frequency functional connectivity. NeuroImage 16:985-992.
42. Petersson KM, Nichols TE, Poline JB, Holmes AP. 1999. Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging I. Non-inferential methods and statistical models. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 354:1239-1260.
43. Price CJ, Friston KJ. 1999. Scanning patients with tasks they can perform. Hum Brain Mapp 8:102-108.
44. Raykov T, Widaman KF. 1995. Issues in applied structural equation modeling research. Struct Equat Model 2:289-318.
45. Rowe J, Stephan KE, Friston KJ, Frackowiak R, Lees A, Passingham R. 2002. Attention to action in Parkinson's disease. Impaired effective connectivity among frontal cortical regions. Brain 125:276-289.
46. West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. 1995. Structural equation models with nonnormal variable: Problems and remedies. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p 56-75.
47. Worsley KJ, Friston KJ. 1995. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited-again. NeuroImage 2:173-181.
48. Wright S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Ann Math Stat.5:161-215.
49. Xiong J, Parsons LM, Gao J, Fox PT. 1999. Interregional connectivity to primary motor cortex revealed using MRI resting state images. Hum Brain Mapp 8:151-156.