메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 22, 2006, Pages 3769-3786

Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; Missing data; Multiple imputations; Software; Verification bias

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

EID: 33750847223     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2494     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (55)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 0000460102 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interval estimation for a binomial proportion (Pkg: p101-133)
    • Brown LD, Cai TT, Dasgupta A. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion (Pkg: p101-133). Statistical Science 2001; 16(2):101-133.
    • (2001) Statistical Science , vol.16 , Issue.2 , pp. 101-133
    • Brown, L.D.1    Cai, T.T.2    Dasgupta, A.3
  • 3
    • 0020728415 scopus 로고
    • Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias
    • Begg CB, Greenes RA. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. Biometrics 1983; 39:207-215.
    • (1983) Biometrics , vol.39 , pp. 207-215
    • Begg, C.B.1    Greenes, R.A.2
  • 4
    • 0013248938 scopus 로고
    • Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias
    • Zhou XH. Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias. Communications in Statistics, Part A - Theory and Methods 1993; 22:3177-3198.
    • (1993) Communications in Statistics, Part A - Theory and Methods , vol.22 , pp. 3177-3198
    • Zhou, X.H.1
  • 5
    • 0037368751 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests
    • Kosinski AS, Barnhart HX. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 2003; 59:163-171.
    • (2003) Biometrics , vol.59 , pp. 163-171
    • Kosinski, A.S.1    Barnhart, H.X.2
  • 7
    • 0032377357 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Approximate is better than 'exact' for interval estimation of binomial proportions
    • Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than 'exact' for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician 1998; 52:119-126.
    • (1998) The American Statistician , vol.52 , pp. 119-126
    • Agresti, A.1    Coull, B.A.2
  • 8
    • 84946650481 scopus 로고
    • Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference
    • Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1927; 22:209-212.
    • (1927) Journal of the American Statistical Association , vol.22 , pp. 209-212
    • Wilson, E.B.1
  • 9
    • 84928455110 scopus 로고
    • Logit-based interval estimation for binomial data using the Jeffreys prior
    • Rubin DB, Schenker N. Logit-based interval estimation for binomial data using the Jeffreys prior. Sociological Methodology 1987; 17:131-144.
    • (1987) Sociological Methodology , vol.17 , pp. 131-144
    • Rubin, D.B.1    Schenker, N.2
  • 10
    • 33750866983 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving interval estimation of binomial proportions
    • submitted
    • Zhou X, Li C. Improving interval estimation of binomial proportions, 2005, submitted.
    • (2005)
    • Zhou, X.1    Li, C.2
  • 15
    • 84950918760 scopus 로고
    • Multiple imputation for interval estimation from simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse
    • Rubin DB, Schenker N. Multiple imputation for interval estimation from simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986; 81:366-374.
    • (1986) Journal of the American Statistical Association , vol.81 , pp. 366-374
    • Rubin, D.B.1    Schenker, N.2
  • 16
    • 0007071163 scopus 로고
    • Asymptotic results for multiple imputation
    • Schenker N, Welsh AH. Asymptotic results for multiple imputation. The Annals of Statistics 1988; 16:1550-1566.
    • (1988) The Annals of Statistics , vol.16 , pp. 1550-1566
    • Schenker, N.1    Welsh, A.H.2
  • 17
    • 84972537494 scopus 로고
    • Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input (Disc: p558-573)
    • Meng XL. Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input (Disc: p558-573). Statistical Science 1994; 9:538-558.
    • (1994) Statistical Science , vol.9 , pp. 538-558
    • Meng, X.L.1
  • 18
    • 84950758368 scopus 로고
    • The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (C/R: p541-550)
    • Tanner MA, Wong WH. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (C/R: p541-550). Journal of the American Statistical Association 1987; 82:528-540.
    • (1987) Journal of the American Statistical Association , vol.82 , pp. 528-540
    • Tanner, M.A.1    Wong, W.H.2
  • 19
    • 0242691411 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • edition. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC
    • SAS Procedure Guide, version 8 edition. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, 1999.
    • (1999) SAS Procedure Guide, Version 8
  • 21
  • 22
    • 0021345230 scopus 로고
    • Diaphanography as a means of detecting breast cancer
    • Marshall V, Williams DC, Smith KD. Diaphanography as a means of detecting breast cancer. Radiology 1981; 150:339-343.
    • (1981) Radiology , vol.150 , pp. 339-343
    • Marshall, V.1    Williams, D.C.2    Smith, K.D.3
  • 23
    • 0022370337 scopus 로고
    • Assessment of diagnostic technologies: Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selective verified patients
    • Greenes R, Begg CB. Assessment of diagnostic technologies: methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selective verified patients. Investigative Radiology 1985; 20:751-756.
    • (1985) Investigative Radiology , vol.20 , pp. 751-756
    • Greenes, R.1    Begg, C.B.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.