Multiply-imputing confidential characteristics and file links in longitudinal linked data

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3050, Issue , 2004, Pages 290-297

  Abowd, John M ^a   Woodcock, Simon D ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

LINKED DATUM; MARGINAL DISTRIBUTION; SYNTHETIC DATA;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 35048847594     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25955-8_23     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abowd, J. M., J. I. Lane, and R. Prevost: Design and conceptual issues in realizing analytical enhancements through linkages of employer and employee data. In Proceedings of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (2000).
2. Abowd, J.M., and S. D. Woodcock: Disclosure limitation in longitudinal linked data In P. Doyle, J. I. Lane, J. J. Theeuwes, and L.V. Zayatz (eds), Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies (2000) 215-278. North-Holland.
3. Fienberg, S. E.: A radical proposal for the provision of micro-data samples and the preservation of confidentiality. Carnegie Mellon University Department of Statistics Technical Report No. 611 (1994).
4. Fienberg, S. E. and U. E. Makov: Confidentiality, uniqueness, and disclosure limitation for categorical data. J. Official Statistics 14(4) (1998) 385-397.
5. Fienberg, S. E., U. E. Makov, and R. J. Steele: Disclosure limitation using perturbation and related methods for categorical data. J. Official Statistics 14(4) (1998) 485-502.
6. Kennickell, A. B.: Multiple imputation and disclosure protection: the case of the 1995 Survey of Consumer Finances. SCF Working Paper (1997).
7. LEHD Program: The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program: Employment Dynamics Estimates project versions 2.2 and 2.3. LEHD Technical Paper 2002-05 (2002).
8. Raghunathan, T. J., J. P. Reiter, and D. Rubin: Multiple imputation for statistical disclosure limitation. J. Official Statistics 19(1) (2003) 1-16.
9. Reiter, J. P.: Satisfying disclosure restrictions with synthetic data sets. J. Official Statistics 18(4) (2002) 531-544.
10. Reiter, J. P.: Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Survey Methodology 29 (2003) 181-188.
11. Reiter, J. P.: Releasing multiply-imputed, synthetic public use microdata: An illustration and empirical study. J. Royal Statistical Society, Series A (forthcoming).
12. Reiter, J. P.: Significance tests for multi-component estimands from multiplyimputed, synthetic microdata. J. Statistical Planning and Inference (forthcoming).
13. Reiter, J. P.: Using CART to generate partially synthetic public use microdata. Duke University working paper (2003).
14. Rubin, D. B.: Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. (1987) Wiley.
15. Rubin, D. B.: Discussion of statistical disclosure limitation. J. Official Statistics 9(2) (1993) 461-468.
16. Statistical Disclosure Control in Practice. (1996) Springer-Verlag.