Significance tests for multi-component estimands from multiply imputed, synthetic microdata

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 365-377

  Reiter, Jerry P ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Disclosure; Multiple imputation; Significance tests; Synthetic data

Indexed keywords

EID: 14044261229     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abowd J.M. Woodcock S.D. Disclosure limitation in longitudinal linked data In: Doyle P. Lane J. Zayatz L. Theeuwes J. (Eds.) Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies 2001 215-277 North-Holland Amsterdam
2. Dandekar R.A. Cohen M. Kirkendall N. Sensitive micro data protection using Latin hypercube sampling technique In: Domingo-Ferrer J. (Ed.) Inference Control in Statistical Databases 2002 117-125 Springer Berlin
3. Dandekar R.A. Domingo-Ferrer J. Sebe F. LHS-based hybrid microdata versus rank swapping and microaggregation for numeric microdata protection In: Domingo-Ferrer J. (Ed.) Inference Control in Statistical Databases 2002 153-162 Springer Berlin
4. Fienberg, S.E., Steele, R.J., Markov, U.E., 1996. Statistical notions of data disclosure avoidance and their relationship to traditional statistical methodology: Data swapping and log-linear models. In: Proceedings of Bureau of Census 1996 Annual Research Conference, pp. 87-105.
5. Fienberg S.E. Markov U.E. Steele R.J. Disclosure limitation using perturbation and related methods for categorical data J. Official Statist. 14 1998 485-502
6. Franconi L. Stander J. A model based method for disclosure limitation of business microdata Statistician 51 2002 1-11
7. Franconi, L., Stander, J., 2003. Spatial and non-spatial model-based protection procedures for the release of business microdata. Statist. Comput. 13, 295-306.
8. Fuller W.A. Masking procedures for microdata disclosure limitation J. Official Statist. 9 1993 393-406
9. Gelman A. Carlin J.B. Stern H.S. Rubin D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis 1995 Chapman & Hall London
10. Kennickell A.B. Multiple imputation and disclosure protection: the case of the 1995 Survey of Consumer Finances In: Alvey W. Jamerson B. (Eds.) Record Linkage Techniques, 1997 1997 248-267 National Academy Press Washington, DC
11. Li, K.H., 1985. Hypothesis testing with multiple imputation-with emphasis on mixed-up frequencies in contingency tables. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Chicago.
12. Li K.H. Raghunathan T.E. Rubin D.B. Large sample significance levels from multiply imputed data using moment-based statistics and an f reference distribution J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86 1991 1065-1073
13. Little R.J.A. Statistical analysis of masked data J. Official Statist. 9 1993 407-426
14. Liu, F., Little, R.J.A., 2002. Selective multiple imputation of keys for statistical disclosure control in microdata. In: ASA Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, pp. 2133-2138.
15. Meng X.I. Rubin D.B. Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply-imputed data sets Biometrika 79 1992 103-111
16. Polettini, S., 2003. Maximum entropy simulation for microdata protection. Statist. Comput. 13, 307-320
17. Polettini S. Franconi L. Stander J. Model-based disclosure protection In: Domingo-Ferrer J. (Ed.) Inference Control in Statistical Databases 2002 83-96 Springer Berlin
18. Raghunathan, T.E., 1987. Large sample significance levels from multiply-imputed data. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Harvard University.
19. Raghunathan T.E. Reiter J.P. Rubin D.B. Multiple imputation for statistical disclosure limitation J. Official Statist. 19 2003 1-16
20. Reiter J.P. Satisfying disclosure restrictions with synthetic data sets J. Official Statist. 18 2002 531-544
21. Reiter, J.P., 2003. Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Surv. Methodology 29, 181-188
22. Reiter, J.P., 2004. Releasing multiply-imputed, synthetic public use microdata: An illustration and empirical study. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A, forthcoming.
23. Rubin D.B. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys 1987 Wiley New York
24. Rubin D.B. Discussion: Statistical disclosure limitation J. Official Statist. 9 1993 462-468
25. Schafer J.L. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data 2000 Chapman & Hall London
26. Willenborg L. de Waal T. Elements of Statistical Disclosure Control 2001 Springer New York