Regression algorithm correcting for partial volume effects in arterial spin labeling MRI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1362-1371

  Asllani, Iris ^a,b   Borogovac, Ajna ^a   Brown, Truman R ^a  

^a Department of Neurology and the Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain   (United States)

^b Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

ASL; CBF; Linear regression; MRI; Partial volume effects; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MAPPING; LINEAR REGRESSION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; NONLINEAR DEPENDENCIES; PARTIAL VOLUME EFFECT; PERFUSION; REGRESSION ALGORITHMS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; WEIGHTING COEFFICIENT;

TISSUE;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SPIN LABELING;

EID: 57149093221     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21670     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Donahue MJ, Lu H, Jones CK, Pekar JJ, van Zijl PC. An account of the discrepancy between MRI and PET cerebral blood flow measures. A high-field MRI investigation. NMR Biomed 2006;19:1043-1054.
2. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, Esposito G, van Horn JD, Yang Y, Duyn J, Smith AM, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:450-456.
3. Du Y, Tsui BM, Frey EC. Partial volume effect compensation for quantitative brain SPECT imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:969-976.
4. Kops ER, Reilhac A. Correction of partial volume effects for PET imaging: a comparison study. IEEE 2004:4125-4129.
5. Schmidt K, Sokoloff L. A computationally efficient algorithm for determining regional cerebral blood flow in heterogeneous tissues by positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:618-632.
6. Aston JA, Cunningham VJ, Asselin MC, Hammers A, Evans AC, Gunn RN. Positron emission tomography partial volume correction: estimation and algorithms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:1019-1034.
7. Alsop DC, Detre JA. Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1236-1249.
8. Golay X, Hendrikse J, Lim TC. Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:10-27.
9. Johnson NA, Jahng GH, Weiner MW, Miller BL, Chui HC, Jagust WJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Schuff N. Pattern of cerebral hypoperfusion in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment measured with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2005;234:851-859.
10. Parkes LM. Quantification of cerebral perfusion using arterial spin labeling: two-compartment models. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:732-736.
11. Asllani I, Borogovac A, Wright C, Sacco R, Brown TR, Zarahn E. An investigation of statistical power for continuous arterial spin labeling imaging at 1.5 T. Neuroimage 2008;39:1246-1256.
12. Noth U, Meadows GE, Kotajima F, Deichmann R, Corfield DR, Turner R. Cerebral vascular response to hypercapnia: determination with perfusion MRI at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using a pulsed arterial spin labeling technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1229-1235.
13. Parkes LM, Rashid W, Chard DT, Tofts PS. Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:736-743.
14. Buxton R. Introduction to functional MRI. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
15. Kirk RG. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1995. p 10.
16. Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, Listerud J, Gonzalez-At JB, Schnall MD, Detre JA. Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:242-254.
17. Herscovitch P, Raichle ME. What is the correct value for the brain - blood partition coefficient for water? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5:65-69.
18. Werner R, Norris DG, Alfke K, Mehdorn HM, Jansen O. Improving the amplitude-modulated control experiment for multislice continuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1096-1102.
19. Aguirre GK, Detre JA, Zarahn E, Alsop DC. Experimental design and the relative sensitivity of BOLD and perfusion fMRI. Neuroimage 2002;15:488-500.
20. Worsley KJ, Liao CH, Aston J, Petre V, Duncan GH, Morales F, Evans AC. A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. Neuroimage 2002;15:1-15.
21. Zhou J, Golay X, van Zijl PC, Silvennoinen MJ, Kauppinen R, Pekar J, Kraut M. Inverse T(2) contrast at 1.5 Tesla between gray matter and white matter in the occipital lobe of normal adult human brain. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:401-406.
22. Asllani I, Habeck C, Scarmeas N, Borogovac A, Brown TR, Stern Y. Multivariate and univariate analysis of continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in Alzheimer's disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008;28:725-736.
23. Gee J, Ding L, Xie Z, Lin M, DeVita C, Grossman M. Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia exhibit distinct atrophy-behavior correlates: a computer-assisted imaging study. Acad Radiol 2003;10:1392-1401.
24. Swartz RH, Black SE, Sela G, Bronskill MJ. Cognitive impairment in dementia: correlations with atrophy and cerebrovascular disease quantified by magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Cognit 2002;49:228-232.