Taxonomy of performance measurement systems

Advances in Management Accounting

Volumn 17, Issue , 2008, Pages 247-288

  Henri, Jean François ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049087532     PISSN: 14747871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-7871(08)17009-5     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Abernethy M.A., and Guthrie C.H. An empirical assessment of the "fit" between strategy and management information system design. Accounting and Finance 34 2 (1994) 49-66
2. Abernethy M.A., and Lillis A.M. Interdependencies in organization design: A test in hospitals. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13 (2001) 107-129
3. Ahrens T., and Chapman C.S. Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 2 (2004) 271-301
4. Aldenderfer M.S., and Blashfield R.K. Cluster analysis (1984), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
5. Anderson J.C., and Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 3 (1988) 411-423
6. Ansari S., and Euske K.J. Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 6 (1987) 549-570
7. Atkinson A.A., Waterhouse J.H., and Wells R.B. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review 38 3 (1997) 25-37
8. Baines A., and Langfield-Smith K. Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 7-8 (2003) 675-698
9. Banker R.D., Chang H., and Pizzini M.J. The balanced scorecard: Judgemental effects of performance measures linked to strategy. The Accounting Review 79 1 (2004) 1-24
10. Bhimani A., and Langfield-Smith K. Structure, formality and the importance of financial and non-financial information in strategy development and implementation. Management Accounting Research 18 (2007) 3-31
11. Bisbe J., and Otley D. The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 8 (2004) 709-737
12. Bititci U.S., Turner T., and Begemann C. Dynamics of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 6 (2000) 692-704
13. Boland R.J., and Pondy L.R. Accounting in organizations: A union of natural and rational perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 2/3 (1983) 223-234
14. Boulianne E. Linking strategic choices and management accounting systems scope: An empirical analysis. In: Epstein M.J., and Manzoni J. (Eds). Performance measurement and management control: A compendium of research (2002), Elsevier Science, Kidlington, Oxford
15. Bourne M., Mills J., Wilcox M., Neely A., and Platts K. Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 7 (2000) 754-771
16. Bouwens J., and Abernethy M.A. The consequences of customization on management accounting system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (2000) 221-241
17. Brockmann E.N., and Simmonds P.G. Strategic decision making: The influence of CEO experience and use of tacit knowledge. Journal of Managerial Issues IX 4 (1997) 454-467
18. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K.A., and Scott Long J. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage, Newburry Park, CA
19. Bruns W.J., and Waterhouse J.H. Budgetary control and organization structure. Journal of Accounting Research 13 2 (1975) 177-203
20. Burchell S., Clubb C., Hopwood A., and Hughes J. The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organization and Society 5 1 (1980) 5-27
21. Burns T., and Stalker G.M. The management of innovation (1961), Tavistock Publications, London
22. Carpenter M.A., and Fredrickson J.W. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal 44 3 (2001) 533-545
23. Cavalluzzo K.S., and Ittner C.D. Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 3-4 (2004) 243-267
24. Chandler A.D. Strategy and structure (1962), MIT Press, Cambridge
25. Chapman C.S. Reflections on a contingent view of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 2 (1997) 189-205
26. Chapman C.S. Accountants in organisational networks. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 8 (1998) 737-766
27. Chenhall R.H. Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 127-168
28. Chenhall R.H., and Langfield-Smith K. The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: An empirical investigation using a systems approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 3 (1998) 243-264
29. Chenhall R.H., and Morris D. The impact of structure, environment and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. The Accounting Review 61 1 (1986) 16-35
30. Chenhall R.H., and Morris D. Organic decision and communication processes and management accounting systems in entrepreneurial and conservative business organizations. Omega, International Journal of Management Science 23 5 (1995) 485-497
31. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) (1988), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
32. deHaas M., and Kleingeld A. Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: Enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Research 10 (1999) 233-261
33. Dent J.F. Tensions in the design of formal control systems: A field study in a computer company. In: Bruns W.J., and Kaplan R.S. (Eds). Accounting and management: Field study perspectives (1987), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
34. Dermer J. The strategic agenda: Accounting for issues and support. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 1-2 (1990) 67-76
35. Dixon J.R., Nanni A.J., and Vollman T.E. The new performance challenge-measuring operations for world-class competition (Dow Jones-Irwin ed.) (1990), Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL
36. Ewusi-Mensah K. The external organizational environment and its impact on management information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 6 4 (1981) 301-316
37. Feldman M.S., and March J.G. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (1981) 171-186
38. Fisher J. Use of nonfinancial performance measures. Journal of cost management 6 1 (1992) 31-38
39. Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R., & Voss, C. (1991). Performance measurement in service businesses. London: The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
40. Forza C., and Salvador F. Assessing some distinctive dimensions of performance feedback information in high performing plants. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 3 (2000) 359-385
41. Galbraith J. Designing complex organizations (1973), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
42. Gerdin J., and Greve J. Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research - A critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (2004) 303-326
43. Gerdin J., and Greve J. The appropriateness of statistical methods for testing contingency hypotheses in management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 7/8 (2008) 995
44. Gordon L.A., and Narayanan V.K. Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 1 (1984) 33-47
45. Gosselin M. An empirical study of performance measurement in manufacturing firms. The International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54 5/6 (2005) 419
46. Govindarajan V. Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 2 (1984) 125-135
47. Govindarajan V. A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal 31 4 (1988) 826-853
48. Govindarajan V., and Fisher J. Strategy, control systems, and resource sharing: Effects on business-unit performance. Academy of Management Journal 33 2 (1990) 259-285
49. Gul F.A., and Chia Y.M. The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 4-5 (1994) 413-426
50. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.) (1998), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
51. Hall M. The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (2008) 141-163
52. Henri J.-F. Performance measurement and organizational effectiveness: Bridging the gap. Managerial Finance 30 6 (2004) 93-123
53. Henri J.-F. Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 6 (2006) 529-558
54. Henri J.-F. Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 1 (2006) 77-103
55. Hofstede G. The poverty of management control philosophy. Academy of Management Review 3 3 (1978) 450-461
56. Hoque Z. A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: Impact on organizational performance. International Business Review 13 (2004) 485-502
57. Hoque Z., and James W. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12 (2000) 1-17
58. Hoque Z., Mia L., and Alam M. Market competition, computer-aided manufacturing and use of multiple performance measures: An empirical study. British Accounting Review 33 (2001) 23-45
59. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Evaluating model fit. In: Doyle R.H. (Ed). Structural equation modeling (1995), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
60. Hyvönen J. Strategy, performance measurement techniques and information technology of the firm and their links to organizational performance. Management Accounting Research 18 (2007) 343-366
61. Ittner C.D., and Larcker D.F. Quality strategy, strategic control systems, and organizational performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 3,4 (1997) 293
62. Ittner C.D., and Larcker D.F. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: A value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (2001) 349-410
63. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F., and Meyer M.W. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review 78 3 (2003) 725-758
64. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F., and Randall T. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 7-8 (2003) 715-741
65. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard - Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 1 (1992) 71-79
66. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action (Harvard Business School Press ed.) (1996), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
67. Kennerley M. Measuring performance in a changing business environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 23 2 (2003) 213-229
68. Kennerley M., and Neely A. A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 22 11 (2002) 1222-1245
69. Ketchen D.J., and Shook C.L. The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996) 441-458
70. Khandwalla P.N. The design of organizations (1977), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc, New York
71. Kuwaiti M.E. Performance measurement process: Definition and ownership. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 24 1 (2004) 55-78
72. Lee C., Lee K., and Pennings J.M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22 (2001) 615-640
73. Libby T., Salterio S.E., and Webb A. The balanced scorecard: The effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review 79 4 (2004) 1075-1094
74. Lingle J.H., and Schiemann W.A. From balanced scorecard to strategic gauges: Is measurement worth it. Management Review 8 3 (1996) 56-61
75. Lipe M.G., and Salterio S. A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (2002) 531-540
76. Lynch R.L., and Cross K.F. Measure up - Yardsticks for continuous improvement (1991), Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
77. Malina M.A., and Selto F.H. Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13 (2001) 47-90
78. Malina M.A., and Selto F.H. Choice and change of measures in performance measurement models. Management Accounting Research 15 (2004) 441-469
79. Markus M.L. Power, politics and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM 26 6 (1983) 430-444
80. Merchant K.A. The design of the corporate budgeting system: Influences on managerial behavior and performance. The Accounting Review 56 4 (1981) 813-829
81. Merchant K.A. Influences on departmental budgeting: An empirical examination of a contingency model. Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 3/4 (1984) 291-307
82. Meyer A.D., Tsui A.S., and Hinings C.R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal 36 6 (1993) 1175-1195
83. Mia L. The role of MAS information in organisations: An empirical study. The British Accounting Review 25 3 (1993) 269-285
84. Miles R.E., and Snow C.C. Organizational strategy, structure and process (1978), McGraw Hill, New York
85. Miller D. Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal 7 (1986) 233-249
86. Miller D. The structural environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management Journal 8 1 (1987) 55-76
87. Miller D. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996) 505-512
88. Miller D., and Dröge C. Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1986) 539-560
89. Miller D., Dröge C., and Toulouse J.-M. Strategic process and content as mediators between organizational context and structure. Academy of Management Journal 31 3 (1988) 544-569
90. Miller D., and Friesen P. Organizations: A quantum view (1984), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
91. Miller D., and Shamsie J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal 39 3 (1996) 519-543
92. Milliken F.J. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review 12 (1987) 133-143
93. Moores K., and Yuen S. Management accounting systems and organizational configuration: A life-cycle perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 26 (2001) 351-389
94. Nanni A.J., Dixon R., and Vollmann T.E. Integrated performance measurement: Management accounting to support the new manufacturing realities. Journal of Management Accounting Research 4 Fall (1992) 1-19
95. Naranjo-Gil D., and Hartmann F. How top management teams use management accounting systems to implement strategy. Journal of Management Accounting Research 18 (2006) 21
96. Naranjo-Gil D., and Hartmann F. Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 7-8 (2007) 735-756
97. Neely A., Adams C., and Kennerley M. The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success (2002), Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead
98. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York
99. Porter M.E. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors (1980), The Free Press, New York
100. Punj G., and Stewart D.W. Cluster analysis in marketing research: A review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research 20 (1983) 134-148
101. Said A.A., Elnaby H.R.H., and Wier B. An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of nonfinancial measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 15 (2003) 193-223
102. Scott T.W., and Tiesen P. Performance measurement and managerial teams. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (1999) 263-285
103. Simon H.A., Guetzkow H., Kozmetsky G., and Tyndall G. Centralization vs decentralization in organizing the controllers' department (1954), Controllership Foundation Inc, New York
104. Simons R. The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 1/2 (1990) 127-143
105. Simons R. Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal (1995), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
106. Simons R. Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy (Prentice Hall ed.) (2000), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
107. Spanos Y.E., and Lioukas S. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal 22 (2001) 907-934
108. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.) (2001), Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA
109. Tymon W.G., Stout D.E., and Shaw K.N. Critical analysis and recommendations regarding the role of perceived environmental uncertainty in behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting 10 (1998) 23-46
110. Vandenbosch B. An empirical analysis of the association between the use of executive support systems and perceived organizational competitiveness. Accounting Organizations and Society 24 (1999) 77-92
111. Van der Stede W.A., Chow C.W., and Lin T.W. Strategy, choice of performance measures, and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 18 (2006) 185-205
112. Vitale M.R., and Mavrinac S.C. How effective is your performance measurement system?. Management Accounting 77 2 (1995) 43-55
113. Waggoner D.B., Neely A.D., and Kennerley M.P. The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Production Economics 60-61 (1999) 53-60
114. Widener S.K. Association between strategic resource importance and performance measure use: The impact on firm performance. Management Accounting Research 17 (2006) 433-457
115. Wisner J.D., and Fawcett S.E. Linking firm strategy to operating decisions through performance measurement. Production and Inventory Management Journal 32 3 (1991) 5-11