Performance measurement and managerial teams

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 263-285

  Scott, Thomas W ^a   Tiessen, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000405436     PISSN: 03613682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00060-9     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bamber, E. M., & Bylinski, J. H. (1982). The audit team and the audit review process: an organisational approach. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1, 35-58.
2. Banker, R. D., & Datar, S. M. (1989). Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 27, 21-39.
3. Blinder, A. S. (Ed.). (1990). Paying for productivity: a look at the evidence. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
4. Brownell, P. (1981). Participation in budgeting, locus of control and organisational effectiveness. The Accounting Review, 56, 844-860.
5. Brownell, P. (1982). The role of accounting data in performance evaluation, budgetary participation, and organisational effectiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 12-27.
6. Burton, G. E. (1987) The "clustering effect": an idea-generation phenomenon during nominal group. Small Group Behaviour, 18, 224-238.
7. Casey, J. T., Gettys, C. F., Pliske, R. M., & Mehle, T. (1984). A partition of small group performance into information and social components. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 112-139.
8. Chenhall, R. H., & Brownell, P. (1988). The effect of participative budgeting on job satisfaction and performance: role ambiguity as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, 225-233.
9. Cohen, S. G. (1993). New approaches to teams and teamwork. In J. R. Galbraith, & E. E. Lawler, Organizing for the future (pp. 194-226). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
10. Daft, R. L., & Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organisational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 207-224.
11. Drucker, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organisation. Harvard Business Review, 66, 45-53.
12. Drucker, P. F. (1995). The information executives truly need. Harvard Business Review, 73, 54-62.
13. Feltham, G., & Xie, J. (1994). Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. The Accounting Review, 69, 429-453.
14. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organisations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Galbraith, J. R. (1993). The business unit of the future. In J. R. Galbraith, & E. E. Lawler, Organizing for the future (pp. 43-64). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
16. Galbraith, J. R., & Kazanjian, R. (1986). Strategy implementation: the role of structure and process. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
17. Galbraith, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (Eds.). (1993). Organizing for the future. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
18. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
19. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch, Handbook of organisational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research, (2nd ed.) Collier, MA: Massachusetts Free Press.
21. Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.
22. Ijiri, Y. (1975). Theory of accounting measurement (American Accounting Association studies in accounting research no. 10). Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
23. Ismail, Z., & Trotman, K. T. (1995). The impact of the review process in hypothesis generation tasks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 345-357.
24. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71-79.
25. Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): a review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
27. Lawler, E. E. (1981). Pay and organisational development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Lawler, E. E. (1986). High-involvement management: participative strategies for improving organisational performance. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
29. Lawler, E. E. (1993). Creating the high-involvement organisation. In J. R. Galbraith, & E.E. Lawler (Eds.), Organizing for the future (pp. 172-193). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
30. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organisation and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
31. Ledford, G. E. (1993). Employee involvement: lessons and predictions. In J. R. Galbraith, & E. E. Lawler, Organizing for the future (pp. 43-64). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
32. Maier, N. R. F. (1970). Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
33. Mohrman, Jr., A M., Mohrman, S. A., & Lawler, E. E. (1992). The performance management of teams. In W. J. Bruns, Jr., Performance measurement evaluation, and incentives (pp. 217-241). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
34. Mohrman, S. A. (1993). Integrating roles and structure in the lateral organisation. In J. R.Galbraith, & E. E. Lawler, Organizing for the future (pp. 109-141). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
35. Mohrman, S. A., & Mohrman Jr., A. M. (1993). Organisational change and learning. In J.R. Galbraith, & E. E. Lawler, Organizing for the future (pp. 87-108). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
36. Nanni, A. J., Dixon, J. R., & Vollmann, T. E. (1990). Strategic control and performance measurement. Journal of Cost Management, 4, 33-42.
37. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority vs minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
38. Pavlik, E. L., Scott, T. W., & Tiessen, P. (1993). Executive compensation: issues and research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 12, 131-189.
39. Perrow, C. (1972). Complex organisations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.
40. Pritchard, R. D., Jones, S. D., Roth, P. L., Stuebing, K. K., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1988). Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organisational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 337-358.
41. Rosen, S. (1982). Authority, control and the distribution of earnings. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 311-323.
42. Rosen, S. (1986). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. American Economic Review, 76, 701-715.
43. Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group dynamics: the psychology small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Stein, M. K. (1975). Stimulating creativity. New York: Academic Press.
45. Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking?. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 23-47.
46. Thompson, J. (1967). Organisations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Tiessen, P., & Waterhouse, J. H. (1983). Towards a descriptive theory of management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8, 251-267.
48. Von Glinow, M. A., & Mohrman, S. A., (Eds.). (1990). Managing complexity in high technology organisations. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Wanous, J. P., & Youtz, M. A. (1986). Solution diversity and the quality of group decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 149-159.
50. Yetton, P. W., & Bottger, P. C. (1982). Individual versus group problem solving: an empirical test of a best member strategy. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 307-321.
51. Young, S. M., Fisher, J., & Lindquest, T. M. (1993). The effects of intergroup competition and intragroup cooperation on slack and output in a manufacturing setting. The Accounting Review, 68, 466-481.