Development of variable microsatellite loci and range-wide characterization of nuclear genetic diversity in the important dryland shrub antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata)

Journal of Arid Environments

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-13

  Horning, M E ^a   Cronn, R C ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

FST; Germplasm management; Native plant; Restoration; SSR

Indexed keywords

ARID ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GERMPLASM; HETEROZYGOSITY; NATIVE SPECIES; NICHE; REVEGETATION; SHRUB;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

MAMMALIA; PURSHIA; PURSHIA TRIDENTATA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 56949090516     PISSN: 01401963     EISSN: 1095922X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bachelet D., Neilson R.P., Hickler T., Drapek R.J., Lenihan J.M., Sykes M.T., Smith B., Sitch S., and Thonicke K. Simulating past and future dynamics of natural ecosystems in the United States. Global Biogeographical Cycles 17 (2003) 14-11-14-21
2. Balloux F., and Lugon-Moulin N. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11 (2002) 155-165
3. Blaisdell J.P., and Mueggler W.F. Sprouting of bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) following burning or top removal. Ecology 37 (1956) 365-370
4. Bond G. Observations on the root nodules of Purshia tridentata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 192 (1976) 127-135
5. Brownstein M.J., Carpten J.D., and Smith J.R. Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. BioTechniques 20 (1996) 1004-1010
6. Clark R.J., Britton C.M., and Sneva F.A. Mortality of bitterbrush after burning and clipping in eastern Oregon. Journal of Range Management 35 (1982) 711-714
7. Cruzan M.B. Genetic markers in plant evolutionary ecology. Ecology 79 (1998) 400-412
8. Dalton D.A., and Zobel D.B. Ecological aspects of nitrogen fixation by Purshia tridentata. Plant Soils 48 (1977) 57-80
9. Furniss M.M. Entomology of Antelope Bitterbrush. In: Tiedemann A.R., Johnson K.L., and Kendall L. (Eds). Proceedings - Research and Management of Bitterbrush and Cliffrose in Western North America General Technical Report INT-152 (1983), USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT 164-172
10. Guenther G.E., Wambolt C.L., and Frisina M.R. Characteristics of bitterbrush habitats that influence canopy cover and mule deer browsing. Journal of Environmental Management 36 (1993) 175-181
11. Hall T. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41 (1999) 95-98
12. Hamilton M.B., Pincus E.L., Difiore A., and Fleischer R.C. Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. BioTechniques 27 (1999) 500-507
13. Hartl D.L. Principles of Population Genetics (1980), Sinauer Associates, INC., Sunderland, MA
14. Hedrick P.W. Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53 (1999) 313-318
15. Hufford K.M., and Mazer S.J. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 (2003) 147-155
16. Jarne P., and Lagoda P.J.L. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11 (1996) 424-429
17. Johnson G.R., and Berrang P.C. Seed shatter dates of antelope bitterbrush in Oregon. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60 (2007) 99-103
18. Joyce L., Baer J., McNulty S., Dale V., Hansen A., Irland L., Neilson R., and Skog K. Potential consequences of climate variability and change for the forests of the United States. Climate Change Impacts in the United States, Report for the US Global Change Research Program (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 489-521
19. Kalinowski S.T. How many alleles per locus should be used to estimate genetic distances?. Heredity 88 (2002) 62-65
20. Kufeld R.C. Foods eaten by the Rocky Mountain elk. Journal of Range Management 26 (1973) 106-113
21. Kufeld R.C., Wallmo O.C., and Feddema C. Foods of the Rocky Mountain Mule Deer. Research Paper RM-111 (1973), USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO, USA
22. Latta R.G. Differentiation of allelic frequencies at quantitative trait loci affecting locally adaptive traits. American Naturalist 151 (1998) 283-292
23. Lenihan J.M., Bachelet D., Neilson R.P., and Drapek R. Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California. Climate Change (2007) 10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0
24. Lesica P., and Allendorf F.W. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match?. Restoration Ecology 7 (1999) 42-50
25. McArthur E.D., Stutz H.C., and Sanderson S.C. Taxonomy, distribution, and cytogenetics of Purshia, Cowania, and Fallugia (Rosoideae, Rosaceae). In: Tiedemann A.R., Johnson K.L., and Kendall L. (Eds). Proceedings- Research and Management of Bitterbrush and Cliffrose in Western North America General Technical Report INT-152 (1983), USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT 4-24
26. McKay J.K., and Latta R.G. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 (2002) 285-291
27. Nord E.C. Autecology of bitterbrush in California. Ecological Monographs 35 (1965) 307-334
28. van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W.F., Wills P.M., and Shipley P. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4 (2004) 535-538
29. Peakall R., and Smouse P.E. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6 (2006) 288-295
30. Raymond M., and Rousset F. GENEPOP (version1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86 (1995) 248-249
31. Ries L., Debinski D.M., and Wieland M.L. Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conservation Biology 15 (2001) 401-411
32. Rozen S., and Skaletsky H.J. Primer 3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S., and Misener S. (Eds). Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology (2000), Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 365-386
33. Sherman R.J., and Chilcote W.W. Spatial and chronological patterns of Purshia tridentata as influenced by Pinus ponderosa. Ecology 53 (1972) 294-298
34. Spitze K. Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135 (1993) 367-374
35. Stuth J.W., and Winward A.H. Livestock-deer relations in the lodgepole pine-pumice region of central Oregon. Journal of Range Management 30 (1977) 110-116
36. Stutz H.C., and Thomas L.K. Hybridization and introgression in Cowania and Purshia. Evolution 18 (1964) 183-195
37. Travis S.E., Baggs J.E., and Maschinski J. Disentangling the role of hybridization in the evolution of the endangered Arizona cliffrose (Purshia subintegra: Rosaceae): a molecular and morphological analysis. Conservation Genetics (2007) 10.1007/s10592-007-9434-8
38. Vander Wall S.B. Seed fate pathways of antelope bitterbrush: dispersal by seed-caching yellow pine chipmunks. Ecology 75 (1994) 1911-1926
39. West N.E. Rodent-influenced establishment of ponderosa pine and bitterbrush seedlings in central Oregon. Ecology 49 (1968) 1009-1011
40. Young J., and Clements C. Purshia: The Wild and Bitter Rose (2002), University of Nevada Press, Reno
41. Young J.A., and Evans R.L. Stratification of bitterbrush seeds. Journal of Range Management 29 (1976) 421-425