Sustainable governance of natural resources and institutional change - An analytical framework

Public Administration and Development

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 123-137

  Fischer, Anke ^a   Petersen, Lorenz ^b   Feldkötter, Christoph ^b   Huppert, Walter ^b  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b Financial Systems Development Section   (Germany)

Author keywords

Development co operation; Governance; Incentives; Institutions; Natural resources

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INCENTIVE; INSTITUTIONAL REFORM; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE USE;

EID: 34248577941     PISSN: 02712075     EISSN: 1099162X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pad.442     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adger WN, Brown K, Fairbrass J, Jordan A, Rosendo S, Seyfang G. 2003. Governance for sustainability: towards a 'thick' analysis of environmental decision making. Environment and Planning A 35: 1095-1110.
2. Aligica PD. 2005. Institutional analysis and economic development policy; notes on the applied agenda of the Bloomington School. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 57: 159-165.
3. Bemelmans-Videc M-L, Rist R, Vedung E. 1998. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons - Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. Transaction Publishers: New Brunswick.
4. Bernauer T. 1995. The effect of international environmental institutions. How we might learn more. International Organization 49: 351-377.
5. BMZ (Bundesministerium fuer Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung). GTZ (Gesellschaft fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit). 2004. Guidelines on the preparation of TC programmes and projects. Bonn.
6. Brett E. 2003. Participation and accountability in development management. Journal of Development Studies 40(2): 1-29.
7. Brinkerhoff D. 2005. Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development 25(l): 3-14.
8. Campbell B, Sayer J (eds). 2003. Integrated Natural Resource Management. CAB International: Wallingford.
9. Carney D, Farrington J. 1998. Natural Resource Management and Institutional Change. Routledge: London.
10. Cleaver F. 2000. Moral ecological rationality, institutions and the management of communal resources. Development and Change 31(2): 361-383.
11. Cleaver F. 2002. Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. European Journal of Development Research 14(2): 11-30.
12. Connor R, Dovers S. 2004. Institutional Change for Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
13. De Groot R, Wilson M, Boumans R. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393-408.
14. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern P. 2003. The struggle to govern the Commons. Science 302: 1907-1912.
15. Edwards V, Steins N. 1998. Developing an analytical framework for multiple-use commons. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10: 347-383.
16. Fischer A, Petersen L, Huppert W. 2004. Natural Resources and Governance: Incentives for Sustainable Resource Use. GTZ: Eschborn http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/en-governance-nat-resources.pdf 11/05/2006
17. Gatzweiler F, Hagedorn K. 2002. The evolution of institutions in transition. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 2: 37-58.
18. Gottret MV, White D. 2003. Assessing the impact of integrated natural resource management: challenges and experiences. In Integrated Natural Resource Management, Campbell B, Sayer J (eds). CAB International: Wallingford.
19. GTZ GeselIschaft fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit. 2004. Results-based monitoring - guidelines for technical cooperation projects and programmes. Eschborn.
20. Hagedorn K (ed.). 2002. Environmental Cooperation and Institutional Change. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
21. Hagedorn K, Arzt K, Peters U. 2002. Institutional arrangements for environmental co-operatives: a conceptual framework. In Environmental Cooperation and Institutional Change, Hagedorn K (ed.). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham; 3-25.
22. Hamacher W, Heidbrink K, Paulus S. 2001. Umwelt-Politik-Beratung. Universum: Wiesbaden.
23. Hanisch M. 2003. Property Reform and Social Conflict. Shaker: Aachen.
24. Heltberg R. 2002. Property rights and natural resources management in developing countries. Journal of Economic Surveys 16: 190-214.
25. Herder-Dorneich P. 1986. Theorie der sozialen Steuerung. Nomos: Baden-Baden.
26. Hirschman A. 1967/1995. Development Projects Observed. Brookings Institution: Washington, DC.
27. Huppert W, Urban K. 1998. Analysing Service Provision. Universum: Wiesbaden.
28. Huppert W, Svendsen M, Vermillion D. 2001. Governing Maintenance Provision in Irrigation - A Guide to Institutionally Viable Maintenance Strategies. Universum: Wiesbaden.
29. Kim JA. 2004. Regime interplay: the case of biodiversity and climate change. Global Environmental Change 14: 315-324.
30. Kiser L, Ostrom E. 1982. The three worlds of action: a meta-theoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In Strategies of Political Inquiry, Ostrom E (ed.). Sage Publications: Beverly Hills; 179-222.
31. Messner D, Nuscheler F. 2003. Reformfelder zur Weiterentwicklung des internationalen Systems-Global Governance als Königsweg? Nord-Süd aktuell 17: 423-439.
32. Mosse D. 2004. Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change 35(4): 639-671.
33. Mosse D. 2005. Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. Pluto Press: London.
34. Nickson A. 2005. Bolivia: making government leadership in donor coordination work. Public Administration and Development 25(5): 399-407.
35. Nijnik M, Oskam A. 2004. Governance in Ukrainian forestry: trends, impacts and remedies. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance & Ecology 3: 116-133.
36. North DC. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
37. Oakerson R. 1992. Analysing the commons - a framework. In Making the Commons Work - Theory, Practice, and Policy, Bromley D (ed.). Institute for Contemporary Studies Press: San Francisco.
38. OECD. 1999. Handbook of Incentive Measures for Biodiversity - Design and Implementation. OECD publications: Paris.
39. O'Riordan T, Jordan A. 1999. Institutions, climate change and cultural theory; towards a common analytical framework. Global Environmental Change 9: 81-93.
40. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press: New York.
41. Ostrom E. 1999. Institutional rational choice - an assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. In Theories of the Policy Process, Sabatier PA (ed.). Westview Press: Boulder; 35-71.
42. Ostrom E, Schroeder H, Wynne S. 1993. Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development - Infrastructure Policies in Perspective. Westview Press: Boulder.
43. Ostrom E, Burger J, Field C, Norgaard R, Policansky D. 1999. Revisiting the Commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284: 278-282.
44. Ostrom E, Gibson C, Shivakumar S, Andersson K. 2002. Aid, Incentives, and Sustainability. Elanders Novum: Gothenburg.
45. Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern P, Stonich S, Weber E (eds). 2003. The Drama of the Commons. National Academy Press: Washington DC.
46. Paavola J. 2005. Environmental Conflicts and Institutions as the Conceptual Cornerstones of Environmental Governance Research. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), Working Paper EDM 05-01 http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/edm/ edm_2005_01.pdf 14/05/2006
47. Paavola J, Adger WN. 2005. Institutional ecological economics. Ecological Economics 53: 353-368.
48. Pankhurst A. 2003. Conflict management over contested natural resources: a case study of pasture, forest and irrigation in South Wello, Ethiopia. In Natural Resourre Conflict Management Studies: An Analysis of Power, Participation and Prvtected Areas, Castro AP, Nielsen E (eds). FAO/World Agricultural Information Centre.
49. Poteete A, Ostrom E. 2004. In pursuit of comparable concepts and data about collective action. Agricultural Systems 82: 215-232.
50. Raakjaer Nielsen J, Sen S, Sverdrup-Jensen S, Pomeroy RS. 1996. Analysis of fisheries co-management arrangements: a research framework. Co-management working article No. 21. Institute for Fisheries Management and Coastal Community Development (IFM) and International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM) http://www.ifm.dk/reports/ 21.PDF11//05/2006
51. Rasmussen LN, Meinzen-Dick R. 1995. Local Organizations for Natural Resource Management: Lessons from Theoretical and Empirical Literature. Environment and Production Technology Division, Discussion Paper No. 11. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC.
52. Ribot J. 2002. Democratic decentralization of natural resources: institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute: Washington.
53. Rohe K. 1977. Politik. Begriffe und Wirklichkeiten. Kohlhammer: Stuttgart.
54. Rudd M. 2004. An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments. Ecological Economics 48: 109-124.
55. Ruttan V, Hayami Y. 1984. Toward a Theory of Induced Institutional Innovation. Discussion Paper no. 200. Discussion Paper Series, Center for Economic Research, University of Minnesota.
56. Schlüter A. 2001. Institutioneller Wandel und Transformation. Shaker: Aachen.
57. Suporahardju, Wodicka S. 2003. Conflicts over community-based "Repong" resource management in Pesisir Krui Region, Lampung Province, Indonesia. In Natural Resource Conflict Management Studies: An Analysis of Power Participation and Protected Areas, Castro AP, Nielsen E (eds). FAO/World Agricultural Information Centre.
58. Tetzlaff R. 2003. Good Governance und Neopatrimonialismus in Afrika südlich der Sahara-ein Widerspruch? Nord-Süd aktuell 17: 478-486.
59. Thierfelder B, Walk H. 2003. Die Governance-Diskussion im Spiegelbild unterschiedlicher Interessen. Nord-Süd aktuell 17: 440-445.
60. Thomson J. 1992. A Framework for Analyzing Institutional Incentives in Community Forestry. FAO: Rome.
61. Thomson J, Schoonmaker Freudenberger K. 1997. Crafting instituional arrangements for community forestry. FAO community forestry field manual. FAO: Rome www.fao.org/docrep/W7483E/W7483EOO.htm 11/05/2006
62. Toner A, Franks T. 2006. Putting livelihoods thinking into practice: implications for development management. Public Administration and Development 26(1): 81-92.
63. Veeman TS, Politylo J. 2003. The role of institutions and policy in enhancing sustainable development and conserving natural capital. Environment, Development and Sustainability 5: 317-332.
64. von Hayek FA. 1967. Bemerkungen über die Entwicklung von Systemen von Verhaltensregeln. In Gesammelte Werke von F. A. von Hayek, von Hayek FA (ed.) 1969. Freiburger Studien Band 5. J.V.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck): Tübingen; 161-199.
65. von Hayek FA. 1971. Die Verfassung der Freiheit. J.V.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck): Tübingen; 161-199.
66. Williamson O. 1991. Economic Institutions: Spontaneous and intentional Governance. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 7: 159-187.
67. Williamson 0. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
68. Wittmer H, Birner R. 2004. The role of the state in biodiversity governance: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence from Guatemala. UFZ Bericht7/2004: Leipzig-Halle.
69. Wolmer W, Chaumba J, Scoomes I. 2004. Wildlife management and land reform in southeastern Zimbabwe: a compatible pairing or a contradiction in terms? Geoforum 35: 87-98.
70. Young OR. 2002. Institutional Interplay: The Environmental Consequences of Cross-Scale Linkages. In The Drama of the Commons, Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern P, Stonich S, Weber E (eds). 2003. National Academy Press: Washington DC; 263-292.