The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  van Boxtel, Jeroen J A ^a   Alais, David ^b   Erkelens, Casper J ^a   van Ee, Raymond ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; RETINA IMAGE; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; PHOTOSTIMULATION;

HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 39049135313     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001429     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Blake R (2001) A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. Brain & Mind 2: 5-38.
2. Tong F (2001) Competing theories of binocular rivalry. A possible resolution. Brain & Mind 2: 55-83.
3. Alais D, Blake R, eds (2005) Binocular Rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Wolfe JM (1984) Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Res 24: 471-478.
5. Kanai R, Kamitani Y (2003) Time-locked perceptual fading induced by visual transients. J Cogn Neurosci 15: 664-672.
6. Breitmeyer BG, Kersey M (1981) Backward masking by pattern stimulus offset. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7: 972-977.
7. Breitmeyer B, Ogmen, H (2006) Visual Masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision. New York: Oxford University Press. pp 370.
8. Michaels CF, Turvey MT (1979) Central sources of visual masking: indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance. Psychol Res 41: 2-61.
9. Brascamp JW, Knapen THJ, Kanai R, van Ee R, van den Berg AV (2007) Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 7: 1-12.
10. O'Shea RP, Blake R (1986) Dichoptic Temporal Frequency Differences Do Not Lead to Binocular-Rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics 39: 59-63.
11. O'Shea RP, Crassini B (1964) Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli. Percept Psychophys 36: 266-276.
12. Blake R, Lee SH (2005) The role of temporal structure in human vision. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 4: 21-42.
13. Van de Grind WA, Gruesser OJ, Lunkenheimer HO (1973) Temporal transfer properties of the afferent visual system. Physiological, neurophysiological and theoretical investigations. In: Jung R, ed (1973) Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Berlin: Springer Verlag. pp 431-574.
14. Grill-Spector K, Malach R (2004) The human visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 649-677.
15. Wilson HR (2003) Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 14499-14503.
16. Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL (1996) What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380: 621-624.
17. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 13-21.
18. Wolfe JM (1983) Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception 12: 447-456.
19. Blake R (1989) A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol Rev 96: 145-167.
20. van Boxtel JJA, van Ee R, Erkelens CJ (2007) Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. Journal of Vision 7: 1-11.
21. van Boxtel JJ, Knapen T, van Ee R, Erkelens CJ (2006) Exploring the parameter space of stimulus rivalry. Perception 35: Suppl. S: 32-32.
22. Fang F, He S (2005) Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nat Neurosci 8: 1380-1385.
23. Coltheart M (1980) The persistences of vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 290: 57-69.
24. Meyer GE, Maguire WM (1977) Spatial frequency and the mediation of short-term visual storage. Science 198: 524-525.
25. Tolhurst DJ (1973) Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of moving visual stimulus. J Physiol 231: 385-402.
26. Mukamel R, Harel M, Hendler T, Malach R (2004) Enhanced temporal non-linearities in human object-related occipito-temporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 14: 575-585.
27. Large ME, Aldcroft A, Vilis T (2005) Perceptual continuity and the emergence of perceptual persistence in the ventral visual pathway. J Neurophysiol 93: 3453-3462.
28. Ferber S, Humphrey GK, Vilis T (2005) Segregation and persistence of form in the lateral occipital complex. Neuropsychologia 43: 41-51.
29. Carlson TA, He S (2004) Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron 43: 407-914.
30. He S, Carlson T, Chen X (2005) Parallel Pathways and Temporal Dynamics in Binocular Rivalry. In: Alais D, Blake R, eds. Binocular Rivalry: MIT Press. pp 81-100.
31. Alais D, Parker A (2006) Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron 52: 911-920.
32. Blake R, Yu K, Lokey, Norman H (1998) Binocular rivalry and motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscicuce 10: 46-60.
33. Andrews TJ, Blakemore C (1999) Form and motion have independent access to consciousness. Nat Neurosci 2: 405-406.
34. Andrews TJ, Blakemore C (2002) Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry. Vision Res 42: 301-309.
35. Carlson TA, He S (2000) Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry. Curr Biol 10: 1055-1058.
36. Iorenceau J, Alais D (2001) Form constraints in motion binding. Nat Neurosci 4: 745-751.
37. Tadin D, Lappin JS, Blake R, Grossman ED (2002) What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? Nat Neurosci 5: 1010-1015.
38. Ramachandran VS, Armel C, Foster C, Stoddard R (1998) Object recognition can drive motion perception. Nature 395: 852-853.
39. Polonsky A, Blake R, Braun J, Heeger DJ (2000) Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 3: 1153-1159.
40. Tong F, Engel SA (2001) Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411: 195-199.
41. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1996) Activity changes in early visual cortex reflects monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379: 549-553.
42. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception. Trends Cogn Sci 3: 254-264.
43. Freeman AW (2005) Multistage model for binocular rivalry. J Neurophysiol 94: 4412-4420.
44. Bair W (2005) Visual receptive field organization. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 459-464.
45. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecturc in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160: 106-154.
46. Gilbert CD (1977) Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol 268: 391-421.
47. Muller JR, Metha AB, Krauskopf J, Lennie P (1999) Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. Science 285: 1405-1408.
48. Gur M, Snodderly DM (1997) A dissociation between brain activity and perception: chromatically opponent cortical neurons signal chromatic flicker that is not perceived. Vision Res 37: 377-382.
49. Jiang Y, Zhou K, He S (2007) Human visual cortex responds to invisible chromaoc flicker. Nat Neurosci 10: 657-662.
50. Fox R, Check R (1972) Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. J Exp Psychol 93: 283-289.
51. Blake R, Westendorf DH, Overton R (1980) What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception 9: 223-231.
52. Wunderlich K, Schneider KA, Kastner S (2005) Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci 8: 1595-1602.
53. Haynes J-D, Deichmann R, Rees G (2005) Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438: 496-499.
54. Tong F, Meng M, Blake R (2006) Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 502-511.
55. Kourtzi Z, Huberle E (2005) Spatiotemporal characteristics of form analysis in the human visual cortex revealed by rapid event-related fMRI adaptation. Neuroimage 98: 440-452.
56. Moutoussis K, Keliris G, Kourtzi Z, Logothetis N (2005) A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain. Vision Res 45: 2231-2243.
57. Dumoulin SO, Wandell BA (2008) Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 39: 647-660.
58. Battelli L, Pascual-Leone A, Cavanagh P (2007) The 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 204-210.
59. Bosking WH, Crowley JC, Fitzpatrick D (2002) Spatial coding of position and orientation in primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 5: 874-882.
60. Irwin DE, Brockmole JR (2004) Suppressing where but not what: the effect of saccades on dorsal- and ventral-stream visul processing. Psychol Sci 15: 467-473.
61. Gheorghiu E, Erkelens CJ (2005) Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereogram. Vision Res 45: 1603-1614.
62. Dodwell PC, Engel GR (1963) A theory of binocular fusion. Nature 198: 39-40 passim.
63. Lehmkuhle S, Fox R (1980) Effect of depth separation on metacontrast masking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 6: 605-621.
64. Bahill AT, Adler D, Stark L (1975) Most naturally occurring human saccades have magnitudes of 15 degrees or less. Invest Ophthalmol 14: 468-469.
65. von Wartburg R, Wurtz P, Pflugshaupt T, Nyffeler T, Lüthi M, et al. (2007) Size matters: Saccades during scene perception. Perception 36: 355-365.
66. Geisler WS, Perry JS, Super BJ, Gallogly DP (2001) Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Res 41: 711-724.