General or vocational curriculum: Ld preference

International Journal of Special Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 40-48

  Dupoux, Errol ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56749156201     PISSN: 08273383     EISSN: 08273383     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aaron, P. G., Joshi, M., & Williams, A. K. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 120-138.
2. American Youth Policy Forum and Center On Education Policy (2001). Twenty-five years of educating children with disabilities: The good news and the work ahead. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Bernz, R. M , & Halpern, S. A.(1987). Transition services for secondary students with mild disabilities: A statewide perspective. Exceptional Children, 53(6), 507-514.
4. Bishop, J, & Mane, F. (2005). Raising academic standards and vocational concentrators: Are they better off or worse off? Education Economics, 13(2), 171-187.
5. Bolt, S & Thurlow, M. (2004). Five of the most frequently allowed testing accommodations in state policy: Synthesis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 25(3), 141-152.
6. Bouck, C. E. (2004). Exploring secondary special education for mild mental impermanent: A program in search of its place. Remedial and Special Education, 25(6), 367-382.
7. Bryan, T., & Warger, C. (1998). Teaching science as social science: A curriculum focus for adolescents with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30(7), 1-14.
8. Castellano, M., Stringtiled, S., & Stone, R. J. (2003). Second career and technical education and comprehensive school reform: Implications for research and practice. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 231-272.
9. Conderman, G. J., & Katsiyannis, A. (2002). Instructional issues and practices in secondary special education. Remedial and Special Education, 23(3), 169-180.
10. Cowell, A. (2002). Bilingual curriculum among the northern Arapaho. American Indian Quarterly, 26(1), 24-44.
11. Foreman-Peck, L., & Thompson, L. (1998). Destined to fail? A study of possible factors leading to the non-completion of a general national vocational qualification course; competition, guidance and student perceptions. Westminster Studies in Education, 21, 21-34.
12. Fulk, B. M. (1996). Reflections on "The effects of combined strategy and attribution training on LD adolescents' spelling performance." Exceptionality, 6(1), 59-64.
13. Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J. W.,& Metz, D. L. (1988). Extended practice of addition facts: Strategy changes in learning disabled students. Cognition and Instruction, 5(3), 223-266.
14. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28(6), 545-579.
15. Halpern, S. A., & Bernz, R. M. (1987). A statewide examination of secondary special education with mild disabilities: Implications for the high school curriculum. Exceptional Children, 54(2), 122-129.
16. IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No.105-17 (1997).
17. IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
18. Jerald, C. (2000). The state of the states: Work on standards and accountability continued in 1999, but much remains to be done. Education Week, 19(18), 62-66.
19. Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2003). Educating Exceptional Children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in every day life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lewis, C. A. (2004). Career/Tech and NCLB. Tech Directions, 63(10), 6.
22. Lewis, V. M. (2000). Vocational education and the dilemma of education. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 25(4), 575-584.
23. Lindstrom, E. L., & Benz, R. M. (2002). Phases of career development: Case studies of young women with learning disabilities. Council of Exceptional Children, 69(1), 67-83.
24. Maheady, L., Sacca, M. K., & Harper, G. F. (1988). Classwide peer tutoring with mildly handicapped high school students. Exceptional Children, 55, 52-59.
25. McDonnell, L., McLaughlin, M., & Morison, P. (Eds.) (1997). Education one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Mitra, D. L. (2003). Student voice in school reform: Reframing student-teacher relationships. McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 289-304.
27. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation NCTM standards for school mathematics. Reston, V A: Author.
29. NCLB, No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107-110 (2001).
30. Olson, J. L., & Platt, J. C. (2004). Teaching children and adolescents with special needs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
31. Prentice, M. C. (2001). ERIC: Integrating academic and occupational instruction. Community College Review, 29(2), 80-94.
32. Prestine, N. (1998). Separate tables: Academic and vocational education reforms in traditional, comprehensive high school (MD-1076). Berkeley: University of California, National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
33. Public Law 94-142 (Education of the Handicapped Act of 1975). Federal Register, 42, 163 (August 23, 1977).
34. Pugach, M. C., & Warger, C. L. (2001). Curriculum matters: Raising expectations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 194-196.
35. Raymond, E. B. (2000). Learners with mild disabilities. Boston: Allyn & bacon.
36. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Research, 16(9), 13-20.
37. Rojewski, W. J., & Kim, H. (2003). Career choice patterns and behavior of work-bound youth during early adolescence. Journal of Career Development, 30(20), 89-108.
38. Sandholtz, J., Ogawa, R., & Scribner, S. (2004). Standards gaps: Unintended consequences of local standards-based reform. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1177-1202.
39. Taylor, A. (2006). 'Bright lights' and 'twinkies': Career pathways in an education market. Journal of Educational Policy, 21(1), 35-37.
40. Troia, G. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1999). Teaching students with learning disabilities to mindfully plan when writing. Exceptional Children, 65(2), 235-252.
41. Turnbull, H. R., Turnbull, P. A., Wehmeyer, L. M., & Park, J, (2003). A quality of life framework for special education outcomes. Remedial & Special Education, 24(2), 67-75.
42. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Twentieth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, DC: Author.
43. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, DC: Author.
44. Warger, C. L, & Pugach, M. C. (1996). Curriculum considerations in an inclusive environment. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(8), 1-12.
45. Weller, C., Strawser, S., & Buchanan, M. (1985). Adaptive behavior: Designator of a continuum of severity of learning disabled individuals. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18(4), 200-204.
46. Woodward, J., & Montague, M. (2002). Meeting the challenge of Mathematics reform for students with LD. Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 89-102.
47. Young, M. (1998). The curriculum of the future 'new sociology of education' to a critical theory of learning. London: Flamer.
48. Ysseldyke, J. E., Olsen, K., & Thurlow, M. (1997). Issues and considerations in alternate assessments (Synthesis Report 27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED415656)
49. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Olsen, K. (1999). Putting alternate assessments into practice: What to measure and possible sources of data. Exceptional Children, 65(2), 175-186.
50. nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.