Subjective scoring for the harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form a

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1990, Pages 112-124

  Kirsch, Irving ^a   Council, James R ^b   Wickless, Cynthia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SUGGESTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; MALE; PERSONALITY TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; SUGGESTION;

EID: 0025375873     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: 17445183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207149008414506     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barber,T. X. Hypnosis: A scientific approach. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1969.
2. Bowers, K. S. Hypnotic behavior The differentiation of trance and demand characteristic variables. J. abnorm. Psychol., 1966, 71, 42–51.
3. Bowers, K. S. The effect of demands for honesty on reports of visual and auditory hallucinations. Int. J. din. exp. Hypnosis, 1967, 15, 31–36.
4. Bowers, K. S. do the Stanford scales tap the “classic suggestion effect”? Int. J. din. exp. Hypnosis, 1981, 29, 42–53.
5. Bowers, P. The classic suggestion effect: Relationships with scales of hypnotizability, effortless experiencing, and imagery vividness. Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis, 1982, 30, 270–279.
6. Bowers, P., laurence,J.-R., & Hart, D. The experience of hypnotic suggestions. Int. J. din. exp. Hypnosis, 1988, 36, 336–349.
7. Council, J. R., & Huff, K. D. Hypnosis, fantasy activity, and reports of paranormal experience in high, medium, and low fantasizers. Brit. J. exp. din. Hypnosis, in press.
8. Council, J. R., kirsch, 1., Vickery, A. R., & Carlson, D. “Trance” vs. “skill” hypnotic inductions: The effects of credibility, expectancy, and experimenter modeling. J. consult. din. Psychol., 1983, 51, 432–440.
9. Emmelkamp, R. M. g.Phobic and obsessive-compulsive disorders: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Plenum, 1982.
10. Gwynn, M. I., Spanos, N. P., Gabora, N. J., & Jarrett, L. E. Long term and short term follow-up on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Form A. Brit. J. exp. din. Hypnosis, 1988, 5, 117–124.
11. Hilgard, E. R., Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt Brace & World, 1965.
12. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Evans, F. J. Recovery of memory after posthypnotic amnesia. J. abnorm. Psychol., 1976, 85, 654–659.
13. Kihlstrom, J. F., & register, P. A. Optimal scoring of amnesia on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Int. J. din. exp. Hypnosis, 1984, 32, 51–57.
14. Kirsch, I., Silva, C. E., Carone, J. E., Johnston, J. D., & Simon, B. The surreptitious Observation design: An experimental paradigm for distinguishing artifact from essence in hypnosis. J. abnorm. Psychol., 1989, 98, 132–136.
15. Nace, E. P., Orne, M. T., & Hammer, A. G. Posthypnotic Amnesia as an active psychic process. Arch. gen. Psychiat., 1974, 31, 257–260.
16. Orne, M. T. The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence. J. abnorm. Psychol., 1959, 58, 277–299.
17. Orne, M. T. On The mechanisms of posthypnotic amnesia. Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis, 1966, 14, 121–134.
18. Orne, M. T. The simulation of hypnosis: Why, how, and what it means. Int. J. clin. exp. Hypnosis, 1971, 19, 183-210.
19. Orne, M. T. On the simulating subject as a quasi-control group in hypnosis research: What, why, and how. In E. Fromm & R. E. Shor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives. (Rev. 2nd ed.) New York: Aldine, 1979. Pp. 519–601.
20. Sheehan, P. W., & Perry, C. W. Methodologies of hypnosis: A critical appraisal of contemporary paradigms of hypnosis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
21. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1962.
22. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. Norms on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Int. J. din. exp. Hypnosis, 1963, 11, 39-47.
23. Shor, R. E., Orne, M. T., & O’Connell, D. N. Psychological correlates of plateau hypnotizability in a special volunteer sample. J. Pers. soc. Psychol., 1966, 3, 80–95.
24. Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. l, Hodcins, D. C., Stam, H. J., & Bertrand, L. D. The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychol. Rep., 1983, 53, 523–535.
25. Wagstaff, G. F., Hypnosis, compliance and belief. New York: St. Martin’s, 1981.
26. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R., Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1962.
27. Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. The Creative Imagination Scale as a measure of hypnotic responsiveness: Applications to experimental and clinical hypnosis. Amer. J. din. Hypnosis, 1978, 20, 235–249.